Jump to content


Lantern/chapman claimform - old Quick Quid PDL debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1868 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last July Wilkin Chapman issued a claim against me

I responded with my defence

 

as far as can remember sent back the court papers

once they arrived agreeing to mediation

heard nothing

until this week.

 

I’ve attached the covering letter for you to see.

 

Can they take this long to reply and what do I do next?

 

l can upload the rest of the information if required.

 

Thanks

Untitled_1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we have the relevant details please

 

and post up the defence you filed too

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lantern/chapman claimform - old Quick Quid PDL debt

the claim is stayed - you need to do nothing

did you start an irresponsible lending complaint to QQ - if not why not??

as they likely would have written it off as they did with 10'000 of people before they went bust.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you have

when the court wrote t you thanking you for the defence filing.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get an IRL claim going to QQ or their administrators as they've gone bust

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the words of Brian Blessed & Marcus Brigstock from HIGNFY....

 

STOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!

 

Quickquid are fine... They haven't gone into administration... 

Wonga have... However I wouldnt dilly dally around though... 

 

Rumour is that QQ are facing challenging times

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

aw sorry wishful thinking...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your advice.

 

Just to put my mind at rest, I’ve got nothing to worry about then? I can’t find any of the relevant letters at the moment but I guess as they’ve included my defence in the the letter I uploaded then the courts must of received it and sent it to them.

And am I right in thinking that it’s stayed because they didn’t pursue it in time and that if they wanted to take it to court again they would have to pay to have the stay lifted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct they had 28days

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...