Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital one Credit Card PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1549 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

they have 8 weeks 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about it ..youve complained its registered you met the deadline

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that deadline is nothing to do with the FOS where'd you read that??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

sorry must of missed your 28th post ..

bundle it all up, p'haps on a cheap penstick

attach that to a copy of your fos cq and sent it off.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update= Since our last letter dated 30 July, Followed by a call on the 28 Aug chasing updates from them. We heard nothing until today. Their letter states the following:

 

"We have been unable to complete our investigations within the original  time frames stated on the acknowledgment dated 31 July due to us not having received the requested information to enable us to respond to the complaint"

 

 

And later they say since its been over 8 weeks, we can now refer to FOS but its advisable for them to complete the investigation first but we need to submit the requested info before they can do so!

 

Never received any other letter from them and not sure what information they need. They also acknowledged receiving the letter dated 31 July on the phone but no direct response in writing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

regardless to any comms

you are entitled .....should you wish

to goto the FOS once 8 weeks have expired.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already have appealed through FOS

I wonder what other info they require ?

 

One more thing to add.

is it possible to ask for the phone conversations made to Capital Once since the complaint started ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update:

They have sent 3 letters.

1: They have made their final decision and we have to complain to the FOS

2. Requesting more info in order to investigate the case further.

3. Saying their last letter was a mistake and they have concluded their investigation and stick to their final decision back in February and will not be paying out for any PPI premiums.

 

All correspondence now going the FOS for them to investigate. 

 

 

 

Edited by joox
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update 

FOS have responded with the following:

since it has been more than 6 months since our original complaint to Capital One, they are unable to help.

We were not aware there was a time limit. also Capital took a long time trying to respond to our complaint and still have not provided clear answers.

 

What are the options now?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

write back..

following the original PPI complaint to cap1 (see letter dated xxx ref xxx) on date xxxx, cap1 replied on date xxx (see letter dated xxx ref xxx) stating they refused my reclaim because of XXX (reasons) and without any further new information the complaint would be closed. I did not consider thye matter closed.

 

ON xxx date (see letter dated xxx ref xxx) I replied with further information from an SAR return querying certain matters, cap1 failed to reply, then following a chase phonecall on (date) they eventually replied stating they standby their earlier refusal.

 

it is not my fault Cap1 failed to reply within a reasonable time, perhaps purposefully knowing this now conveniently put the original claim date outside of your 6mts time limit.

 

I do not consider the 6mts limit for you to begin an investigation has thus expired.

 

please investigate my complaint as per your PPI mis-selling guidelines, particularly concentrating upon how (see letter dated xxx ref xxx) cap1 appear to be relying upon false data in their original rejection letter that i pointed out to them was faulty, but they then ignored me??

 

how can Cap1 sign me up to PPI when the credit card (application) the PPI was to protect had not even approved on that PPI sign up date??

the relevant data proving this is their own SAR return! 

 

the card application was not even approved at that point and was not approved until several weeks later.!!

 

…………...

 

do you still have a copy of all the info you sent to the FOS please?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...