Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LOWELL claim form - old provident doorstep loan poss SB'd ***Claim Discontinued***


Nibbles83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1754 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello im very sorry to bother you guys  but im not sure where to go with this .

yesterday i recived the claim form from the county court business center .

lowell brought a old provident account .....

ive this morning rang provident to get a last payment date but they are just giving me the run around and said they will send the request to CCST (CUSTOMOR CONTACT SUPPORT)

provident state the only information they can give me is that the count was sold in 2014,

when checking my credit file its listed under lowel and defaulted arrcording to the credit report the account was started on :12/10/2012

and default on the 3/6/2013 then sold to lowel in 2014 .

as far as i can remeber i only ever made 1 may 2 payments towards this allegde debt . ive had no contact with provident in years and ive never had any contact with lowel over said debt

i was working but since 2013 i became ill spent alot of time on the sick from 2014/15 being dismissed in 2017

im on benefits and really cant affort to pay this .

any help would be apprecated at this point the issue date for the claim is 5th /3rd/2019

yours kindly Nibbles 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome to CAG

I have moved your thread to the Financial Legal Issues Forum in view of the court claim.Please continue to post here to your thread.

Please read the following link and then copy the Q,s and your responses back here so we have all the details to advise on how to proceed.

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Andy thanks for the welcome hope ive done this correctly please bare with me if i havnt been awhile since ive to learn something new lol

 

 Name of the Claimant ?
LOWELL PORTFOLIO l LTD
ELLINGTON HOUSE 9 SAVANNAH WAY LEEDS WEST YORKSHIRSHIRE LS10 1AB.

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.
ISSUE DATE 05/03/2019

 

Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total) - UNSURE OF THIS (SORRY )

 

^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total

 

Particulars of Claim
1) THE Defendant entered into a consumer credit act 1974 regulated agreement with provident personal credit limited under acount xxxxxxxx (the agreement)
2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and arrears began to accrue.
3) The agreement was later assigned to the claiment on 29/08/2014 and notice given to the defendant.
4) despite repeated request for payment the sum of £4,452.00 remains due and outstanding.
and the claimant claims
a)the said sum of £4,452.00
b) interest pursuant to s69 county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to date of issue, accuring at a daily rate of £0.976, but limited to one year , being £356.16
c) Costs

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down.

1) THE Defendant entered into a consumer credit act 1974 regulated agreement with provident personal credit limited under acount xxxxxxxx (the agreement)
2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and arrears began to accrue.
3) The agreement was later assigned to the claiment on 29/08/2014 and notice given to the defendant.
4) despite repeated request for payment the sum of £4,452.00 remains due and outstanding.
and the claimant claims
a)the said sum of £4,452.00
b) interest pursuant to s69 county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to date of issue, accuring at a daily rate of £0.976, but limited to one year , being £356.16
c) Costs

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ?
NO
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?
NO

 

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? NO ... still at the same address

 

What is the total value of the claim?

£5073.16

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?
LOAN OLD PROVIDENT ACCOUNT

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?
CREDIT FILE START DATE : 12/10/2012

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ?
YES / NOODLE

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.
not the original creditor no LOWELL BROUGH THE ACCOUNT ON 29/08/2014 FROM PROVIDENT

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?
HONESTLY I CANT REMEMBER

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? NOT SURE

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?
NO nothing
 

Why did you cease payments?
DISAGREEMENT WITH THE AGENT

 

What was the date of your last payment?
UNSURE BUT I BELIEVE 2012

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?
NO

thanks Nibbles

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfick......now refer back to the link and get a CPR /CCA requests running

If you have not already set up your user name to use the online facility (MCOL) to deal with this claim..instructions are contained within the response pack.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

MCOL Money Claim Online...the Gov Portal for electronic court claims

CCA/CPR is on the link..." What you need to do now " after the above Q,s

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply Andy ,

i clicked on the links under what to do now .... takes me to "the page you request does not exist " 😯

as for the MCOL yeah i worked it out . ive registered and logged in but i have no idea how to use the password the court sent me as i had to register for an account .

 

Thanks Nibbles

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies we still have some gremlins to rectify on the new look forum

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy and no problem i thought it was me to be fair lol

ok i got on to MCOL now on there do i do  the Acknowledgment of Service and start my defence ? giving me time to right to the claiment ?

Thanks Nibbles
Link to post
Share on other sites

No...its all explained in the above link if you keep reading......you have 19 days from and including the date on the claim to acknowledge service and if defending you have a further 14 days to submit your defence.....so 33 days in total....no rush to do anything yet.

Keep your username and password safe.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send Provi an Sar

Ask for everything plus the agents accounts book

Sounds like as with all these doorstep loan Lowell claims statute barred...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey DX100UK ,

it was getting to me because i knew i hadnt had anything from provident in years .

to be honest im not sure if ive even had anything from lowell before now .

tho saying that i normally guess at envelopes that come through the door and tend not to open them ,

but as to this debt ive had no contact nor i have agreed to pay anthing to either company .

provident did actually send to a DCA - wescot they did actually send me a letter which i never responded to which today i have found . but i did find the last letter i had from provident .

ive uploaded it for you to see .

do i still need to SAR provident ?

thanks Nibbles

& here is the letter from Wescot im not sure if i had any before this but its the only one ive come across .

& ive been through all the boxes stored in the cupboard lol took me all day to :)

thanks Guys

Nibbles

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to LOWELL claim form - old provident doorstep loan

 

thread title updated for clarity

statute barred then as with all the others Lowell have tried to get CCJ's on.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok guys i wanted to add this before i finish print and send

CCA is to be sent to there solicitors and lowel them selfs and the CRP is to be sent to both also ??

 

and is this correct of what i need to send ?

[[REMOVED - dx}

 

thanks Nibbles

 

And this is the CRP correct ? that is sent to their solicitors ? just wanna get it right first time . if ive done anything wrong please let me know .

thanks again guys Nibbles .

 

[REMOVED -DX]

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does it say at the top of the template?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk my bad i shouldnt have posted it here .

yes i did and yes i now know which to send to which thanks again for helping .

 

( sorry i have to read and re read things serval times before it sinks in )

Nibbles .

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys , think i made a bulls up 😯

both CCA AND CRP gone off today . ive also did the acknowledgement followed through to the end ...so its ready for the next step.

but i think  as well as clicking "i intend to defend all of this claim" i think i also clicked "i intend to contest jurisdiciton " does that make a difference ??

 

thanks Nibbles .

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

shouldn't hurt you they are used to litigants in person making silly errors

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 I assume you have submitted a plea to defend in full ...you cant contest jurisdiction if you are defending the claim 😉

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey Andy

 

yes i clicked " i intend to denfend all of this claim "

but i did also click " i intend to contest jurisdiction "

oh well lol

 

..... so now i await the responses from lowell and there sols before entering my defence ect .

 

Nibbles .

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO YOU DO NOT WAIT!!

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey dx100uk ok noted ,

ok so my defence is, its statue barred.

as last payment was in dec 2012

and i had no contact with the original lender since then , and never had any contact with Lowells since they brought the account in 2014 .

do i just state the above as my defence ?

 

thanks Nibbles

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are 1000% sure its sb'd

 

then you can go file this now

no need to wait

 

The following defence is all you need if it is SB

 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

 2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 
.
If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.
..
..ends..
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...