Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CWD Court Docs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1202 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 252
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just the AOS ......you have 33 days in total ...19 days from and including the date on the claim form (or from when deemed served) and a further 14 days to submit a defence....33 days..assuming your not contesting jurisdiction

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

 

I have a strong defence on this and I am not disclosing it here as I know the lawyers will want to try to quash it but I confident.

 

However I have been advised by a member here to file the N244 now - In fairness I don't have £255 to do so so I am a bit aggrieved to do so. Can I send just the AOS now re: jurisdiction? The N244 is a setting aside request - yet no judgment has been set yet as obviously I have only been served the notice.

 

Please advise? Particularly Hornsey62 and Squaddie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Spoke to the Courts this morning - OK:

 

So with regards to contesting Jurisdiction:

Jurisdiction isn't whether they are they and I am here. Its all down to am I here - i.e Am in England/Wales and governed by the laws here. 

 

With regards to the defence I have until the 26th to Submit the defence and courts say that contesting Jurisdiction often clouds defence as its the first thing to be investigated and the clerk pointed out they do have jurisdiction to claim against me as I live in England.

 

He also pointed out the N244 is not applicable at this stage as No Judgement has been made against me at this time and this is the initial filing. 

Defence can be returned either today or by 26th April. I will file this next week as I want more time to compile but will file the AOS today. 

 

Thanks for everyones help so far. I am going to need help with the defence lines - but I've been told I am not allowed to Direct message anyone about it so I guess I may as well just tell the claimant all my defence!!  

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so a court clerk is a judge now..urm...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andyorch said:

And I stand by all that advice as that is the correct procedure to contest the courts jurisdiction to hear and deal with the claim.You had to have a hearing because the claimants challenged your application.....that has never happened before on this forum... normally would not require a hearing....they simply drop the claim.

 

You do not submit evidence or a defence in an application to contest the courts jurisdiction as by doing so you are submitting to the courts jurisdiction and accepting that the court does have jurisdiction.That is why the court has now ordered you submit a defence because the question of Jurisdiction has been accepted by the court.It does not mean that you have submitted to the courts jurisdiction.

 

I did advise you to raise points such as had the claimant requested permission to serve out of jurisdiction. The English Court should not exercise its jurisdiction if there is a more appropriate forum (known as the doctrine of "forum non conveniens") and Another gateway is where the dispute relates to a contract which is governed by English law or contains a term conferring jurisdiction on the English Courts to determine any claim in respect of the contract.

 

Did the agreement refer to Exclusive or None exclusive jurisdiction clauses limit disputes to the courts of one jurisdiction.

 

It is noted that yours refers at 11.13

 

" These terms and conditions are governed by the laws of the Emirate of Dubai and the UAE.You and we submit to the none exclusive jurisdiction of the civil courts of the UAE.Such submission shall not restrict our rights to bring in any other jurisdiction.

 

Further reading.....

 

http://disputeresolutionblog.practicallaw.com/taking-steps-without-submitting-to-the-jurisdiction-how-far-can-you-go/

https://www.ashurst.com/en/news-and-insights/legal-updates/jurisdiction-clauses/

http://www.shlegal.com/insights/when-will-the-english-courts-have-jurisdiction-over-a-dispute

https://www.latham.london/2019/01/english-court-of-appeal-clarifies-test-for-determining-jurisdictional-challenges/

 

 

So according to this by challenging the Jurisdiction with the Non-Exclusive clause they have included - meaning they can challenge elsewhere but only if no other challenge has been made previously - Then it proves they haven't put this through the UAE judicial system meaning then by default they can't represent or claim for it here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He also pointed out the N244 is not applicable at this stage as No Judgement has been made against me at this time and this is the initial filing. 

 

So he too also does not understand the process and how to use CPR 11 and that an an application notice is only used to set a side judgment..not to request an Order or a Direction or its many other uses.

 

He does not  recommend you to contest jurisdiction as it " clouds defence " ?????????  and you agree thats it right and correct for a UAE credit claim be submitted against you and tried in an English Court.

 

You do not have to contest jurisdiction its your choice,,,but once you AOS and submit a defence it is deemed that you submit to jurisdiction and accept the claim.

 

Finally I did not state you are not allowed to Direct Message..I did advise you do not direct message for advice as advice given by PM is not open to question and clarification by other members..as its on a one to one basis with no validation its correct.

 

And no you dont need to  tell the claimant all my defence!!   Simply post it here to your thread which is right as everything should be on your own thread as a PDF attachment ..only members can then read its contents.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well along those lines yes and also more importantly the question of The English Court should not exercise its jurisdiction if there is a more appropriate forum (known as the doctrine of "forum non conveniens") 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

He also pointed out the N244 is not applicable at this stage as No Judgement has been made against me at this time and this is the initial filing. 

