Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Intrum/Tesco debt


Americanmuscle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1764 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

not posted in a long time but back again.

 

Tesco who I have been making a monthly payment of £20 against a £2k debt have now sold the debt to Intrum,

ever since they have taken it over they have repeatedly left voicemails

(number is blocked but can still leave a voicemail), text me and written to me asking for me to contact them,

to date I have not made contact and have changed the payments so Intrum are receiving the £20,

 

today I have received yet another letter stating..

"We're thinking of taking you to court, we don't want to.But, if you don't get in touch soon, we'll pass your account to our legal team.

They'll consider applying for a County Court Judgement...yada yada yada"

 

Would I be correct in my thinking that as I am continuing to make the monthly repayments (they are lucky to be getting them as been off work for 2 years due to an accident) the reality of obtaining a CJ is slim to none?

 

So, a scare tactic to get me to contact them?

I've no problem writing to them which I'm thinking of doing with a settlement offer anyway.

Or they can apply to a court to obtain a CCJ to get me to pay something I am already paying?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these instalments as a result of an agreement which you reach with Tesco? Even if they're not, if they have gone on long enough and there have been no problems then I think you could argue that there is an implied agreement and in that case it might be considered unfair if there is an attempt to change the agreement or even to litigate for the alleged debt.

You need to tell us more about the debt. Fill this out <<<<<

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please fill this out <<<<

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what does the rest of the letter state why do they want you to contact them...to up your payments ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Appologies for the late update, work has been hectic.

 

I wrote to Intrum on 1st April pointing out that when they purchased the debt from Tesco I was already on a payment plan and that this would have carried over when they purchased the debt,

 

I also made a full and final offer to them of £500 (against an almost £2k debt) I sent this letter 'signed for' and still have the receipt, not heard from Intrum until a letter arrived today....

 

'We are planning to hand your account over to our legal team on 09/06/19. They may apply for a CCJ to demand you repay the money by a certain date.If you dont pay and judgement is granted, we can apply to the court to issue: attachement of earnings or a charging order...yada yada yada'

 

I think I will write to them directing them to my earlier letter and see what they say :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldn't bother with pointless letter tennis.

when did you open this account?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jan 2017

I entered into the monthly payment agreement with Tesco,

they then sold the debt on to Intrum in Jan of this year,

 

Intrum have been trying to get me to call them/register online with them to come to a payment arangement ever since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I decided to re-send the letter I sent them at the start of April,

they received the 2nd letter (always by signed for post) on June 7 but again they have chosen to ignore it,

 

today I received a letter from their legal department stating...

 

Our collections team has passed your account to us because you haven't agreed a way to pay the money you owe us.

We're now in charge of getting a County Court Judgement issued against you, to demand you pay the money back.

 

Get in touch within 10 days or we'll pass your account to our solicitors, they'll write explaining what you owe and giving you one last chance to pay. If you don't pay, they may apply for a CCJ.

 

The court could demand that you also pay the solicitors costs and court fees, which we'll add to the balance you owe us.

 

Nice that they choose to ignore my letters, I wonder what their excuse will be should they decide to take me to court to obtain a CCJ?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

told you not enter silly letter tennis

and you wasted signed for costs too

simple use free POP from any po desk and a 2nd class  stamp

 

send them a CCA request

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will be unlikely to take you to court, they're simply yanking your chain because you keep writing to them. They know you're scared.

 

As above send them a CCA request, if you're going to send them anything at least make it a legal request for a document.

 

Otherwise simply ignore them, unless you're confident then keep baiting them.

 

And the likelihood of these clowns obtaining a CCJ is even more remote, especially as you're already paying them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...