Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital one Credit Card PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

pm advice is not allowed

helps no-one bar you

which is not what cag is about.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is the letter i will use:

 

 

You refused my ppi reclaim because you mentioned that I agreed and purchased the PPI  on a phone conversation with Capital One on 13th October 2003. It seems the PPI was already activated with the little sticker on the back without my knowledge

 

I have gone through the SAR but unable to locate any of this information as you claim. Please kindly outline where is the data that confirms I did agreed to this? I am looking to locate records of when the card was activated and when was the PPI activated

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

October?

 

you refused my ppi reclaim because you said I agreed to it when I phone YOU on 13th nov 2003 to activate the card. 

when in all truth the card was already activated but the little sticker was to get conned into PPI.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ill knock something up later

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps knew there was something i missed....

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey wouldn't matter if you did

most certainly would never stop me helping anyone

I want to carefully go through that org reply ...play them at their own game.

sri heads not upto it right now.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the PDF of the org rejection letter you've masked the date they quote

what is that please?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, dx100uk said:

on the PDF of the org rejection letter you've masked the date they quote

what is that please?

 

 

The PPI was sold over the phone on the 13 October 2003 ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I already asked that but wanted to be sure .

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looking at the comms log sheet.

 

it reads to me that PPI must have been activated before the card was even approved!!

 

13/10/2003 [the supposed date of the phone call]

Decision is REFER

20/10/2003 application pending.

 

2003/11/11 decision is accept.

 

sorry but how can someone sign you up to PPI when the credit card the PPI will protect is not even approved

 

they have LIED that the phonecall 13/10/2003 was to activate the card, it WASNT, the card application was not accepted until 1 month later 11/11/2003

 

which tallies with no PPI charges till

17/12/2003    PPI                        £0.85   
the 1st bill after activation

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as that makes sense

twill be a reply to their last letter

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tardis time..

in post one you say:

 

The original card application was completed on the phone

 

by 'completed' do you mean she originally applied for the card by [please state the method]

she got the card it had the below sticker on it. so she rang the number [show her the sticker]

 

The method of how she applied for the card is my interest here.

 

were there two phone calls??

one when she asked for the card

one where she got the card in the post but had to phone to activate it [white sticker]

 

the above info will further my thoughts on an in for the kill letter 

or a dangler letter to see if they want to trip themselves up.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

white activation sticker.pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The card application date is unknown and have to double check as the earliest date on the SAR is 13/10/2003

She does not remember how the initial application was filled out  or made. Should this be on the SAR?

 

From their letter, The PPI was sold over the phone on the  13/10/2003   " when we were contacted to activate the card "  so the application date is not clear here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just called Capital One and she was told the account was opened on the 24/11/2003 that's the date on their system.

 

Also, initially thought the application was made online back in 2003 :) not sure we had access to online applications back then but it seems it was done over the phone.

Not very clear on details from their side. 

 

On the logs, it states it was accepted on the 11/11/2003 and the application starting date is the 13/10/2003.

 

The customer service person said there seems to a discrepancy with the dates regarding PPI and has provided an address to write to find out why the dates differ !!! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ye see scratch the surface …..

 

was the call recorded par chance?

 

to get a card in the post with that white sticker on means it was already applied for and the application was accepted.

so whats the truth here.

 

they cant activate/charge PPI if there was no active card , hence the 1st dec bill

so PPI was mis-sold IMHO and you should be getting the premiums back NOT a plevin refund.

 

whats this address?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sure the call was recorded !

She was give the Capital One Relation Complaints 

PPI Capital One

Nottingham

NG2 3HX 

May be they got the activation date wrong 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant recorded by you not them....

 

dear sir/madam.

 

I write to you concerning a PPI reclaiming matter and have been advised today by your phone   .

 

This comes under two ref numbers

ref xxx dated xxxx, a refused claim referring to an earlier final response with ref to below, resulting in an offer of a plevin refund.

ref xxx dated xxx, mt initial claim which was refused.

 

Following a Subject Access Request it has come to my attention that the original refusal was based upon information that Capital One does not hold and was thus made in error.

 

Having applied for a credit card, i successfully received one in the post slightly prior to 13/10/2003 with the relevant documentation.

Upon the card was a white sticker that gave a number to ring to activate. On 13/10/2003 I rang the number to do so.

It apparently appears at this point I was also signed up to PPI, however i do not ever remember this being so.

 

Having closely studied the contents of the SAR it appears:

 

looking at the comms log sheet.

 

13/10/2003 Decision is REFER

20/10/2003 application pending.

2003/11/11 decision is accept.

 

which tallies with no PPI charges till

17/12/2003     PPI                        £0.85   
the 1st statement after activation

 

sorry but how can someone sign me up to PPI when the credit card the PPI will protect is not even approved??

 

I require all PPI refunded as per my enclosed spreadsheet and FOS customer questionnaire .

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...