Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fake TFL 16 + oyster card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I signed up for a fake oyster card and have recently been caught with it and i am currently being investigated. (just sent email replying to letter).

 

I used my friends address to deliver the oyster,

he has a fake 16+ oyster that was sent to that his address.

 

He currently hasn't been caught with it, will my investigation look into the address and find the other oyster that are linked to the address, resulting him in the same situation? 

or do they require the card for that information. 

 

thank you 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hopefully so

you and he  have purposefully defrauded TFL.

 

no sympathy...sorry.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I have used it for a few months I have given my mitigating circumstances(financial issues, Affecting future prospects,a student, also dependencies. 

Also accepted offence 

is there any hope for OOC as this is my first letter received from tfl

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

When you say you have accepted the defence, do you mean you've pleaded guilty or that you haven't tried to say you didn't do this please?

 

There's always a chance of agreeing to settle OOC, but we can't second guess what TfL will do and there's no silver bullet for this one. All you can di is to keep trying to negotiate. We have other threads on the same issue that you can read to see how other people have dealt with this. Some of them have posted the outcome of their cases.

 

From what I've seen here, TfL are taking a hard line on fake cards and given the number of cases we see, which is likely to be only part of what's going on, TfL has a big problem with loss of revenue from this dishonest behaviour.

 

HB

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As in the letter they sent me i had two options deny the offence or accept, i accepted it.

I completely admitted the actions, did not hide anything i did, and apologised. I am hoping for a formal warning, if that is possible, or even a large fine settlement

Edited by hiddenhx
Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎28‎/‎03‎/‎2019 at 21:26, hiddenhx said:

I signed up for a fake oyster card and have recently been caught with it and i am currently being investigated. (just sent email replying to letter).

 

I used my friends address to deliver the oyster,

he has a fake 16+ oyster that was sent to that his address.

 

He currently hasn't been caught with it, will my investigation look into the address and find the other oyster that are linked to the address, resulting him in the same situation? 

or do they require the card for that information. 

 

thank you 

 

Hi, their investigation is in to your circumstances not your friend’s. Where it is possible the address would flag up if you’ve mentioned your friend, unless TfL have his card, there’s no real evidence to suggest any wrongdoing on anybody else’s  part.

 

This has obviously got to the stage whereby they’re considering a court summons, so I’m assuming you were thoroughly investigated and questioned under caution?

 

The compensation here may be taken in to account on a day by day, journey by journey basis, assuming you were questioned on individual journeys.

 

Otherwise I’d imagine they’d be seeking to get the cost of the full priced travel card out of you.

This will prove costly either way, as you’ve made it necessary for TfL to pile loads of time, money and resources in to this case no doubt,

 

so don’t be surprised IF they consider a settlement, for it to be a hefty amount

(don’t want to pluck a figure out of thin air, but to be, it sounds likely it’ll be a four figure sum?).

 

TfL historically take a hardline one Oyster misuse, so I wouldn’t like to guess your chances of appealing to their kinder side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i really dont mind paying a four figure amount, i recently just got a grad job and this will ruin it all, i just hope they will consider a settlement

 

i provided alot of mitigating circumstances, which are true, so they should consider ooc i hope

Edited by hiddenhx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey,

 

Just a quick question to maybe provide some further advise to you. 

 

Were you caught by an inspector in person or did your Oyster card stop working randomly then you were sent a letter?

 

On 29/03/2019 at 09:52, hiddenhx said:

i really dont mind paying a four figure amount, i recently just got a grad job and this will ruin it all, i just hope they will consider a settlement

 

i provided alot of mitigating circumstances, which are true, so they should consider ooc i hope

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh right. Abit of an annoying situation. How did you receive the letter then was it to your friends address? Also did you use your real name and real picture etc or did you use a different one? 

 

I am curious to know, how long have you had this oyster for? Before 2019 or after?

 

Also never use these ZIP cards again. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No was just curious as if you had the card delivered to your friends address but then you have the inspector your address it can look a little fishy. 

 

And I’m regards to when you got your oyster, just thinking that it was recent? Just to see the process they are taking as they are taking different processes for different people 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah it could look fishy, but i already accepted the offence so if they have further questions ill tell them, but i didn't disclose that it was delivered to that address.

 

i got my oyster last year, dont know if things changed now.

Edited by hiddenhx
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi i have recieved a court data and i have been charged with " Contrary to Bylaw 17(1) of the Transport for London Railway Byelaws Made under paragraph 26 of Schedule 11 to the Greater London Authority Act 1999 and confirmed under section 67 of the Transport Act 1962."

- 17(1) is " Did not enter a compulsory tick area without having with him a valid ticket"

 

does that mean i am not being charged under fraud^

 

Can i also confirm that there is a possibility that a record may not be entered if i provide sufficient mitigating circumstances before the judge?

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you never were.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also regarding the record, can my sufficient evidence for mitigating circumstances sway the judge not to enter a record and just ask me to pay just a fine?

 

Is that a possibility? ^ (if OOC doesn't work)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is very rare but has happened .

 

I would assume bar the time you were 'caught' the other XX? times are all TIC?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have used the card for months before being caught.

is there not a complete list?
 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Fake TFL 16 + oyster card

which are TIC and require you to sign each one.

 

although this is a success ..NOT a fake card usage onet [as no-one here has ever BOTHERED to tell us their FAKE card use outcome!!]

it will help you to read , understand and respond.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...