Jump to content


ParkingEye ANPR PCN Claimform - Town Quay 2, Southampton


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 206 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You can provide your interpretation of the law in support of your defence, but that's just your interpretation, unless you qualify it with pointing to the legislation that applies, or other suitable sources referring to it. Therefore,  quoting relevant legislation and case law is how you'll demonstrate that you have a winning argument. The claimant has done just that in their WS.

 

Say as much as you need to in order to make the best possible impact with your arguments.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, ok. The attachment you posted is called 'Claimants WS', so I thought you'd had theirs. I only glanced at it briefly.

 

Any detail that you feel is needed to support your defence and then the brief arguments presented at the hearing should be included within your WS. This is 'the' time for detail.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, hope everyone's doing fine.

 

Court date is getting nearer and nearer, the date for submitting my witness statement even more so (I am going to submit by mid-week this coming week).

 

Here is an initial yet substantial draft - it's still a work in progress - I am going to add more one or two more points/arguments to it, do some tidying up, and of course proofread it all 

 

Any tips/suggestions, additions/fixes are greatly welcome.

 

Claimant's WS has just arrived too, I've had a quick gander through it, nothing sticks out to be honest, apart from the fact that the Claimant is going to try to argue that the land is not 'relevant land', which I found quite amusing as it's a weak argument. Hoping the judge sees through it. As usual PE will be sending an LPC legal perp to represent them and state the facts in the case - so the person who prepared the WS won't be present/attending the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please dont use hosting sites

Attach the pdf to a post.... click choose file in the base of the msg box

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it isnt relevant land they cant create a keeper liability under any circumstance.

 

Now the LPC person HAS to be on the SRA roll of solicitors or they dont have a right of audience and wont be able to speak.

 

Now judges have a lot of powers so they may allow them to present their case but go armed with a copy of the civil courts rights of audience legislation and argue that as the rep isnt a lawyer and not employed by PE they arent in a position to state that what is presented is actually a statement of the truth and certainly cant be cross examined on its veracity so you ask that not only is the rep bisbarred from speaking but you want their WS treated as hearsay evidence or dismissed in its entirety

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan it ALL up to ONE multipage PDF please read upload carefully.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need to see the claimant WS first please,

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

need the exhibits too but not each cover sheet.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would rather you mention a specific exhibit that you're after (aside from maybe the landowner contract which I'm hesitant on disclosing due to confidentiality reasons), since there's pages and pages of the stuff.

 

Let me know which ones you want, and I'll post up. Obviously there's NTKs you've already seen, LBA letters you've already seen and pages and pages of Beavis arguments, which are irrelevant, since I'm not even going to bother disputing that angle (genuine pre-estimate of loss etc.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ofcourse didn't mean the existing printed out cases they refer too.

what about photos or sign layouts and types?
 

anything that we've not already seen that they intend to rely upon.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the signage is included in the pdf i (wrongly) labelled 'claimants WS' on page 5 of the thread. This same extract of the signage was presented in the WS.

 

The claimant also provided photos of some of the signage in their actual WS, obviously not in this thread yet, will post this up asap.

 

As you can see from my WS I'm intending to dispute one of the signs. 

 

Also, any guidance in relation to changes you'd recommend I make in point 8 in my WS will be appreciated.

 

Sorry for the bad quality in some of the images, tried to adjust the lighting in the room but wasn't hugely successful.

 

If you want me to retake any of them let me know, ta.

 

new_doc_2020-03-10_19_54.04_20200310195702.pdf

 

Just a heads up - I’ll be posting my WS by COB today in order to meet the deadline, so even if you could review parts of it, that would be useful, ta.

Edited by Incontro
Link to post
Share on other sites

what date is the hearing..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so need posting by close of play Friday or sat am.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, because instructions are for recipients to receive copies fourteen days in advance of hearing date. Latest I can leave it to is tomorrow before Royal Mail last collection time, but I’m not risking and sending it today. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as indicated earlier

you are a litigant in person and given certain leeway.

14 days is Friday sat am is quite acceptable as is Monday am.

you could even deliver it to the court by hand Monday that would br acceptable too.

 

as for posting PE copy, there is no rush on that at all can go by 2nd class with free proof of posting.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already sent after a proof-read and some minor changes. I don't have a printer at home, and was out and about today, so today was ideal for me to send.

 

Thanks to all that helped. I spent a lot of time and effort preparing for this, and also did a lot of research. Lost countless evenings and multiple weekends. However at least I'm now confident I have a reasonable chance at winning. 

 

If I have any questions about the day, I'll post up here. In the meantime, any pointers/tips on what to mention on the day (in terms of talking points) can be useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/03/2020 at 16:21, Incontro said:

Thanks EB.

 

Just a question - can I quote civil cases in my WS where there's no publicly available transcript?

I'm guessing the answer is no?

It is always public just that the costs of getting a  transcript is crippling. The court report by another party witht eh claim number and court plus the date of the hearing is fine, you will see that elsewhere if you look

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...