Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Failed SAR's - Help Required


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1863 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

I sent a bunch of SAR's off on behalf of my friend and two haven't responded. 

 

M&S - wrote to ask her to call them to confirm her new address (they wanted to speak to her via telephone even though they had a copy of council tax bill and all addresses for the past 20 years) and have heard nothing since.

 

Santander - for GE Capital re Dorothy Perkins Storecard - no reply whatsoever....

 

What is the best course of action now? 

 

I know both companies have the online complaint form for PPI - is it worth giving that a go?

 

Thank you in advance

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please have a look at the following link – GDPR.

Can you tell us a little bit more about the request to M&S – when it was made – when they called and what happened during the call?

Can you also tell us about the request that you made of Santander – did you use one of our templates? When did you send the request et cetera.

Do you presently have an account with M&S and do you presently have an account with Santander?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

Yes of course. 

M&S Sar was sent on 14/01, they replied on 01/02 and asked my friend to contact them confirm the change of address in person which she did. The call was rather odd because the person she initially spoke to took the details and went through personal info then put her on hold after she explained what she was calling for, she was on hold for around 15 mins when another person answered who knew nothing about the first conversation so my friend was concerned about who she’d spoken to especially as she’d gone through security etc. The second person assured her all was ok and that the details were up to date but since then we’ve heard nothing!! 

 

Santander - the request was sent on exactly the same day, 14/01 and yes using the sites SAR template but we’ve heard nothing at all from this one. 

 

I’m fairly certain she doesn’t have an account with Santander (that’s the one for Dorothy Perkins/Ge Capital that was) and I don’t think she does M&S either. 

Shes got old statements showing PPI from Dorothy Perkins but if they don’t respond how do we pursue it? 

 

Thank you

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Search store card ppi

go after the underwriters

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no satans bank are the creditor, as ge is now part of them since the abbey buy out etc, they didn't provide the ins for the ppi

try "ge card ppi"

with quotes in our search box top right.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Satans bank' - love that!! I will have a good look this evening and see what info i can find - would be a shame if we can't do anything when there is clear PPI on the paperwork...

 

On another note i finished going through the statements for the PPI on the other accounts last night (around 1am actually lol) so I'm ready to move onto to a spreadsheet once i know which one to use, I have posted about that too but no replies so far. I will add that to my research list too :-) 

 

Thank you again for the help 

Link to post
Share on other sites

for cards use our cisheet whilst they are charging their interest

for loans use our  statint sheet

all in my sig below..

 

any ppi complaint must be accompanied by an fos cq

see the fca ppi link on their site.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Failed SAR's - Help Required
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...