Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thats not the way to do it sorry. sorry so what is your problem? that vanquis paid the £560 or that they are now chasing it? how old is this debt? dx  
    • If you visited Qatar you could be detained at the border, if the debt has been notified.  If you are only in transit and do not seek to cross border into Qatar you might be ok, but you may want to seek formal advice about this.
    • Howdy, I had a short lived credit card with Vanquis that I did not need. I paid it off in full and called them and closed it with the person at the other end. 2 months later they started sending me messages about late payments, I called them and to find out that the card had not been closed in error and 6 weeks after it should have been closed they paid a google debit of £560. I hit the roof and made a formal complaint that took them well over a month to respond to. They agreed they were at fault, refunded all late payments fees and offered me £100 in compensation. However they said the debit amount stood as 'I had benefit from it' and I should get a refund from google. I hit the roof again but they have stuck to their guns. The debit from google is a genuine one but I wanted to dispute it with google so closed the card so they would have to engage with me. But surely that's neither here nor there surely? What is the next step? Ombudsman takes forever doesn't it?  thanks in advance
    • Yes, it struck me this morning that I'd got it wrong    - no involvement of UKPPO in any previous Tesco thread    - there would have been an entrance sign to a Tesco car park    - CCTV isn't something associated with Tesco car parks. Presumably whoever runs the car park has put CCTV at the electric, and probably BB, areas, done absolutely nothing to stop abuse, and then rubs their hands in glee every time the CCTV catches a motorist out. You can pay £60 and this will go away. Or you can defy UKPPO and rely on their non-respect of POFA, consideration period, etc., should they be daft enough to do court later down the line.  We would support you all the way.
    • Good evening folks, i have my hearing tomorrow at 3pm. I have never been to court for a civil matter, what is likely to happen  and what do i need to do?  I plan on going straight from work, i finish at 2pm, it will take about half an hour to get there, does that sound ok? I called the court late this afternoon, sadly i was too late in the day and the office was closed.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link Financial chasing deceased parent MBNA debt at my address


lolo1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1822 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can someone help.

I have Link Financial writing to me about my deceased father owing them money.

They have been sent death certs already but have now addressed a statement to him at 'my house.'

The letter talks to him

- saying 'behind on payments.

They are lunatics.

They have had (and acknowledged x2 death certs).

I have written to them saying I believe that debt is statute barred and that my father has died.

They waited months with no communication and now this.

Shall I just return to sender?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When my Father died last year, I found one letter from Link Financial saying she owed x amount.

I contacted them and said that she had died and that she had no monies.

 

There was seemingly lots of debt and there was no executor as no will and too much debt for anyone to take it on.

They asked for the death cert.

 

Tons of calls later, and speaking to many people over weeks, transpires this cowboy company lost one cert.

I paid for another and sent it and then they sent both back.

 

They asked for a list of all the creditors.

I sought advice and they said that Link wanted that list so they could join ranks etc and not obliged to give a list of anything.

 

Further research I found out that this particular debt was from 2006 and Link bought it in 2014.

That was over 6 years between.

 

I asked for proof it was owed (by letter 3 times) and no answer.

 

I wrote to ombudsman about their lack of communication and haven't had response yet from FOS

- apart from to say ombudsman will reply.

 

I wrote to link again to say 'it's statute barred' and don't expect to hear from you.

 

They wrote to the solicitor looking after my grandmother's affairs (she too passed away) who I had told them 'may' be holding a small amount of monies but they are not my Father's solicitor.

 

It was like they were hedging their bets hoping that someone would just pay this unproven debt.

the solicitor replied with 'not acting on their behalf and don't know of the executor.

This week after 2 months of nothing-

 

I have received a letter 'addressed to my Father' (who they know is deceased) at MY address, saying she owes this amount and please get in touch as debt shouldn't be ignored etc.

 

How can she reply if she's not alive?

 

It's as if they have just sent out a generic letter again.

 

What should I do?

 

There 'might' be a small amount of cash to pay however if it is statute barred then I don't think it needs to be paid.

Scotland is 5 years s barred where she lived.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You shouldn't have contacted them, and have wasted too much time on these fleecers already. wait until the team come on and advise further

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you have 2 letters one to your Mum and Dad ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you.

 

I need advice on the statute barred element.

 

I 'think' they bought a statute barred debt and have listed purchase date as 2014.

 

However, surely the statute barred part is before that if my Father didn't acknowledge it nor pay it.

 

They never answer that question and now mail him directly at my house- corrupt and wrong.

 

My Father has never lived here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay with you I have made a few edits so this thread flows regarding your Fathers death.

