Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lookinforinfo.   The text is updated:   1.       This case is often quoted by the claimant as assisting their case. However, in this instance it actually assists mine. It is contended that the act of stopping a vehicle does not amount to parking. This predatory operation pays no regard to the byelaws at all. It is likely that this Claimant may try to rely upon two 'trophy case' wins, namely VCS v Crutchley and/or VCS v Ward, neither of which were at an Airport location, which is not 'relevant land'. The Airport land is subject to the Airport Byelaws as specified in 'Section 63' of the Airports Act 1986 [EXHIBIT A]. Both cases involve flawed reasoning, and the Courts were wrongly steered by this Claimant's representative; there are worrying errors in law within those cases, such as an irrelevant reliance upon the completely different Supreme Court case. These are certainly not the persuasive decisions that this Claimant may suggest. Furthermore, VCS has been running the parking business at airports over the years it would be expected that they would become familiar with the Airports Act. Unfortunately, they choose to neglect and deny the Act in their Witness Statement.
    • Hi Mango,   Please don't post in large blocks of text as it's far harder to read. Spacing added for you in the post above.   Please give brief answers to UncleB's Q's above so we can better assess your case, thanks.
    • "These are certainly not the persuasive decisions that this Claimant may suggest." Well worded.   I would add that as VCS have been  active in Airports over the years  that one would  expect they would be familiar with the Airports Act which would call into question the accuracy of their WS.   By questioning their WS you are hoping that VCS might decide not to turn up in Court [giving you a walkover] as they might not want the Judge looking closely at their WS. Also it would not be good for them should you win your case based on the Airports Act as it will have other Courts  kicking out other Airport cases hitting them in the pocket.    
    • Hi,   Still no response. I have my Liability Order hearing in a few days time, I was hoping I might have been able to receive a response from either my local councillor or the leader of the council before then. I wonder if they are just going to ignore my email?   Walshy    
    • I have got an  independent expert report which clearly states it is a manufacturing fault, which DFS have been made aware of.   My point is that as a huge retailer of leather sofas with leather peeling  being a common complaint to me it seems evident they are aware it is a manufacturing fault on their side. Yet they play games with customers and worse of all try their level best to get the customer to believe that it is their fault due to oils or creams they are using.   Even if one is to believe that every day creams etc can cause this damage then in any event the sofas are not fit for purpose.   Surely they are merely playing a numbers game banking on the fact that most complainants will not follow through with legal action. Yet what about the anguish and distress they cause to customers in the process.   To me this shows alot of contempt towards consumers and is clearly unethical.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Barclays Business Account - £6000 removed ***Resolved***


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 720 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I am so stressed at the moment because Barclays have pulled a real good'un from their bag if crap.

An old customer accidentally sent us £6000 by bank transfer on Wednesday morning, rang us up to explain and asked if we could get it back to him.

Stupid us rang Barclays and told them what had happened and to return it back to the account it came from because it wasn't our money.

After an hour on the phone, a reversal was done on the payment.

Next morning, another £6000 gets removed out of the account. No warning, nothing. Several long calls to call centres abroad (around 4hrs worth) and it may be that the fraud department has pulled the funds and investigating. 

They've said it will take 10 days. We've got bills to pay and none of this is our fault. All we did was tell Barclays to put the original £6k back where it came from. 

Have we been caught up in some weird [problem] where the guy who transferred the funds gets his money back twice or are Barclays incompetent.

We raised the issue, we are getting penalised. No wonder people keep their mouths shut when unexpected money lands in their account!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I would be questioning why your old customer made the payment by mistake...6K by mistake ?

Have you checked with this customer he has got it back ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea, I did suggest to my husband that he rings him but I think he'd end up letting rip at the guy.

Even the woman at Barclays call centre on Wed thought how did they do that without checking it.

The whole thing stinks and Barclays have made it worse by pulling this stunt with no info.

Husbands gone into the local branch but they're too busy and he needs an appointment ffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shocking service and this Banks name comes up regularly here with regards to the same treatment to customers.....take a read of the other threads.

Have you tweeted this? CAG is having a few  problems with our Tweet account so we cant tweet it at the moment.

Escalate to the CEO dont bother with local branches.

