Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I have not. I will probably do that
    • Based on ECP's previous, what will definitely happen is this. They will send more idiotic letters. After they will send a Letter of Claim, and it is essential that your brother replies at this point to this to show them he would be big trouble in court. Next it is highly likely (but not certain) that they will crawl back under their stone and that will be the end of the matter. The slight worry is that if they do do court it will seem a likely story to a judge that your brother has no connection to the ticket, when it was him who appealed and replied to the Letter of Claim.  Indeed I think it would seem the lot of you were playing games with ECP and with the court by getting unconnected people involved and then later deny they were involved. So be aware there is that slight risk. You talked about "a mess" in your first post, and you weren't wrong. Someone hires a car and gets a ticket.  There is an appeal.  Who appeals, the hirer?  No, the hirer's mate's son.  Obvious! There is an approach for help to a consumer website.  By the hirer?  No, by the hirer's mate's son's brother! This is so damn silly and totally avoidable. Anyway, it seems the decision has been made for your brother to carry the can so whatever consequences will ensue will ensue. 
    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2x 100mph in 90 mins by same camera


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1865 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

Hi i was entering a dual CARRIAGEWAY and seen a row of traffic travelling along the carriageway was.

 

So to get in front to pull on and not have to disrupt traffic flow, i put my foot down to enter CARRIAGEWAY first.

 

As soon as i entered CARRIAGEWAY i went under a bridge.

 

On the bridge was a speed camera van and it clocked me at 102mph.

I have a rs4 so it gets up to speed quickly. 

 

As soon as i was on CARRIAGEWAY and under bridge i slowed back down.

(I dont drive at that speed and to be honest was unaware i was at that speed)

i didn't see the camera as it was behind me. 

 

However on the way back home i was in right hand lane passing slower moving traffic when i realised i wasn't going to make my exit unless i sped up to pass..... this time i seen the camera van but it was too late. Got me at 107mph.

 

All this in 90 mins. I made the wrong choices i know this. But i don't drive like this usually.

I need my license for my job.

Any advise  please?

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but twice at +100MPH doesn't sound like you are a sensible driver..habit..just got caught this time.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I was asking for advice not a remember fmy mistake . 

I used pwer to ger in front for seconds. 

I have no points. 

70mph limit and i pushed it to make my entrance and exit quicker .

Thats not as bad as people speeding on a 30/40mph single carriageway for no reason surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

Here's a link to the Magistrates' Guidelines that tells you how they treat speeding offences. Unless you have mitigating circumstances, I think they're going to take a tough approach.

https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/speeding-revised-2017/

You could try ringing a couple of local motoring lawyers and see what they think. They should talk to you initially without charging, to see if they think they can help. You can find specialists via the Law Society website.

http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may find this online guide useful.

https://www.traveline.info/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was reaching out for my mistake not lecturing.

Its my fault.

But its not habit

i drive a van monday to friday.

And use 1 or 2 for a couple of hours at weekends.

Its the wifes car mainly.

Im 35 not 18.

Just a few seconds to save time not racing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the same token you should at all times be aware of your surroundings and taken into consideration that your turnoff was within the next mile or so unless you were "foot flat down" type of driver that liked to weave in and out and did not take surroundings into account. 

 

This is the way the magistrate may look at it and make it very difficult to for the magistrate to find any extenuating or mitigating circumstances.  This is probably going to be a very heavy fine and loss of driving licence.  Unfortunately it will also push up your car insurance premiums in years to come as the fact that you are selling the car will not count in your favour.

 

This will be a very hard one to fight even for a top class solicitor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

could be a mitigating fact then.?

also proof you hadn't been that way before ?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When hearing two offences together they should look at totality - hitting you with 6 points on each would be a straight totting up ban for 12 pts so 6 months minimum ban unless good reason (exceptional hardship) can be shown not to implement it.  I'd expect for totality you'll probably get the Band C fine and a ban rather than a points & totting up but the bench/DJ has the final say.

 

Going 100+ to overtake so as to hit an exit is not going to give a good view to the bench/DJ over the standard of driving - even if it was just a one off.