 

So he too also does not understand the process and how to use CPR 11 and that an an application notice is only used to set a side judgment..not to request an Order or a Direction or its many other uses.

 

He does not  recommend you to contest jurisdiction as it " clouds defence " ?????????  and you agree thats it right and correct for a UAE credit claim be submitted against you and tried in an English Court.

 

You do not have to contest jurisdiction its your choice,,,but once you AOS and submit a defence it is deemed that you submit to jurisdiction and accept the claim.

 

Finally I did not state you are not allowed to Direct Message..I did advise you do not direct message for advice as advice given by PM is not open to question and clarification by other members..as its on a one to one basis with no validation its correct.

 

And no you dont need to  tell the claimant all my defence!!   Simply post it here to your thread which is right as everything should be on your own thread as a PDF attachment ..only members can then read its contents.

 

Andy

 Ok but now on the basis of the AOS you again contradict yourself Andy,

 

If I tick the Jurisdiction Box and don't click to Defend are you saying I need to do the N244? The N244 is applicable only against judgement yet no judgement made? 

 

I really appreciate you are trying to help but the point of the CAG site is surely to help people on Layman's terms? 

 

Now I have one fully trashed AOS form with boxes ticked and crossed out and same all over again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

Well along those lines yes and also more importantly the question of The English Court should not exercise its jurisdiction if there is a more appropriate forum (known as the doctrine of "forum non conveniens") 

OK thank you for this - and the only way to support the Jurisdiction claim is to file the N244? Or will I get an initial hearing outlining this and I go and defend against the Jurisdiction? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read CPR 11 its explains what steps you take if you are contesting jurisdiction....you can tick defend all if you wish...but its not referred to in CPR 11.....only to complete the acknowledgment of service and tick I contest Jurisdiction....and submit an n244 within 14 days of acknowledgment.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part11

 

(9) If a defendant makes an application under this rule, he must file and serve his written evidence in support with the application notice, but he need not before the hearing of the application file –

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The process to contest jurisdiction is to AoS and submit an application n244 within 14 days of acknowledging..you can do it at the same time if you have it all ready and completed.

There will be an hearing if the claimant opposes the application to decide and allow you to present your reasons for challenging jurisdiction.

 

Try not to use words such as " defend  against the Jurisdiction " you cant defend it you can oppose it and ask the court to decide..but ultimately its the Judges decision and if the judge disagrees with your application the claim proceeds....IE you then submit your defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posts moved to your own thread

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm submitting the AOS now - ticked both boxes. 

Defend and Contest 

 

Will submit either N244 or Defence within the 14 days between 12th and 26th.

Interesting issues around the total amount - docs not signed - and now your Non-Exclusive reasoning plus a gem of info I won't put here about how the loan and cards were obtained that representatives of the claimant and even the claimant won't necessarily be aware of.

 

I'm hoping this is the case that will help burn them.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Must be an N244 Application Notice if your contesting jurisdiction as per the process explained...if your not then yes submit a defence as normal.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

Must be an N244 Application Notice if your contesting jurisdiction as per the process explained...if your not then yes submit a defence as normal.

Thanks Andy - but ok to tick both boxes now and will have the 14 days to send N244 and/or defence across? This gives me time to consult with the forum and get all completed correctly. Right now I am agains the clock to get this AOS back in time for Friday 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes  within 14 days either way

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Andyorch said:

Yes  within 14 days either way

Andy I don't know if you do it to wind people up on here - but thats a perfect example of how you aren't clear.

 

Yes or No. Simple.

 

Do I tick both boxes.

 

Defend all of claim 

and

Contest Jurisdiction.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes either way depending on whether you are contesting jurisdiction or if not and just submitting a defence ...its within 14 days.

 

Tick Contest Jurisdiction

 

You can tick Defend all (incase you decide not to contest jurisdiction)

 

You then have a further 14 days to either submit an N244 application or send a defence as normal

 

Strange how Hornsey and Squaddy got it within one post :becky:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

Yes either way depending on whether you are contesting jurisdiction or if not and just submitting a defence ...its within 14 days.

 

Strange how Hornsey and Squaddy got it within one post :becky:

Because neither of them asked about ticking both boxes. 

 

Perhaps if this was happening to you you would understand the pressures we are actually facing. 

Equally both squaddie and Hornsey62 that you 'advised', lost their Jurisdiction challenges.

 

Hence I am making sure all correct. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither Hornsey or Squaddy were in two minds and undecided...they were simply contesting jurisdiction with no intention of defending or submitting a defence.

They and we assumed the court would rule in their favour.

 

Your covering both bases by ticking both boxes in case you change your mind.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its okay to tick both boxes in your particular scenario...in case you change your mind and dont contest Jurisdiction.The courts will ignore contest jurisdiction until they actually receive your application....and if you dont submit an application and just submit a defence then it proceeds as a normal defended claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...