Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello All   Update   As per post #83, I had mentioned that for some unusual  reason, there had been two deadlines from the court for responding, namely the 18th of January 2021 and 1st of Feb 2021.   With everyones great help I filed in the response by the18th of Jan 2021. I think I was bit concerned that the claimant, Mike Ashley may use the second deadline as a chance to add a supplementary statement in response to my defence.    Well, Mike Ashely has in fact does exactly this. He has responded and filed a supplementary witness statement and has responded to all the defence points. He has addressed most the issues I had raised in my defence.     His Supplementary WS is dated 30 January 2021 and his solicitors emailed it to me on the 17th of February 2021.   Not sure what to do, but he seems to have amended everything which i could have used as a loophole leaving me with the thought of , should we have waited till the 2nd deadline ie 1ist Feb2021 and submitted the defence rather than the 18th January 2021. this would have deprived him of the chance to response with a supplementary WS. Thats what really had a worried me and I raised it a few times on this platform.     Not sure now because he has kind of amended a few things, removed the incorrect exhibit ( where the signages had belonged to a different site, and called it a clerical error).   Will post his redacted supplementary WS later as at work now.   Thanks all
    • An eye-opening new report from the payment processor Worldpay found so-called 'mobile wallet' payments were used for just under a third of all online transactions in 2020. View the full article
    • Adding to all the other difficulties (address for service, proving an agreement, obtaining enforcement even if you succeeded) that have been raised: Has the obligation to repay yet arisen?   You say the agreement was repayment once the divorce settlement occurred, but then point out settlement has yet to occur!.
    • The Chancellor should use next week's Budget to simplify the Isa system and scrap the trend of having one for 'almost every day of the week', savings industry experts have said. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

NSL will not refund my surety HELP


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 736 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I called up the payment line to claim back my surety fee today after my vehicle had b


een clamped by the NSL on behalf of the DVLA for no tax.

 

I was told I had until yesterday to claim it back.

It was stated in the leaflet i was given that i had 15 days to claim. Today is the 15th day, but the payment centre said yesterday was the 15th day.

 

I had my car clamped on Tuesday 29 January.

Today is Wednesday 13 February which is exactly 15 days after my vehicle was clamped.

 

I am awfully distressed about this as i desperately need the refund. What can i do? Where can i take this?

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please could you explain what this surety is. How does it work? How much is it?

 

Maybe you could point us to the leaflet or posted up here in PDF format

Link to post
Share on other sites

From that leaflet:

“How to claim a refund of the surety fee

Produce a valid tax disc to either the vehicle pound or a DVLA local office, within 14 days of the vehicle’s release. After this period, you will lose the surety fee.”

 

It says 14 days, not 15.

it also says “from vehicle’s release”:

when was it released?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's my reading as well. But also I'd like to know about the surety. The leaflet you've given this is a DVLA leaflet – so this may be a DVLA rule and not an NSL rule.

 

Who does the money go to? Who decides the figure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

That leaflet i sent you seems to be an older version. i cannot find the current one which is what i have been given. I have taken photos of mine - sorry its been crumpled up! Just trying to upload for you

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

IMG_5596.jpgIMG_5596.jpg

 

IMG_5598.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is what the surety means: "You can pay a 'surety' (deposit) if you don't tax the vehicle before you get it released. It costs £160 for cars or motorcycles, and up to £700 for other vehicles." Then it says: " You must get your vehicle tax within 15 days and contact the vehicle pound. After this period you will lose your surety fee"

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

My car was released on 29 January - 15 days ago today

Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea who the money goes too. They payment people could only give me an email address in which to take the matter further which is an NSL email address. Therefore i assume the NSL keep the money

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but we need attachments but up in PDF format – and certainly if any files at all should be presented the right way up so that it is reasonably easy to read.

 

It's very hard work trying to help people on this forum and we do expect people to help themselves a bit.

 

Please will you post up the document in the way that you would like to have it presented to you if somebody asked you for help.

 

Thanks

 

Also, I gather the basics of the surety but you haven't really said anything about where the money goes, who decides the figure, is it a DVLA requirement or is that an NSL requirement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the surety is set by DVLA. I expect that it goes to DVLA although maybe NSL get a cut. https://www.gov.uk/get-a-clamped-or-impounded-vehicle-released

 

However, as far as I can see that if there is some misunderstanding as to the 14/15 days, then you have to take it up with DVLA.

 

If we could see the up-to-date document then we might have a better understanding

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I am still searching. The DVLA do not have it on their website and nor do the gov. website - they have everything but. I have found a few people linking to a download of it on the gov. site but the page is not found. Very suspicious. All i have is my hard copy! Still searching

Link to post
Share on other sites
just get the clamp cut off with welder or if its chain buy a chain cutter

 

This is an absurd, dangerous and unhelpful suggestion

Link to post
Share on other sites
just get the clamp cut off with welder or if its chain buy a chain cutter

 

A) By the fact the surety has been paid, the OP will also have paid for the clamp to be released. The OP was asking about getting their surety back.

 

B) Even if the clamp was still on, if the OP uses force to remove it, causing damage, and gets seen to do so : how does getting a conviction for criminal damage help the OP?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...