Jump to content
Asma2019

Bluebadge confiscated!

Recommended Posts

Hello.

I have a question.

I have been sent an interview under caution regarding bluebadge misuse.

I parked in a disabled bay and my son was not with me at the time as he was ill

I went to collect medications for him as well I dropped my nephews who were attending local tuition classes so my sister could look after my unwell disabled son.

At the time the badge was not displayed however I was in the car parked in the disabled bay.

Parking officer approached me and asked me whether i had a bluebadge.

I said yes and he asked me if he could have a look at it.

I gave the badge with confidence.

He said who's badge is it and told him that it was for my son and I'm the named driver on this car.

He said that he will confiscate as I was misusing it.

I argued and thought I was right to say that how can my 7yr old son drive the car by himself?

The officer said that my son had to be with me at the time of use. 

Long story short.

I have recently moved home and my previous area that I lived, it was uncontrolled zone and all amenities including shops schools etc were nearby. So I'm not used to use the badge most of the time unless my son got hospital appointments. My driving was very limited. 


To be honest I was in shock this morning as I received a letter saying that I need to attend an interview under caution.

I feel like I committed a crime.

I have never gave the badge to anyone else and never knew I couldn't use it when my son is not with me. 


What advice would you give me?

Will I be sent to prison?

Will i be taken to court?

I'm in total shock as I have never encountered with any convictions before and now I feel like I'm the most wanted one.


Plz any advice.....I would appreciate.
TIA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've moved you thread to a more appropriate forum.

no you won't end up in prison.!!

it was for the benefit of your son.

you have a copy of the prescription, that should do.


PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

You need to to have a good read of the Blue Badge Scheme:

The Blue Badge scheme: rights and responsibilities in England

The Blue Badge scheme: rights and responsibilities in England

Question? was the vehicle used by any chance a Motability Vehicle


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a motability  vehicle & I'm the named driver. That day I made shopping and also got calpol for him over the counter as my son was unwell and gets hayfever very easily.

The issue with  me is that I didn't read the booklet that came with the badge since a relative opened when it arrived. As I was in a abusive relationship in which (thank God) I now have nonmolestation order in place.

I argued and thought I was right to say that how can my 7yr old son drive a car!
 After some research I noticed that the officer was right. I was honest but now know my ignorance and learned my lesson. If I was cheating I would have made story up but I was confident enough to argue thinking I was right😊and the car & badge were linked so that they could check, but now I know they are two completely different things.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

This is why I asked if it was a Motability Vehicle.

What you need to remember is that the Motability Scheme Rights & Responsibilities are completely separate from the Blue Badge Scheme Rights & Responsibilities.

Using the Car as you did you were correct for the Motability Scheme side but as the enforcement officer wasn't not on about the Motability Vehicle but the Blue Badge this is where it changed as the Blue Badge Rules are different.

Have a good read of the links I provided about the Blue Badge


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All no.


PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would avoid telling them that you didn't know.

Do you really think they would accept that you, a non disabled person, believed that you were entitled to park in a disabled spot just because you have a blue badge?

Considering that you know that the blue badge holder is your son, makes the all story very non believable. 

I suggest you go there, apologise profusely and hope they have mercy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Were you actually displaying/using the badge at the time you were asked for it or was not on display?

The way I read your post is that,  it was not on display, as such I would question the legality of the confiscation, because if you were not displaying and were parked in a disabled without displaying it then you have not misused it. If it was a council car park you would just have to pay the fine for parking in a disabled bay without displaying a blue badge.

The parking officer asked if you had a blue badge, not if you were using one, their is a difference and that  would be the defence I would use. "I had parked illegally and was asked if I had a blue badge and I said yes, officer asked to see to it and I showed it him, I wasn't actually using it at the time, nor had I displayed it when I parked up, as such I have not misused it, I just parked incorrectly. The officer did not ask me if I it was displayed just if I had one."

Edited by tomtom256

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • I was talked into signing up with Future Comms (future-comms.co.uk) who cold-called me to change my mobile contract to them, via 02, rather than EE. I have a small business (only me!) and it's a business contract. True, the 4G network is better for my area. This company seemed to be a marketing set-up for various telecoms companies, so I assumed anything I signed would be with 02 and didn't think it might be a problem.
       
      They sent an email whilst I was on the phone to set up the direct debit mandate with my bank which I signed electronically. That was the first, of many, problems I found. Apparently THAT was my contract, binding me to 3 years and no 'cooling off' period, because I was a 'business' (meaning any consumer rights did not apply). When I subsequently asked in writing for a copy of my contract, that is what they sent - when I argued it was a DD mandate they insisted it was my contract!
       
      2 days later they asked for my phone details to get it unlocked which I sent. 10 days later, EE closed my account, so I changed the SIM card to 02 that had come a few days before. No network! They had done nothing about unlocking it. Fortunately I was lucky with EE who managed to give me the right codes, rather than the usual 10 days to go through Samsung.
       
      By this time I was suspicious of their set-up and wanted to cancel. As I said earlier, I found myself trapped into a 3 year contract with no 14 day cooling off period (they don't offer that). Promises to deal with my complaints never happened, promised return calls neither....and on and on.
       
      Ofcom's rules apply to consumers and small businesses (under 10 employees), yet this shower don't acknowledge that. They just repeat and repeat that I am a business so it doesn't apply. To cancel the contract I have to pay the full 3 year's fees!!
       
      I would like to know if others have had similar experiences? Or does anyone know how I can maybe declare the 'contract' unenforceable? I have never before been locked into something without a clear written contract, with t&c's! And, yes, I have asked, and yes, I have been ignored.
      • 84 replies
    • Future comms!. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415706-future-comms/
      • 10 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
×
×
  • Create New...