Jump to content



moelwyn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Negates....once that claim form is issued the Limitation clock stops...unless it was already Statute Barred before issuance.

If the claim is discontinued it re starts 

 

Thread moved to General Legal Issues Forum..please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

issuance of claimform pauses the clock.

if they win its reset, if they lose and the claim is discontinued or dismissed ir resumes from when it paused

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the search

 

Deed is the private doc that details the business 2 business sale of a debt.

 

NOA IS what you get telling you sale has happen

Tell us what's going on..no need for secret squirrel 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA started court proceedings on 2 issues, both roughly the same amount.

I asked for the necessary documents, etc. The first case was struck out because the DCA didn't pay the fee, the DCA also wrote and informed me that the debt was discontinued.

The second, with the same DCA, has continued, I presume they paid the fee. Small claims hearing in April.

The claim will be statute barred in a few days, but I notice the statute barred clock stops only if the party who legally owned the debt starts the court procedings, not necessarily the DCA.

I wondered if Deed was the same as notice of assignment and if the DCA have the legal right to the debt. i.e. are they the legal owners?

Hope this makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure where you are reading but its WRONG

stick with CAG.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, moelwyn said:

The claim will be statute barred in a few days, but I notice the statute barred clock stops only if the party who legally owned the debt starts the court procedings, not necessarily the DCA.

garbage!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply dx

Should I have a default notice and a notice of assignment from the original creditor?

The DCA has not supplied a copy of a default notice. They claim not to have one.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

both can be fatal to their claim

get that link done please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

I am just a bit wary of filing information on the internet just yet.

Would you help me out with a few answers first.

How do i know the debt has been legally assigned to the DCA without some sort of confirmation?

The DCA has given me a letter from themselves claiming ownership of the debt, but nothing from an original creditor to confirm.

They have also supplied statements which they allege are from the original creditor but there are no details of who the creditor is on these statements, just photocopied papers with figures on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop playing secret squirrel

there are 1000's of claims here already.

not ONCE has this been ever to anything but the determent to a claim we have helped with.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know what secret squirrel means.

I would prefer not to put the details on the WEB.

According to the DCAs all the template letters are "garbage"and yet using the "letters" I have stopped 2 CC actions and deterred 2 other DCAs.

This last case seems to be different and I am trying to determine why.

Could anyone answer the question I have asked above without preconditions?

Thanks to all

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order for a new company to be able to sue, a debt must be "absolutely assigned" to the new company. The procedure is contained in the Law of Property Act 1925.

In order for the assignment to be "absolute" a notice must be sent under section 136 to the debtor, if a notice is not sent the assignment can only be in equity, and the new company can only take action in partnership with the original creditor. A notice can be sent to the debtor by either party.

  • Like 1

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your reply.

Does this mean that there would be a letter of assignment from the original creditor, and that the DCA would have to produce this letter?

I quote section 136 "Any absolute assignment under the hand of the assignor....of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor..." - this appears to say that it must be the assignor who informs the debtor in writing - do I understand this correctly?

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, "under the hand of the assignor" does not mean sent by etc. just that the OC must have authorised the assignment.

As said either party can send the notice.

There is also requirement for notification to be sent under the CCA.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

What documents in total do there have to be? 

There is no default notice, in fact they state that & have sent a computer screen printout saying this is what it would have looked like.

They have sent a bundle of statements purporting to be from the original creditor, but there is no indication of who they are from - no business name or address. 

There is a letter of assignment from the DCA.

There is a partly legible copy of a credit agreement that has the wrong phone number & occupation.

What else can we legally ask for? And what of the above documents counts in their favour?

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, dx100uk said:

Difficult to advise or quantify your questions without the history of the debt and details of claim ...please complete the above link

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should follow DX and Andy here, the site has a tried and tested procedure for court procedures .

There is a discussion section where we can go into the questions individually.

 

 

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...