Jump to content
sunnytoday

bus lane PCN - now bailiffs back after failed appeal - help! £30 now +£400

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm hoping someone can advise me please.

Last month, I received a Notice of enforcement from Jacobs.
It was for a bus lane fine from Jan 2018. I had not been aware of the fine nor sent it in the post.

I called the council straight away and was asked to fill out forms PE2 & PE3, get them witnessed and returned, which I did the next day.

Yesterday I received a letter saying the appeal had been rejected.
I am absolutely devastated, the original fine was £30, the bailiffs are asking for £408.
I called the council and this has already been transferred back to bailiffs.
I called Citizens Advice and they're calling be back on Monday.

I want to pay the original fine and not the bailiff's fees, is there any way to do that?
I'm a single parent and last Friday I was let go of from my job due to restructuring, this couldn't have come at a worse time.

Any advice?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Is the address registered for your car with DVLA - ie, the address shown on the V5C document, the log book - the address where you have been living since January 2018? If you have moved and not told DVLA that would explain why you hadn't received anything.

Edited by Ethel Street

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I moved and it was absolutely my fault for not updating DVLA. Naively, I updated my driving licence straight away and thought it was one and the same. After talking to people about this, I now realise it's not and was a huge mistake on my part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

topic title updated for clarity

 

don't think theres anything you can do sadly.

no-one else bar you have made a mistake.

 the NOE did have your current address on it?

 

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the NOE does have my current address on it.

 

I understand I made a mistake but £408 is a high price to pay for a £30 fine.

Thanks for your help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the NOE was £75

then they came in person so that's another £235

should be £310 + the org fine though I think.

 

dx

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So that's the thing - they never came in person.

The letter says the fine was £98, total £408.

 

But it was the very first letter to me in this address - where did they go in person and can they just charge me for that? Don't they have to prove they did?

 

I live in a large apartment building, they would really struggle to actually get to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good a bit more info.

 

the experts should be around later.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sunnytoday said:

Yes, I moved and it was absolutely my fault for not updating DVLA. Naively, I updated my driving licence straight away and thought it was one and the same. After talking to people about this, I now realise it's not and was a huge mistake on my part.

 

Unfortunately, Out of Time witness statements and statutory declarations are applications that motorists submit to the Traffic Enforcement Centre without so much as knowing what these applications are for and what information should be recorded on them.

 

In simple terms, an Out of Time Statutory Declaration is a request for consideration to be given to CANCELLING the debt registration (including bailiff fees) because something had gone wrong at an earlier stage (such as; documentation being sent to a wrong address). 

 

If the application is accepted, the local authority will then issue a NEW penalty  charge notice to  your correct address. You would then be able to pay the charge at the earlier discounted rate.

 

On both the PE2 and PE3 there is a 'reason' box. What information did you provide in both these boxes?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reasons on the appeal were:
1. I did not receive the fine as I'd moved house
2. I did not receive the subsequent letters for the same reason.
3. I am late because I have only just found out about this from the bailiffs.

 

Again, I realise now that maybe I should have gone into a lot more detail, maybe that's why it was rejected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sunnytoday said:

The reasons on the appeal were:
1. I did not receive the fine as I'd moved house
2. I did not receive the subsequent letters for the same reason.
3. I am late because I have only just found out about this from the bailiffs.

 

 

I know that you now realise that you had not provided anything like enough of an explanation to justify the cancellation of the debt, but I am curious as to WHY you provided so little information. 

 

PS; Please don't beat yourself up about this because well over 65% of Out of Time applications are REFUSED and almost all rejections, are due to the same reason that yours has.....lack of information to support the cancellation of the debt. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply naivety and lack of information/understanding. Never dealt with anything like this before and the council provided no guidance or support.

 

I have been told to submit N244 and try to get the fees wavered.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are my new reasons, if you care to help/advise further:

 

1 - I did not receive the enforcement notice for the original contravention as it went to my previous address (address and moving date included)

 

2 - The warrant of control had my previous address and an enforcement agent took an enforcement step without the authority requesting the issue of a new warrant specifying the new address of the respondent under CPR 75.7(7).

3 - I was not given the NOE from the enforcement agent under the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 s.8(1) as this was sent to my previous address.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, sunnytoday said:

These are my new reasons, if you care to help/advise further:

 

1 - I did not receive the enforcement notice for the original contravention as it went to my previous address (address and moving date included)

 

2 - The warrant of control had my previous address and an enforcement agent took an enforcement step without the authority requesting the issue of a new warrant specifying the new address of the respondent under CPR 75.7(7).

3 - I was not given the NOE from the enforcement agent under the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 s.8(1) as this was sent to my previous address.

 

As your application has (not surprisingly) been refused, you are able to 'seek a review'. Such applications are in fact, few and far between and the reason for this is twofold:

 

Firstly, there is a court fee of up to £255. If you are in receipt of qualifying benefits, you may be exempt from paying all or part of the fees.

 

Secondly, in seeking a 'review' the District Judge is VERY limited indeed into  what he can consider. What you CANNOT do is to try to 'improve' your Out of Time application by attempting to introduce statements that you had not included in your ORIGINAL applications. That is a fact. Accordingly, your 'new comments' outlined above can be ignored.  

 

The Judge would only be able to 'review' what you had initially stated on your PE2 and PE3. 

 

Edited by Bailiff Advice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you then saying that N244 is not worth proceeding with?

