It would but you'd have to do so much redacting as no way should you even show those to a claimant. Gives away far too much other data.
for want of clarification..it's for the claimant to prove a debt is not statute barred..not for a defendant to prove its not.
i have had one scottish claim like this.
i refused to let the fleecers in court see the statements and told the sheriff i was more than happy for him to view them privately.
he agreed and got may complete folder of every statement from 1982 till that date (2015) some 600 pages.
after a short recess!!..he ask me one further question..did i have any other ways of funding that i might of used..i said yes..he said what types..i said 2 other banks accounts of which both were joint and that i was not comfortable with disclosing the other party 's personal spending ..but had them and would disclose the statements if requested.
He asked was the paperwork as comprehensive as the one currently with him..i said yes..he said that will not be required you are under oath i take your word with a smile..
you should be blocking and bouncing all emails regarding any supposed debts
same as you should never discuss debt at your door nor over the phone to any DCA.
a dca is not a bailiff
zero legal powers on any debt.
in this case as you've been reading like threads
you should already be aware CRS are harlands in a different frock
look at the addresses.