Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TMAdvance loan settlement - are they right - Need help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1880 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I had a Loan with them and after 18 Months paying them 4,230.00 ( borrowing £3.000) to close my account still I had to pay £3,111.00.

They won’t tell you that they 'front load' the interest, meaning you pay all the interest only first

I borrowed 3k 18 months ago,

paid them 4.3k already and still owe them 3.1k?

Essentially this means they are taking the interest for the final 18 months when in reality I want to settle it before then,

plus they charge you interest for a period of time in the future that has not even happened yet!

I attached my signed contract and I can’t see anywhere that I will pay first interest only.

Is this right?

Can they do this not stating anywhere on the Contract?

Can someone read this please and let me know if I am wrong.

I want to complain asking for some refunds,

I paid my loan earlier (just recently) and still was to repay more than I took.

I asked as well for breakdown on the end asking how my instalments have been calculated and final Settlement and Statements but I did not received any details!!!

Only this, please see below:

“We did receive the payment and your account is now closed.

I have attached a copy of your Transaction History.

Below is an explanation of how our settlement figures are calculated.

I have also attached a copy of your signed loan agreement showing the terms of the loan.

We charge the full amount of your interest at the beginning of your loan agreement.

This means that we do not charge interest on a daily or monthly basis.

You owe the total amount payable on day 1 and you are obliged to make payments monthly in line with your agreement.

If, however, you decide to settle your loan early (in full or partially) we are obliged to give you a rebate of some of the interest under UK law.

The consumer Credit act gives a complicated calculation of the minimum rebate of interest we need to apply.

The formula to calculate the rebate can be found at the following link…

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1483/regulation/4/made

This rebate is deducted from your current balance to calculate the settlement figure.

The rebate changes daily and you receive less rebate the further you are into your loan term.

If you have any further questions please let me know. “

Can they do this?

It’s any point send Complains to FOS?

Thank you

 

 

scan_2019-03-02-13-26-30.pdf

scan_2019-03-02-13-21-44.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount owed for the full 48 months is £11,280, you are being charged £7,341 so you have not been charged the full amount of interest due over that period. As you only took the loan out 18 months ago, there were still 30 months left and not 18.

Paragraph 2.2 of the Terms and Conditions also states:

"Unless otherwise provided in this Loan Agreement, all payments will be applied to default charges, interest, then capital."

So any payments which you make offset default charges and interest first before capital. Although as mentioned, the consumer credit act means you cannot be charged the full amount of interest if you settle the loan earlier.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No this how loans work . I shall attempt to explain.

There will be a repayment sum calculated  to repay principle and interest over a defined period, and at a constant rate.

The interest on the loan is calculated monthly on the reducing balance, so initially this will take up the major part of the repayment and in some cases only pennies are left to off the principle.

This accounts for the interest to appear"front loaded "as you say.

However it is equitable.  It is at the beginning of the term they are lending the most money.

As the loan progresses the principle will reduce ,and therefore so will the interest which is calculated on it.

Leaving more to come off the loan balance.

This is why if you cancel nearer to the onset of the loan, the interest will be greater.

The settlement calculator available on line calculates the sum remaining using the algorithm(accrual) shown in the regs.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to TMAdvance loan settlement - are they right - Need help

I've sorted post 1 for you and updated the title too for clarity

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this to be quite accurate

 

http://www.financecalcs.co.uk/Calcs/Settlement.php

 

If you give me your interest rate or preferably the APR and the number of months the loan was over, I will calculate it for you

 

Ahh Just got your agreement to open.

Yes £3116.91 owed I am afraid.

 

149%APR Bloody hell

 

I wouldn't have thought this was not enforceable, I can have a look in the morning, if you like, or I am sure there are others on here.

 

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

as this is a version of a high int short term loan

I've moved the thread to the PDL forum.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...