I don't seem to have any other choice - I cannot pay £408. I have no other ideas as to how to deal with this, I am trying everything I can think of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bailiff Advice said:

 

 

 

Secondly, in seeking a 'review' the District Judge is VERY limited indeed into  what he can consider. What you CANNOT do is to try to 'improve' your Out of Time application by attempting to introduce statements that you had not included in your ORIGINAL applications. That is a fact. Accordingly, your 'new comments' outlined above can be ignored.  

 

The Judge would only be able to 'review' what you had initially stated on your PE2 and PE3. 

 

 

For visitors reading this thread, the specific regulations regarding a 'review' are outlined under item 6.3 of the Practice Directions supporting Part 75 of the Civil Procedure Rules which state as follows:

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part75/pd_part75#6.1

 
6.3 Attention is drawn to the limited powers of a district judge where a request is made to review an order of a court officer refusing an application for further time for filing a statutory declaration or witness statement.
 
Any review of that order by a district judge will only be a review of the decision to refuse the application for further time for filing a statutory declaration or witness statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, sunnytoday said:

I don't seem to have any other choice - I cannot pay £408. I have no other ideas as to how to deal with this, I am trying everything I can think of.

 

The first thing that you need to think about is your vehicle as this would be the item that a bailiff would be looking to seize. How much is your car worth and is it on finance?

 

Next, you should contact the enforcement company and request that they send you a NEW Notice of Enforcement. The reason why they must do this is because, regulation 8 (1) of the Taking Control of Goods specifically states that such a notice must be sent "to the address  where the debtor usually lives" 

 

When the new notice arrives, the amount should be £173 will will include bailiff fees of  £75. As long  as you contact the enforcement company straight away, you will be able to enter into a short term (usually around 3 months) payment arrangement. 

 

Edited by Bailiff Advice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They say things come in 3s...

 

About 4 weeks ago, right after receiving the NOE, someone drove into my car at the roundabout. The accident was such, that the car was a write off. So I don't have that car any longer.

 

Thank you, I will call the bailiffs with the above advice.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to Jacobs and they refused to remove the £235 or to help in any other way.

They said they were within their rights to charge me that, even though I didn't reside at the address.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sunnytoday said:

Spoke to Jacobs and they refused to remove the £235 or to help in any other way.

They said they were within their rights to charge me that, even though I didn't reside at the address.

 

When was your Statutory Declaration refused. Can you post up a copy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was refused on 20th March.

 

It says:

 

''If you wish to apply for a review of this decision, you should complete an Application Notice form N244. It should be filed within 14 days of the date of service of the Court Officer's Order (I presume that's this letter). For the review, the fee is £255 at the nearest County Court Hearing Centre or £100 by a District Judge. This may incur further costs, you should seek legal advice before proceeding'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is little point in contacting the enforcement company just yet as they would not be aware of the rejection of your application. Also, you are given a 14 day grace period to consider whether to seek a review (of the rejection). 

 

I would suggest waiting a few days. As your vehicle has been written off, you do not have to fear that it will be seized. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I called the council and they said the Bailiffs were informed of the rejection of the appeal on 19th March.

So I'm expecting a letter from them requesting the payment any time now.

 

I think I will go the N244 route with Citizens Advice support. I don't see any other way out currently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, sunnytoday said:

 

I think I will go the N244 route with Citizens Advice support. I don't see any other way out currently.

 

 

Are you in receipt of benefits? If so, you may be exempt from paying the £100 fee. Please do not be tempted to request that the review is heard in open court  (£255 fee). 

Edited by Bailiff Advice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not currently as I am actively seeking work and on garden leave till the end of April.

I was only made redundant last week.

If I find employment asap, then we should be fine.

I will go for the cheaper option, definitely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please give more details about the collection agency. You say that you are able to get something in writing from your ex-partner that you are not responsible. I suggest that you get that immediately. Is your ex-partner prepared to take responsibility for the debt? The jump from £890-£3200 sounds enormous and it sounds to me as if they must've moved this up to the High Court for enforcement. You will get more specialised help soon – but in the meantime send the water company an SAR and get the statement from your ex-partner.  
    • hi. i never actually got any letters from anyone untill i found out about the CCJ then i asked the court for details of who it was from southern water company,  then as soon as i phoned up the collection agency they came around was rude as anything and said they was going to take my stuff.   then told me the bill had gone up from £890 to £3200.  that's when i got a stay at the court, other than that i havnt had any letters at all   
    • Also, without wishing too much to wake up this discussion once again, the above quote is quite wrong. It would be correct if it said:-       So to summarise, the burden of proof is on the dealer to show that the defect was not there – certainly within the first six months. Furthermore, if there is a defect, than the quality/severity of the defect is relevant. It entitles you to your right to reject within 30 days or your right to reject after a failed repair during six months. Only after six months do the normal common law rules of contract come in play. But even then, it is not a question of proving or disproving a defect. It is simply a question of showing that you have not had satisfactory service/quality from the item for a reasonably expected period of time. I would certainly agree that these are very heavy burdens/responsibilities for any dealer. But this is what consumer-facing legislation is all about. It's all about consumer protection and the reason for it is that if you place the burden upon the dealer then it creates a huge incentive upon the dealer to be careful or if the dealer has to source his goods from a manufacturer then it puts pressure on the dealer to put pressure on the manufacturer to make sure that goods are of a sufficient quality. As far as I'm concerned, this is good social planning – and we all benefit – including the car dealer when that car dealer goes off to buy other things such as computers, telephones, music systems, televisions, and even their own vehicle. It encourages quality control at source – and this is highly desirable and is only achievable by having this kind of consumer legislation.
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...