Edited by ss002d6252
Link to post
Share on other sites

Two different offences on two different parts of the road so probably will be treated as such. 

 

A 100mph plus as far as I am aware is a ban however it happening twice may increase the length of the ban. 

 

Even if you do not get a ban and only get points you need to notify the insurance company straight away and you may find the premiums will jump up considerably unless you are very lucky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You face a steep uphill struggle with this.

 

The “totality” principle mentioned above applies if two offences are committed on the same occasion (for example, if you were caught speeding and with no insurance).  It will not be applicable in your case. The offences are individual and committed on separate occasions on a different stretch of road. Each of the offences attracts either a ban of up to 56 days or 6 points. If the court has in mind to ban you for each of the individual offences the bans will run concurrently, so you are unlikely to be banned for more than 56 days. If six points are the outcome for each then this puts you immediately on twelve and so liable to a six month ban for “totting up”.

 

So what can you do about this? If you receive twelve points you are entitled to argue that “exceptional hardship” (EH) will result for either you or others if you are banned. The hardship has to be “exceptional” and losing one’s job is not generally considered so (anybody needing to drive to earn a living will face such hardship). Does anybody else rely on you being able to drive and/or earn a living?  If you are banned (rather than receive points) for the individual offences you have no right to make such an argument.

 

In some respects points are a better option because you have the opportunity to make an EH argument. The downside is that if you are unsuccessful with that argument you face a longer ban than if you are simply banned for the individual offences.

 

You will also receive a fine of a week’s net income for each offence, a single “victim surcharge” of 10% of one of the fines (Min £30, Max £170) and £85 costs (all this assumes guilty pleas). The matters will almost certainly be dealt with initially by a “Single Justice” sitting alone, deciding the matter on papers and you will be notified of the hearing by means of a “Single Justice Procedure Notice”. They have six months from the date of the offences to begin this and in most areas they take all of that. You cannot attend that hearing but since a ban will be a strong consideration the SJ will almost certainly adjourn your matter for a hearing in the normal Magistrates’ Court and you will be asked to attend.

 

Make sure you complete and return the "request for driver's details" (also known as the "Section 172 notice") within the 28 days allowed. Failure to do so means you commit a separate offence for which the penalty is also six points.

Edited by Man in the middle
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Man in the middle said:

 

My wife works in Birmingham and has to leave early each day. I do the school run as no one else to help. We also have a baby that i take and fetch from child minder, if i have any work on. (Currently none). Otherwise i look after baby. We live in a village so school is not walking distance and no school bus and the same case for child minder. And as and when i get a job i travel to all different locations.  So its not like i can get a lift to a permanent place of work either! Never had any points and ive been driving since 2001. Just a bad day. I already take medication for depression and have counselling. This is seriously going to impact that! 

Thanks to all with advice.  I genuinely don't drive like an idiot. Just 1 really bad day. I hit them speeds for seconds, selfishly to make my entrance and exit. 

Thanks again guy's. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Also as my business not been doing well i have literally just started a business Facebook page and agreed with a local bathroom store to start sending me enquiries....... then this happens. Typical!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eddie.

 

I've removed a couple of quotes from your last two posts because it made the thread quite long to read. If you're replying to the most recent post, you just need to type in the box below it rather than hitting Quote. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get your thoughts together, as you have outlined above, and prepare an EH argument. Concentrate on the effect on others (this usually carries more weight) and emphasise the lack of alternatives available. You can write it down and read it to the court or simply ask the Magistrates to read it to themselves (suggest you are not confident with public speaking). As I said, you have plenty of time as it is unlikely to reach court for a number of months.

 

One other thought - I don't know if you've replied to the Section 172 requests yet, but if not it's worth a punt to enclose them in the same envelope together with a begging letter asking them to consider treating them as a a single offence. You don't really have the grounds for them to do so, but worth a try and it will cost you nothing apart from a bit of time.

Edited by Man in the middle
Link to post
Share on other sites

keep us updated please

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...