Please update your thread with any developments...hope they refund you soon

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the links 👍

Other half ended up going to our “local” branch (6 miles away) and it turns out that not only have Barclays put a hold on the £6000, they have frozen the account 😡 

We are an innocent party who almost got screwed for £6k, and we are getting treated by criminals by Barclays. 15 days to investigate fraud with the account - you couldn’t make this up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Euro,

This may be bad news as a "frozen" a/c can often mean there's an Anti Money Laundering check going on.

This means you may be told nothing and the bank could take as long as they need to carry out the (behind the scenes) regulatory checks.

Proceed with the complaint to Head Office in any event as this may be your best chance, because it sounds to me like this should never have been anything other than a "payment error" reversal.

Keep us posted. :-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

Sorry to read of your troubles.

We had a problem with Barclays over the Christmas period in our business account and it is a sorry tale and not good news for you.

We frequently deposit cash sums into our account and have done since we opened it about 4 years ago.

In the week before Christmas we did so and Barclays froze our account and all the others by applying a £500K "overdraft" on all of the accounts so that we could not take money out.

I spent a fruitless day in branch and on the phone to no avail.  I was in real trouble as we needed to pay our staff for Christmas and had no money with which to do it.  Barclays staff had no idea, or at least if they did they were not telling us.

We went to court and tried to get an injunction to get our money back or for them to give a reason why our account was frozen.  The court expedited the hearing but Barclays did not turn up due to service issues so the court postponed the case.

10 working days after the freeze the account was restored but a few days later we were given 60 days notice and have now moved to Metrobank.  They offered no explanation except for push button letters and did not even refund the charges they made for bouncing direct debits even though we had frozen funds.

Here is what I think happened and what I think is happening to you.

Day one: They suspected or feared that the deposit was due to money laundering.   If they have a suspicion (or one of their staff has a suspicion of)  money laundering then if they do not report it to the National Crime Agency they can be prosecuted for assisting in money laundering.  Therefore, having themselves come to a suspicion they reported the transaction and froze the account.  By doing so the law allows them to claim immunity against prosecution for assisting money laundering. In other words, they covered their asses!

From this point on, they did not give any meaningful information because if they were to advise us that they suspected us of money laundering and had notified the National Crime Agency then they would be at risk of prosecution for tipping us off! by not speaking to us they once again covered their asses!

The NCA will review the report and if they have not communicated to Barclays that they are interested in the report after 10 working days then Barclays will assume that all is well and restore the account and this is what happened to us at Day 10, as far as I can tell, almost to the hour.

This is what will likely happen to you.  If you look at the date/time of your bank freeze and add ten WORKING days that is the day you will get your account back and until that time you will get nothing from Barclays no explanation before, during or after the event.

Total Madness.

Likely they will follow up with notice to close your account. why? to cover their asses!!

Notice in my explanation that everything was about covering their asses and your ass does not matter!

My advice to you is not to wait but to open another account.  I can strongly recommend Starling Bank for both personal and business accounts.   (We went Metro because both directors in our business need access and Starling currently only allows one person to access an account as they are mobile phone based, but brilliant with Mastercard for payments and full deposit facilities at any Post Office).

Get rid of Barclays.  Notwithstanding they think you may be a risk to them they are a definite risk to you and all other Barclays Account holders and have demonstrated it already.

    

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, comebackjimmy said:

Hello

Sorry to read of your troubles.

We had a problem with Barclays over the Christmas period in our business account and it is a sorry tale and not good news for you.

We frequently deposit cash sums into our account and have done since we opened it about 4 years ago.

In the week before Christmas we did so and Barclays froze our account and all the others by applying a £500K "overdraft" on all of the accounts so that we could not take money out.

I spent a fruitless day in branch and on the phone to no avail.  I was in real trouble as we needed to pay our staff for Christmas and had no money with which to do it.  Barclays staff had no idea, or at least if they did they were not telling us.

We went to court and tried to get an injunction to get our money back or for them to give a reason why our account was frozen.  The court expedited the hearing but Barclays did not turn up due to service issues so the court postponed the case.

