Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm looking over it now and will do it this weekend.   The parts asking for phone number and mail, I dont specifically want to give those out as they're for family use only.. Can I forgo those?
    • Can talktalk pass on a debt that was in dispute?   Is there a template I can send back? They shoulve have ALL the information anyway seeing as they took the debt over.   Not only that, I didnt get notified by talktalk that a debt was being passed on.
    • follow post 4 here:   The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims is made by the Master of the Rolls as Head of Civil Justice. 1st Oct 2017 - Legal - Consumer Action Group
    • if you read the letter carefully you'll see its nothing to do with talk talk anymore the debt has been sold to JCI who are the stated client on the BW letter   you must reply within 30 days.    
    • Thanks for your reply . The only contact i have had with Goskippy is when i first reported the accident. They took the details of the accident then said ' thanks for letting us know'. They have never contacted me afterwards. I did however contact goskippy a few weeks ago as i felt AX were messing me about. And go skippy told me its nothing to do with them as AX is dealing with it.   Secondly, yes that's right. When they first contacted me asking if i want a hire car, obviously my first question was ' how much is that going to cost me?' Her exact words were, nothing because your insurance covers it. ( the reason why i agreed to the hire car) . Now, their words are ' we are pushing for admiral to pay for the hire car but if we are unsuccessful then we will wipe the cost off and you will not be liable , considering you stick to your hire car agreement and you work with us on your claim' .   I had to sign documents before they delivered the hire car but she explained over the phone the documents were just for me to sign that i would agree to be liable for any damage i did to the car, had to give the car back with a full tank of fuel, i would agree to pay for it valeting if i left the inside a mess ect) obviously i did not mind agreeing to these conditions as of course its my responsibility if i damaged the car or leave the inside a mess ( which i wouldn't anyway) . stupidly i believed what she said and did not read through all the documents before signing them 
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies
  • Recommended Topics

drydensfairfax-Nat West loan


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 703 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

In 2011 Nat west were granted a charging order on my house for a debt of £7000. I have been paying Nat west as per the court order and the debt is now £3500. The debt is now sold to Drydens fairfax. what happens to a charging order if the debt is sold? And how much could I expect to offer for a full and final on this and get the order rescinded?

 

Edited by bolly1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, bolly1 said:

In 2011 Nat west were granted a charging order on my house for a debt of £7000. I have been paying Nat west as per the court order and the debt is now £3500. The debt is now sold to Drydens fairfax. what happens to a charging order if the debt is sold? And how much could I expect to offer for a full and final on this and get the order rescinded?

 

 

 

Who took you to court in 2011 ...was it Nat West themselves ?  And who was you paying Nat West Direct or Irwin Mitch / Ascent legal ?

 

The Charging Order remains the same in the name of the Original judgment Claimant until such time the new owner updates it or is required to update it.

 

Give them a ring and make an offer.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Drydens are not a good company to deal with. The most they paid for the debt  would be 700 pounds  so do not offer them much more than around 1200 pounds. They cannot charge you more than 3500 pounds since you are paying a Court order.

If they don't play ball say that you will carry on paying at 500 pa. Also bear in mind that whatever figure you agree with them they may still pass the remainder of the debt on to a debt collector. therefore get it in writing that they won't do that or it's no deal.

While trying to do your deal they will hassle you, email you many many times, threaten to tell your friends on Facebook etc.

If they try any of that come back for more advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nat West took me to court, I was first paying them, then Shakespeare Putman and now Drydensfairfax. Would £1500 do it or this that too much?

 

Ok sorry just read the other post, will try £1200. So do Drydensfairfax now "own" the charging order or can I apply to have it gone as Nat West have no interest?

Edited by bolly1
Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldnt offer them a penny unless theyve been named on the court order.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the home jointly owned?

Debt just yours?

 

Drydens dont buy debts

Who are their clients

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

jointly owned, the debt was mine but came out of a joint bank account. My husband never had his wages put into that account or even used it

Edited by bolly1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So reading between the lines its just the Solicitor that you make payment to that has changed and Natwest still own the debt and Judgment ?

 

You was paying Shakespeare Putman  (Nat West was the claimant  Shakespeare Putman were the Solicitors)  Shakespeare Putman have informed you yo now start paying

Drydens fairfax ......and the Judgment claimant remains as Nat West ...or have you actually received a Notice of Assignment from Nat West telling you they have sold the debt toa DCA ?

 

Jointly owned property means it a Restriction type K so the restriction is only placed on your share of the property.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont think so...just the payee...never assume it makes an ass........:D

 

Judgment claimant/Charging Order = Nat West

 

Solicitor to make payment to = Drydens fairfax 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a restriction k who says you have to pay anything!!

If you sell you dont tell them..you dont have too

 

Ill post alink later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, bolly1 said:

'So shall I make the offer to Nat West and still go for £1200

You have been paying them for 8 years and nothing materially has changed apart from who collects payments..the charge secures the judgment...why would they have to consider a Full & Final Offer...they have their security anyway ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

don't think so no..its  restriction k

not being funny but why do you need to release valuable money in an asset, never a good idea..

not going o use it to pay off debt are you?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no just thinking about any future help for my daughter and was curious to know. Thank you for your help, I really appreciate it

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good for you.

strange the judge ordered you to pay a restriction k.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP is not paying the Restriction.....paying the Judgment CCJ

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you are complying with the judgment payment arrangements...the restriction just sits their as security against the judgment..until either paid or you wish to sell the property.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear... they cant force house sale on a restriction k so saying..nothing can happen to the home whilst i pay ...is wrong..youve been led up the garden path by someone....

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...