Jump to content
anna1980

Problem with Lowell and old Oakam loan

Recommended Posts

I am not sure if you can see picture so that is Oakam reply:

 

Please find enclosed with this letter a CD with all the available information you have requested from Oakam.

Call recording are normally held for duration of 2 years, so these are provided where possible.

Please be aware that Oakam's customers do not fill out application forms directly. They undergo an interview process and the information they provide is filled in by the customer service representative that is conducting the application. In this instance the applications have been provided as screenshots.

Regarding the statements provided, these show all the charges and interest due on the agreement as per contract.

Please be aware that the outstanding balance owed on your most recent loan has been assigned to Lantern (formally Motormile Finance UK Limited) on 15/09/2017. Thus, any concerns regarding balances or payments need to be sent to them.

 

We have been told that debt was sold to Lowell, now in letter that giving different company. Confusing 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, London1971 said:

And from the date of last payment you should be able to work out if it is statute barred or not.  In the meanwhile do not answer any calls from Lowell, just ignore them.  It's unenforceable anyway as they haven't returned your CCA

 

original loan was taken earlier but on 27/12/2012 he took top up which total was 5,000.

don't understand why Oakam added another contractual interest for 29/04/2015-11/03/2019 if they sold debt on 15/09/2017??

 

image5.pdf

 

 

we have received letter from Lowell telling us that they requested information from Oakam and we might have to wait for 40 days for they reply.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also dont understand why but it can be challenged. Why have they given a redress payment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

None of this matters, because Lowell have just told you they can't find the CCA, so it's unenforceable anyway. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

on statement shows that last payment of 5.00 was made on 31/05/2013. Why on credit report it shows end date 28/09/2013?

 

but when we were running credit report it showed that :

 

He has two loans under settled accounts:

Lowell Portfolio (balance on 07/02/18)

Start date: 27/12/2012

Default balance: £5311

Last delinquent date:Sept 2013

End date: 28/09/2013

Start balance: 0

If you go to account history:

Date: January 2018

Status: default 

Balance: £10,785

 

Second loan - Oakam Ltd

Balance on 15/09/2017 - £0

Start date: 27/12/2012

Default balance: £7474

Last delinquent date: September 2013

End date: 28/09/2013

Start balance - £0

Fixed payment- £333

Account history 

Date: August 2017

Status:settled 

Balance: £0

Date: July 2017

Status: default

Balance: £6903

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the date on your Credit Report is the default date. Statute barred goes from the final payment, It will be Statute barred 31st May 2019. Also it will disappear from your Credit File September 2019, 6 years after default.

 

The likelihood is that they will not produce a CCA at anytime soon, I wouldn't even bother worrying about this, it's highly unlikely that they will.  On the off chance that they do, you can run it past this forum.

 

Please, please please do not respond to any phone calls or emails though, or make any offers to pay.  This debt is now on the verge of being 100% unenforceable.  Do not spoil this by paying them anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

of course we won't pay. What will happen if they will send us exactly this same information what Oakam send us on CD? Loan was approved online. Just wondering if screenshoot will be counted as CCA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

let it run.

it'll take them a while to find the CCA 

and even if its considered enforceable by them, it might not be

and they'll still have to go thru the PAP letter of claim protocol

 

and you have a month to reply to them

and it'll probably take a month to issue a court claim.

by that time it will be statute barred.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Tweets

  • Our picks

    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 17 replies
    • I am new here but very glad to find my way here and would welcome any input.
       
      i purchased a brand new campervan conversion from Hillside Leisure (175 miles from our home) on July 26th for £31,000 and, within 48 hours, during a storm, the alarm began to sound incessantly. We could not get it to stop, even after trying everything listed in the manual. We phoned Hillside on Saturday July 28th around 2.00pm. The young man who answered the phone said he would seek the advice of their technician and call us back, which he did. The technician told us that they, Hillside, couldn’t help, but that we should take the van to Nissan (the van is a Nissan) as the fault would lie with one of their components.
       
      • 42 replies
×
×
  • Create New...