Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can anyone advise?

If a County court summons has been issued, and the date set for a hearing.

Can the case still become statute barred if the time limit i.e. 6 years occurs during the above procedure.

Or does the court action negate the statute?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Negates....once that claim form is issued the Limitation clock stops...unless it was already Statute Barred before issuance.

If the claim is discontinued it re starts 

 

Thread moved to General Legal Issues Forum..please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

    Donate button something to the Consumer Action Group   

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

issuance of claimform pauses the clock.

if they win its reset, if they lose and the claim is discontinued or dismissed ir resumes from when it paused


PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

Can anyone tell me the difference between Deed of assignment and notice of assignment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the search

 

Deed is the private doc that details the business 2 business sale of a debt.

 

NOA IS what you get telling you sale has happen

Tell us what's going on..no need for secret squirrel 


PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA started court proceedings on 2 issues, both roughly the same amount.

I asked for the necessary documents, etc. The first case was struck out because the DCA didn't pay the fee, the DCA also wrote and informed me that the debt was discontinued.

The second, with the same DCA, has continued, I presume they paid the fee. Small claims hearing in April.

The claim will be statute barred in a few days, but I notice the statute barred clock stops only if the party who legally owned the debt starts the court procedings, not necessarily the DCA.

I wondered if Deed was the same as notice of assignment and if the DCA have the legal right to the debt. i.e. are they the legal owners?

Hope this makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure where you are reading but its WRONG

stick with CAG.

 

 


PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

not sure where you are reading but its WRONG

stick with CAG.

 

 

Dont understand what you mean, could you clarify?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, moelwyn said:

The claim will be statute barred in a few days, but I notice the statute barred clock stops only if the party who legally owned the debt starts the court procedings, not necessarily the DCA.

garbage!!


PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply dx

Should I have a default notice and a notice of assignment from the original creditor?

The DCA has not supplied a copy of a default notice. They claim not to have one.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

both can be fatal to their claim

get that link done please


PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

I am just a bit wary of filing information on the internet just yet.

Would you help me out with a few answers first.

How do i know the debt has been legally assigned to the DCA without some sort of confirmation?

The DCA has given me a letter from themselves claiming ownership of the debt, but nothing from an original creditor to confirm.

They have also supplied statements which they allege are from the original creditor but there are no details of who the creditor is on these statements, just photocopied papers with figures on them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

stop playing secret squirrel

there are 1000's of claims here already.

not ONCE has this been ever to anything but the determent to a claim we have helped with.

 


PLEASE DONT USE REPLY WITH QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know what secret squirrel means.

I would prefer not to put the details on the WEB.

According to the DCAs all the template letters are "garbage"and yet using the "letters" I have stopped 2 CC actions and deterred 2 other DCAs.

This last case seems to be different and I am trying to determine why.

Could anyone answer the question I have asked above without preconditions?

Thanks to all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In order for a new company to be able to sue, a debt must be "absolutely assigned" to the new company. The procedure is contained in the Law of Property Act 1925.

In order for the assignment to be "absolute" a notice must be sent under section 136 to the debtor, if a notice is not sent the assignment can only be in equity, and the new company can only take action in partnership with the original creditor. A notice can be sent to the debtor by either party.

  • Like 1

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your reply.

Does this mean that there would be a letter of assignment from the original creditor, and that the DCA would have to produce this letter?

I quote section 136 "Any absolute assignment under the hand of the assignor....of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor..." - this appears to say that it must be the assignor who informs the debtor in writing - do I understand this correctly?

Many thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, "under the hand of the assignor" does not mean sent by etc. just that the OC must have authorised the assignment.

As said either party can send the notice.

There is also requirement for notification to be sent under the CCA.


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What documents in total do there have to be? 

There is no default notice, in fact they state that & have sent a computer screen printout saying this is what it would have looked like.

They have sent a bundle of statements purporting to be from the original creditor, but there is no indication of who they are from - no business name or address. 

There is a letter of assignment from the DCA.

There is a partly legible copy of a credit agreement that has the wrong phone number & occupation.

What else can we legally ask for? And what of the above documents counts in their favour?

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, dx100uk said:

Difficult to advise or quantify your questions without the history of the debt and details of claim ...please complete the above link


We could do with some help from you.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

    Donate button something to the Consumer Action Group   

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should follow DX and Andy here, the site has a tried and tested procedure for court procedures .

There is a discussion section where we can go into the questions individually.

 

 


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • I was talked into signing up with Future Comms (future-comms.co.uk) who cold-called me to change my mobile contract to them, via 02, rather than EE. I have a small business (only me!) and it's a business contract. True, the 4G network is better for my area. This company seemed to be a marketing set-up for various telecoms companies, so I assumed anything I signed would be with 02 and didn't think it might be a problem.
       
      They sent an email whilst I was on the phone to set up the direct debit mandate with my bank which I signed electronically. That was the first, of many, problems I found. Apparently THAT was my contract, binding me to 3 years and no 'cooling off' period, because I was a 'business' (meaning any consumer rights did not apply). When I subsequently asked in writing for a copy of my contract, that is what they sent - when I argued it was a DD mandate they insisted it was my contract!
       
      2 days later they asked for my phone details to get it unlocked which I sent. 10 days later, EE closed my account, so I changed the SIM card to 02 that had come a few days before. No network! They had done nothing about unlocking it. Fortunately I was lucky with EE who managed to give me the right codes, rather than the usual 10 days to go through Samsung.
       
      By this time I was suspicious of their set-up and wanted to cancel. As I said earlier, I found myself trapped into a 3 year contract with no 14 day cooling off period (they don't offer that). Promises to deal with my complaints never happened, promised return calls neither....and on and on.
       
      Ofcom's rules apply to consumers and small businesses (under 10 employees), yet this shower don't acknowledge that. They just repeat and repeat that I am a business so it doesn't apply. To cancel the contract I have to pay the full 3 year's fees!!
       
      I would like to know if others have had similar experiences? Or does anyone know how I can maybe declare the 'contract' unenforceable? I have never before been locked into something without a clear written contract, with t&c's! And, yes, I have asked, and yes, I have been ignored.
      • 84 replies
    • Future comms!. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415706-future-comms/
      • 10 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
×
×
  • Create New...