Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax LO after their errors *** Cancelled***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

this is a long post but I’ll try to keep it brief.

 

Back last year I got behind on my council tax payments

set up a payment plan before it was taken to court.

 

They laid out the plan in a letter with payments dated every month from Aug 18 - Jan 19 but there was 2 payments in Jan.

I didn’t think anything of it until it got to the beginning of Jan (payment day was the 15th)

 

I called to see if it was one payment or 2 as they were the same date and I was assured that it was only one payment and that Jan was the LAST payment on the plan and it was a typing error.

that was all paid.

 

Didn’t think anything of it until a notice came through the door saying that I had missed Feb 19 payment of £89.

I called them,

discussed it all,

 

they said there wasn’t a typo their end and that feb was the last payment  (I’m guessing it had been pointed out and amended) and paid it a few days later yet mistakenly paid them £85 instead of £89.

 

Yesterday I received a court summons for £79 which is the missed £4 and £75 court fees but surely the missed payment of £89 isn’t my fault as it wasn’t on the payment plan in the first place and not once after my phone call was I sent a revised letter with the amended plan on.

 

Does anyone know if there is any way I can ask for copies of all the letters they have sent me since that letter in July?  

I’ve still got my copy of the payment plan but I want to see if they have changed it.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

SAR time

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

they said there wasn’t a typo their end and that feb was the last payment  (I’m guessing it had been pointed out and amended) and paid it a few days later yet mistakenly paid them £85 instead of £89. 

 

 

The problem here though is that you paid short and that is the cause of the summons - although the letter had a typo on the date they still waited until after the February instalment date before they took action - so, in effect, you had longer to pay than your letter suggested. If it had been the other way round then you would have been at a detriment due to their error (i.e if they said Feb for the last payment but it was actually Jan) and had more of an argument.

 

If the payment of £89 had been made by the February date then the summons could not have proceeded but due to the £4 shortfall then it would appear that the council have acted correctly and could proceed with the summons.

Depending on what letters you received, and what they said, there may by a technical defence but it's unlikely.

 

 

Edited by ss002d6252
Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t pay short that is the thing, I’ve been paying more than they were asking for and my last payment according to the lady I spoke to on the phone was the 15th of Jan which I paid 2 days after I spoke to her on the phone which was around the 1st week of January? I’ve checked my bank statements against the letter and every single payment on the plan has been made and paid. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally you had payments due until either Jan or Feb. You contacted the council who clarified that the final payment was in Feb and not 2 due in Jan.

 

When the payment of £89 was due for Feb you stated that you paid £85 so the payment was short by £4, the amount on the summons.

 

What were the payment dates/amounts and what does your bank show for each of these? Unless you'd paid more than was due by the Feb date then you'd be short if you did not pay the full Feb instalment amount to settle the remaining balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be able to dispute the summons on a legislative technicality but it won't remove the fact that the council tax charge would still be due if it was not paid.

 

If the summons could be argued against successfully then they can simply issue a revised demand notice for the outstanding balance.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I can’t be bothered with all of the rigmarole, I just wanted to know the rights I had in regards to copies of the letters that I have been sent since and including the day I was sent the payment plan but they are all being sent and should be here next week. 

 

The summons was my own fault as I didn’t pay enough on the last payment but as I’ve stated that payment isn’t on my payment plan. I only knew of it when I received a letter last week telling me I had missed it,  so I called them

to find that the Feb payment was my last payment yet when I called in January I was assured January’s payment was only one payment and that was the last one on the plan. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can certainly dispute with then regarding what you state you were told and ask that they remove the summons but if they don't there's not a lot that can be done.

They've do seems to have done it in an odd way anyway by though by the sounds of it as it doesn't sounds like the letter you received was a demand notice but a hand typed arrangement letter (which they made the typo on). For them to rely on this then there, prior to the summons, must have been a reminder or final notice that was defaulted on - the problem comes in that it may have been issued some time ago and they chose not to issue the summons until Feb. When the letters comes through take a good look at the reminder or final notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn’t a notice, it was literally just  a typed payment plan. I’ve not received any letter since then until the defaulted payment letter last week, and my next council tax demand that has come through the post this morning. I don’t throw letters away which is why I asked for copies of any sent between aug and now, just in case there was any I’ve missed or thrown. 

 

Its all so confusing, 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What seems to have happened as a best guess* is that at some point you defaulted on the original demand notice and a reminder/final notice was then defaulted on. Rather than go straight to a summons they suspended the issuing of it and gave you another payment arrangement.

 

This arrangement had to be a manual one as its outside of how most council tax systems bill as standard. Once you had, for whatever reason, failed the manual arrangement they then released the summons they had held. The summons would then be issued for whatever balance remained due.

 

 

* it's permissable but in over a decade of working in council tax I've not known one do it this way as its far too fiddly and can go wrong too easily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I haven’t replied.

 

Just a quick update,

 

I called Monday asking for a copy of the letter that I was sent.

It was waiting for me when I got home from work today,  

 

opened it and it’s sent on the same date as the letter I have only my payment plans changed and instead of January 2019 x 2 which is on my letter it’s January, February 2019

 

I called them and explained that this letter they sent recently and the original letter I received were different and the lovely guy I spoke to cancelled the summons fee as not only was it a ridiculous amount but as I have the original letter with the typo it would have been wiped anyway (his words) so I only have the £4 to pay. This is why I keep all the letters from CT I’ve ever been sent. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done that man. :)

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

so we can mark this as LO cancelled then?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

delete ? for what reason?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Council Tax LO after their errors **WON LO CANCELLED**

That would be pointless as we would have no record of past successes .....or any reason for this forum :confused:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Council Tax LO after their errors *** Cancelled***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...