Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No Andy, I'll scan, redact and upload later today. So the court sent me 2 letters, same envelope and stapled together but with different dates!. 1. N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, stating: UPON considering the papers herein IT IS ORDERED THAT The claim is listed for an attended hearing 25 May....... at which court will consider allocation..  etc   2. N24 Notice of PTR/Adjnd/Restored/Hrg/Management conference TAKE NOTICE that the hearing will take place on 24 May at....... When you should attend 30 minutes has been allowed for the Hearing   No other instructions anywhere in the envelope or on the letters. Do I attend both?
    • Then leave it just proceed with the claim( strike out/SJ application are risky).....the defendant will not be permitted to rely on written evidence (documented) only verbally as they failed to comply with the N157 (unless they have filed with the court and failed to serve you a copy) ?  
    • Ive asked court to strike out for non compliance but they came back and said needs £275 application fee and formal n244  
    • Did the N24 invite either party to submit a statement ?
    • Thanks for responding Andy, that was my understanding when receiving the N24, mild panic when I got Link's WS for the date though! not sure why they would send me theirs..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Santander rejected debenhams card ppi claim - How people have been successful reclaiming PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening,

 

I have just had a complaint with Santander rejected for a Debenhams store card.

 

I would appreciate any advice as to how people have been successful.

I was offered the card in store, with the offer of a discount for the following month for purchases in store, and also told if prices fell further during that time that I would be credited for these price falls.

 

It was a rushed process. The PPI wasn’t explained to me at all.  No terms, conditions etc were mentioned.

 

I have recently been told that the person offering me the store card in store would have been paid commission. This was not explained to me or how the PPI accrued interest.

 

Any help or advice would be appreciated.

 

 Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get all the statements via an sar

you'll probably find this was a GE Money one 

if to you'll have to go after the PPI insurance under writers which I think are genworth or aviva.

 

hit the cag logo top left 

using the google custom search on the right 

type in Debenhams PPI 

or aalike

you'll soon get the idea of what to do.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why did they reject it?

did you just send a speculative letter ?

not use the FOS questionnaire and a spreadsheet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Santander rejected debenhams card ppi claim - How people have been successful reclaiming PPI

The reasons for the decision given by Santander were:
1) I was in permanent paid employment and would have been eligible to make a claim.
2) It was a non-advised sale and they wouldn’t have sought information about alternative insurance.
3) Unable to conclude the policy was inappropriate for me.
4) They are satisfied the sale of the PPI was not substantially flawed and there remain grounds to conclude I would have bought the policy in any event.

I filled in the Santander questionnaire detailing my employee benefits and alternative insurance I had.

 

I didn’t use a spreadsheet as I didn’t have all the statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the buttonholer got +£300 each time they signed someone up to PPI 

what was your employment sick pay

if it was like this

id be inclined to fill the FOS questionnaire out from the FCA PPI site ink

and take this to the FOS.

 

 

PPI local council employee PPI reclaimwon.pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice.

 

I’ve drafted a response from advice received and reading the Ombudsman’s website. 

 

Please can you tell me what you think?

 

I don’t think I was given enough information about the policy when I bought it.

 

When completing the application in store there was no mention of how much the policy cost.

No example of what this would mean in reality to me were provided.

 

It was not explained that if I claimed on the policy the premium would still need to be paid and that I would have had to pay interest on it, thereby reducing the value of the cover provided. 

 

It was also not explained that even if I had cleared the balance in full each month that I’d still have had to pay the premium.

 

There was also no explanation at all of what benefits I could have expected to get from the policy. 

 

I feel that the costs and benefits were not properly explained to me at the point when I bought the policy. 

 

I think that if I had been provided with this information that I would’ve decided the policy didn’t offer me value for money. The policy was very expensive and I had good sickness benefits from my employer and would have received statutory redundancy.  I was I n a very stable profession.  In 25 years in the teaching profession I have never seen a teacher I worked with be made redundant.

 

Additionally, I had my own income protection cover in place that would have started as soon as my employer benefits had ceased and I was covered up until retirement at the age of 60 if I was unable to work due to accident or illness.  I also had in-service death benefits of 3x my salary as well as my income protection that would have paid out over £100,000 if I died.

 

I don’t think I would’ve thought the policy offered me good value for money if I’d understood the benefits I’d have received.

 

I think if I had been given better information about what the policy cost and what the benefits were that I would’ve decided not to buy the policy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH id keep it simple stupid ...KISS...

 

simple use only the vact that it was of no use to you as you had very good LEA sick cover.

 

you cant go into details of what else makes it bad as the PPI was a non advised sale

 

no harm in mentioning that you were button-holed by a sales assistant about how good the card discounts were by nothing was said about PPI nor that it was being levied.

 

haven't par chance got the application form have you?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t have the application form but will do a SAR now. I’ll wait until I’ve got this information back before challenging their decision.

 

in the decision letter the following reference to the application form l was made:

 

We have on file a copy of a store card agreement you were asked to sign when opening the account. This has an optional, separate place to indicate the inclusion of PPI.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like what i'm moving toward..

 

the button-holer put an ink X here here and here

you signed it

so leading you on to signup for unwanted PPI to gain their £300 commission ..

 

quite common and p'haps the only other reason to add into the FOS CQ about mis-sale.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for all your advice.

 

I’ll post any updates so anyone else dealing with Santander has more information to base their complaints on.

 

I’ve had success with M&S (a Loan and a credit card), Halifax (Loans and Mortgage PPI) and NRAM (Loans)and they have all been far easier and faster to deal with than Santander.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...