Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lending Stream now Lantern


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1229 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can I inquire re-reading the comments despite my opening post 

 

I can still complain to the original lender about poor lending? Even though the debts have been sold on or does that not matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the real problem...

both the above have already been answered before..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There were posts above form someone else that have now been removed & made it conflicting.
 

Reading the thread I still don’t understand if I can or not - and don’t want to upset the Apple cart with then if I do. I’m not trying to be difficult and apologise if it comes across that way

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is not correct that an IRL complaint goes to a debt buyer.

always the OC, our relevant guide clearly states that.

 

but have you not already sent them an irl complaint?

they replied

but you left it outside of 6mts to fwd to the FOS so are out of time now?

 

what are you worried about?

you wrote to MMF

they have your correct address

and have done norhing further to date?

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I complained once years ago over email and this is where they cancelled two of them I believe.

 

so I’m asking can I send your letter still and see what comes off it to LS?

 

Also with CCA, how do I obtain it for the other accounts? I believe their letter mixed them together and only listed one account number

Link to post
Share on other sites

why have MMF been recently chasing you then?

 

if you did not send an IRL complaint to LS regarding each loan....then I see no reason why not? 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

MMF I believe took them over or bought them from LS.

 

I did send a complaint to LS in 2016 via email, I think it may have been Irresponsible Lending I can't be sure I don't have that email only there reply which is in the opening post.

 

I have thus far heard nothing from MMF since the sent the first agreement posted

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/03/2019 at 21:40, adam1992 said:

 

Loan ID Borrowed Amount Total Paid Remaining Borrowed Amount
A £120.00 £86.48 £33.52
B £120.00 £19.28 £100.72
C £140.00 £0.00 £140.00

 

 

as far as I can see you poss owe MMF approx. £700

but as they've not complied with enforceable agreements on loan A/B/C ?

and you've already written not emailed them not emailed a CCA request with regard to one of the above?

and you've not moved since?

 

stuff and all they can do.

just do not ignore a letter of claim or if you've moved since the one CCA.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lantern Contacted Me about a £50 LS debt.

The CCA I requested came 10/2019

- and didn't have my name/address/account number..etc..

which advise was unenforceable above.

 

After that a few days later they sent me a new letter stating I now had multiple accounts with them and totalling £940

these included the LS figures but one of them was supposed to have been cancelled by LS per the email

and another was lower than the balance Lantern are stating per that email too.

I'm guessing LS sold the debts on without removing the interest that they said they were doing for repayment..

 

I don't know what loan I CCA'd for now (i have the lantern letter but it doesn't have an account number from LS on it)  as the figure is completely different and is one of the two that should of been cancelled looking at it. 

 

I have an account breakdown from Lantern with 4 original creditor references on.

 

A month later in December they sent me an offer of 50% off the balance if I paid £400-500.

I'm just confused because they've bunched everything together and probably haven't explained well to you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what was suspected then

latern have simple merged them all and given it a ref number from them.

 

if they are offering 50% discount, then that's a very good indicator they've nowt to enforce

it would be better if you blocked and did not use email ever again

simply gives them a freeway to harass you.

 

pers i'd ignore them until/unless you get a letter of claim.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry if its been asked but have you moved since taking these out with LS?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But have YOU written legally informing anyone of this

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I sent the CCA request back to MMF who then sent me what was posted in the thread earlier on. Is this not enough for knowing this is my address?

 

They found me, I replied from said address, they replied again.

 

Or do I need to write them a formal letter as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no that's perfect

was on a small screen

couldn't scroll back easy.

 

yours is not the next move...if any..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

well failed the CCA request then.

 

as my last  post

 

time to get reading up here on CAG too adam!

CAG is self help as well.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

DX

 

after reading I’m just ignoring calls & such as that seems the right action.

 

as they will be coming up next year to being Statue Barred I understand this goes from the last date of payment.

 

does my complaint to the original lender effect this?

Edited by adam1992
Link to post
Share on other sites

a cca request is not acking a debt.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Update:

 

My lending complaint was rejected as they’d already responded to a complaint a few years ago which I didn’t realise (old Email).
 

In my complaint I noted they still hadn’t removed accounts as they said in the reply to the original complaint and added interest but this didn’t seem to get answered..

 

They removed 2 accounts from my credit file during the past two months and just today added them back on..


I also notice the address is still incorrect on the account on my credit file. But as I sent the CCA & they responded to my current address I’m assuming I’m fine in that regard.

 

gues it’s a waiting game now

Edited by adam1992
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...