10 working days after the freeze the account was restored but a few days later we were given 60 days notice and have now moved to Metrobank.  They offered no explanation except for push button letters and did not even refund the charges they made for bouncing direct debits even though we had frozen funds.

Here is what I think happened and what I think is happening to you.

Day one: They suspected or feared that the deposit was due to money laundering.   If they have a suspicion (or one of their staff has a suspicion of)  money laundering then if they do not report it to the National Crime Agency they can be prosecuted for assisting in money laundering.  Therefore, having themselves come to a suspicion they reported the transaction and froze the account.  By doing so the law allows them to claim immunity against prosecution for assisting money laundering. In other words, they covered their asses!

From this point on, they did not give any meaningful information because if they were to advise us that they suspected us of money laundering and had notified the National Crime Agency then they would be at risk of prosecution for tipping us off! by not speaking to us they once again covered their asses!

The NCA will review the report and if they have not communicated to Barclays that they are interested in the report after 10 working days then Barclays will assume that all is well and restore the account and this is what happened to us at Day 10, as far as I can tell, almost to the hour.

This is what will likely happen to you.  If you look at the date/time of your bank freeze and add ten WORKING days that is the day you will get your account back and until that time you will get nothing from Barclays no explanation before, during or after the event.

Total Madness.

Likely they will follow up with notice to close your account. why? to cover their asses!!

Notice in my explanation that everything was about covering their asses and your ass does not matter!

My advice to you is not to wait but to open another account.  I can strongly recommend Starling Bank for both personal and business accounts.   (We went Metro because both directors in our business need access and Starling currently only allows one person to access an account as they are mobile phone based, but brilliant with Mastercard for payments and full deposit facilities at any Post Office).

Get rid of Barclays.  Notwithstanding they think you may be a risk to them they are a definite risk to you and all other Barclays Account holders and have demonstrated it already.

    

Your account was closed because you took legal action against Barclays. 

They view it as a breakdown of relationship between the customer and the bank themselves. Part of the T&Cs outside of the ML Regs for this account will include that they can close your account if there is a breakdown of relationship between yourselves. 

Anyway if you wish to tell us more - Please create a new thread - We are still waiting to hear back from the OP.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fkofilee

Thanks for the comment.  Had no thought of our legal action giving rise to the notice but it does of course make sense.

I am not trying to hijack this post with my own story by the way but wanted to offer my experience to the OP and I am not seeking any advice about this on CAG, but if you think it worthwhile then maybe I should create my own thread.

I think my experience does reveal a pattern that is that the account is likely to be restored after the 10 working days, and I think it is none the less a good idea to get another bank account going.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wanting to add to the hijack of Europa's thread but ........

........ just to add another angle on this, we've seen many Barclays bank a/c's closed over many years by the bank after an Anti ML enquiry/freeze where no court action was taken against the bank.

No explanation, no suggestion of any wrongdoing, no funds confiscated but the a/c was closed anyway.

I took my own bank to court years back and they left my a/c open despite refunding £2.8K in fees.

However, I fully agree that Europa should take pre-emptive action and seek alternative banking facilities in case Barclays close a/c's. 

😎

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Comebackjimmy, Wow! Thank you for sharing this, it’s scary how they can screw over your business with one move with no comeback (although not in the least surprising 😯).

 

Earlier this week, the money was returned to the account and we could access the account finally. Certainly a lot quicker than we expected but still no communication until this afternoon. 

 

Someone from the complaints department rang my husband and asked him to go through the issue again (?!), didn’t comment on how their call centre adviser almost lost us £6000, but did finally take the details of the account it was to be transferred to, and the [EDIT]’s phone number (obviously a Lyca mobile burner).

There was no mention of why it happened, only “it’s for your protection”. Ha!!

 

They also gave us a £100 apology payment which I suppose covers the hours and phone minutes lost fixing this.

 

My husband is now looking for another business account but doesn’t want to end up with a bank that will screw us over just as much, and have zero customer service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad this has been resolved for you europa16

Thread title updated to reflect the outcome.

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to Barclays Business Account - £6000 removed ***Resolved***
  • Andyorch unfeatured this topic

We moved to Metrobank.  good choice except for the lack of branches unless you are in London.  If you need cash deposits you can do it via Post Offices using your Metrobank card and account.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...