 

With regards to link ignore and forget them....they cant write to your address for another person debt and they cant chase a deceased persons debt unless officially through the executor/administrator.

 

You have informed them and supplied the necessary documentation.

 

The debt is statute barred

 

Any further letters write across the front return to sender not known at this address.

 

I know its difficult and very insensitive but keep your cool and deal with this calmly and methodically.The debt died with your fathers passing...nothing they can do or get.

 

Andy

 

Thread title updated

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the debt was taken out whilst he was resident in Scotland its extinguished. Dead gone parrot ..doesn't exist.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its the Executors responsibility to inform and then provide a copy should it be requested.Telling them to apply and pay for their own copy wouldn't help and most probably antagonise the situation

 

Andy

 

CAGlink31.gif will be CLOSED due to a major upgradelink3.gif from 14:30PM Tuesday 26th 2019 for at least 48hrs and will be available in Read Only status during this process

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Io;o1 has done more than was required, so any more hassling from Stink Financial should be ignored.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realise that it's the job of the Executors responibility to provide details of the death, it there is an executor and thus a will, but surely death certificates are a public record and a debt collector could obtain one if they needed to satisfy themselves that the person is indeed deceseased.

A next of kin, maybe when they're possibly greaving would, in my opinion, have discharged their duty by informing a debt collector of the death and maybe gone the extra mile by providing a copy of their certificate.

I was asked or an original or certified copy of death certificate of my father, that was when a lawyer advised me to tell them to obtain it themselves, which I assume they did, their approach to me was certainly antagonistic and verging on the bullying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I appreciate your points.....but when you are going through this process its probably best to comply and simplify the process rather than you antagonise the process...that is if you feel the need to actually inform a DCA..my points are very much concerning an Original Creditor....on a live account.

 

I suppose it depends on whether the deceased was actually cooperating with a DCA and actually making payments...if not as I have stated ignore and as for posting letters to family address of the deceased then that should be reported the relevant regulated authorities.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

He had no agreement in place and paid nothing 'if it was even his debt' who knows!

If there is some money in the estate

- however small,

I am refusing to give it as  I said,

I believe they bought a statute barred debt.

The only thing I care about is whether they can sue me if I ignore them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant sue you its not your debt...its a pity you informed them of his death though...now they have your address and assume you are the executor.Still no monies no estate no payment and anyway statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

your real problem is you responded to them in the first place.....

they think you are a mug and one more threat will make you cave in.

A DCA  couldn't careless he is dead

a DCA couldn't careless its not your debt

a DCA couldn't careless the debt is statute barred

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've already complained to the Ombudsman

 

that when asked direct questions:

Is the debt statute barred when you purchased it?

They didn't answer but replied with something else they wanted.

This meant that they had deliberately not answered that question because they are snakes.

 

I also asked if they would be taking on the executor role and said that the debt wasn't even proven.

 

Ignored all points and instead waited months and wrote to my deceased father again.

 

Mental! Waiting to hear from ombudsman. re the first points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst the incestuous world of DBSG'continue to rub each others ego's, (amongst other things!) let your local MP know about how corrupt and rotten to the core these clowns really are.

Also lodge complaints with the FCA, and hammer the Ombudsman when they ignore your complaint too.

  • Like 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you the executor of the estate? If so carry on doing your job ad distribute the estate as per the terms of the will, there is no need to consider their demands becasue they have failed to follow the procedures (and that ignores their lack of any substance). Do not communicate with them as that only encourages them to continue to try it on.

i would also be tempted to report this to the consumer advice section of papers like the "Times" and the "Mail on Sunday" as it is jam on their bread and butter. However, you must let your complaint to the Ombudsman run its course first

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you- there was no will, he died intestate.

No wife, just two children, myself and my brother.

Link have been by far the worst people to deal with in ALL ways.

They didn't even once offer condolences.

At least the other creditors always said 'sorry first.' 

They lost one death certificate and denied receiving it.

I bought another and they initially said that was lost.

THEN months later sent both back.

They then demanded a list of all creditors and one of the creditors said 'no, you do not have to tell them about us.'

They are outrageous.

Will ignore them.

They are not getting a penny!

Fingers crossed.

If they ever write it off, they probably won't tell me as they don't want you to know they can't chase you.

It's part of their control.

VERY immoral.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its statute barred under Scottish law the debt does not even exist

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, lolo1 said:

If they ever write it off, they probably won't tell me as they don't want you to know they can't chase you.

They will probably sell the debt on to Phillips & Cohen who specialise in "deceased account management". P&C have a pretty grubby reputation when it comes to collecting on these types of debts.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the debt please...

original creditor

type of debt

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...