Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TFL Fare Evasion Prosecution - losing job - help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1758 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 10 March 2019, I used other people’s oyster seasonal travel card on London Underground (zone2 to zone1) and got caught by a TFL inspector.

 

I thought I should cooperate, so I admit that the card owner did not use on that day so I took owner’s oyster seasonal travel card on my TFL journey. 

 

Inspector asked if I had a valid pass at all, I said no.

I was further asked if I had money to finish off my journey, I said yes I could use contactless bankcard.

 

the inspector took my personal details and called someone to validated my address and asked me to sign on writing notes. 

The inspector did not ask if this was my first time using other’s card.

 

I received first standard TFL letter on 12 March 2019 (option 1 deny committing an offence, option 2 accept and provide exceptional reasons for TFL not to prosecute),

 

I intend to accept committing the offence and state below exceptional reasons begging TFL not to prosecute.

 

I work in a profession where a criminal conviction means losing job immediately and ban from industry for life (as I have to report immediately after I got the conviction), therefore losing right to remain in the UK.

 

I understand TFL is almost certain to prosecute, please help regarding any chance as to settle out of court to keep my job?

 

Should I use solicitor to polish my return email to TFL letter?

 

And if I should use solicitor on the court day?

 

Letter needs to be replied before 22 March 2019.

 

Thank you in advance for all your suggestions and advices!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Single offence you should be ok

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply.

In fact it might not.

This was my first time caught but might not first time to use (is it safe to say actually details here?)

 

 but I was not asked about on the day caught and I understand TFL might further ask me for interview?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No interviews no.

if it was a pattern of use they'll spot it dont try an lie. Youll be worse off

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No its not!!

Best id is read the threads here

There was a win regarding job loss this week

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you!

was that single or multiple offence?

is it safe to discuss everything here or may I PM you? I am devastated and really need more detailed help

 

1) after sincere apologies and mitigating circumstances shall i offer voluntary fine of £xxx plus any other fees incurred to tfl?

 

2) i need to go back to home country in mid April and return mid May,  genuinely to take care one of my relatives who don't have others to rely on.

 

Shall i mentioned this in my first response to ask if a summons to be issued, could it be after mid May so to avoid the situation that I cannot receive letters by post during this time period? thanks in advance

 

Appreciate dx's replies so far,

a couple more Qs along with the above

 

1) should I mention and admit multiple misuse offences for few weeks in my written response to TFL's first standard letter even if I was not asked at all?

 

2) Any chance card owner will be fined/prosecuted?

I want to make sure friend is 100% not involved in the case

 

3) After my response email (or should I both email and post the same physical letter to them?),

 

what's next?

Will there any TFL correspondences before I receive a court summons?

 

What's the quickest turn around time for me to receive summons?

(as I really need to be out of the UK from Mid April to Mid May 2019)

 

4) After summons, I choose plead guilty and attend - show remorse and mitigation like losing job and t and ban from my professional body (I need to check exact policy - do I need written evidence to show these on court?) 

 

All comments/suggestions welcomed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

1) Old-Codja who is an advisor here from time to time says that you don't need to tell them things they don't know already.

 

2) This is only a guess, but if you haven't said that your friend offered you the card I would think they won't have a problem.

 

3) I would email and send a letter, unless TfL have told you otherwise.

 

4) I think you would have to show evidence, otherwise they could think you were inventing this to avoid a criminal record.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you HB

 

I recall I was intimated by inspector so I admitted my intention to use other's travelcard and was recorded on note.

 

Is this going to be determining factor/differences compared to those never admitted intention?

 

Does is mean they have enough evidence to give me other charges on top of TfL Railway Byelaw?

And I have no chance for settlement at all? What's maximum sentence if on other possible charges?

 

also I was tried to read below thread but it says page does not exists - it would be really helpful if I could have a read of this below case and how it settled

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?456947-TFL-misuse-Freedom-Pass-more-than-once-**-SETTLED-BEFORE-COURT-**

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure where you are getting these 'extra; charges from they can add on.

you need to settled down and stop panicking.

 

so you appear to be indicating there is a pattern of fraudulent use..., so they will spot it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see you've read this

 

its a very good guide

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you dx - yes I have been panicked for the past few days and really need to pull myself together.

 

I know they will spot the pattern and as I admitted on the day that I was consciously knowing the misuse and understood that was wrong 

 

Is this "honesty" actually let this case being worse off? As they have written evidence of my knowingly misuse so they can charge me fraud or something more serious than purely fare evasion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cannot prosecute for fraud.

they are a train company.

they can only use byelaws contraventions ….breaking of which..the net result of your fraudulent use.

 

you sent me a pm, I cannot and will not advise by pm as it helps no-ne bar you.

not what cag is about..else you'd not have found the threads related to here.

 

the info in the pm should be on this topic as it will help others...regardless of your individual outcome...but you use repeated use is not outside what we know has gained OOC in the past.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you dx for the info

when i did a free consultation with a 'specialised' solicitor he refuse to take on my case

 

he said OOC with tfl is almost impossible after Feb 2018 when they changed their internal policy to try to procesutor everyone for public interest

 

OCC before feb 2018 with TFL and OCC with private rail company until now are not uncommon

 

do you have the feeling/knowledge that TFL OCC dramatically decreased after Feb18?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I am aware of potential Byelaws prosecution by TFL

 

Some gave me advice that more serious Regulation of Railways Act offence of failing to pay the fare due, with intent to avoid payment thereof is usually used by TFL in such cases?

 

Any ideas on this Regulation of Railways Act offence? It it much worse off? Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no such cases of this on CAG

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Dx and HB so far for your great help.

 

I work for a client-facing consultancy firm and policy/contract around "criminal conviction" and "dismissal" is quite vague so I may not get a definite written evidence showing that criminal conviction=losing job

 

but there is a line in contract saying my continued employment is subject to fit and proper status 

and I need to fill in fit and proper form annually where under "Good character and reputation section", I will be asked question "have you been convicted of any offence in a court of law (subject to 1974 RoOA")

 

I am pretty sure if convicted i will lose my job as most clients need me to demonstrate Good character and reputation. So I won't be fit and proper anymore 

 

The hard thing is how to prove all above as strong evidence to TFL to consider? Is it advised to use a solicitor purely to prove these? Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

See that won thread

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Dx

Yes that case was relying on HR's written letter to directly prove conviction=lose job

 

But it's really hard for a big firm's HR to produce such a definitive statement like this

 

As our firm policy tends to be vague and "case by case"  where in a case like mine - the result would be losing job.

 

Any advice/suggestion would be appreciated!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop looking to make excuses for them to refuse you. 

there was a policy change yes

I referred to this before

but OOC has happened twice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you dx

 

what do you think a suitable offer looks like to financially compensate TFL?

 

Is the number I should offer on my letter being my week's income+all unpaid fares+all related admin costs?

Edited by greygoat
Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't 

we've never said do that

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nowhere here do we say state any amount

example letter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx - I don't think I will receive the definite answer from HR before my reply to TFL.

 

In this case, should I say "I will lose my job" or "I will highly likely to lose job"

 

If I say the former, but cannot provide definite evidence later on, would this be considered as a deliberate lie?

 

If I only say "highly likely to lose job" - will TFL not to even consider settlement at all, due to the fact that I misused for 70+ journeys?

 

it is almost guaranteed I will lose my job as it is a condition of my contract that I must retain a  fit and proper status 

this is check via a  form annually, where under "Good character and reputation section",  I will be asked the question "have you been convicted of any offence in a court of law (subject to 1974 RoOA")

 

the above wording is just amazing!

 

sorry English is not my first language so both my written and oral English need to be improved.

 

HR confirmed that we will not provide any written evidence regarding if I will lose job.

 

I am certainly very regretful and show remorse and won't commit such offence again in my letter 

 

Should I ever mention I will lose uk visa if I lose my job?

Or just mention the job bit but not the visa thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...