Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx100uk.   Not sure that I completely understand your reply, that said, thank you for taking the time to reply.   I did follow your link to the GDPR thread and Subject Access Requests. I can't remember if that was the term that the ICO used.    I am not sure that it would have been a SAR, my bank didn't insist that I apply in writing and ultimately it wasn't my bank that was being obtuse.   Then again, it may well be the case that the guy at the ICO did indeed use the term Subject Access Request. As I said,  I got a call from a 0300 number and decided to answer it, half in the expectation of it being a spam call.   So is SAR a direct consequence of GDPR? If yes, it is ironic that I am using to circumnavigate Lloyd banks flawed interpretation of the Data Protection Act.
    • CAB should never have said what they did.   If someone earns over the threshold, even if only 15p, yes in theory the whole amount will be reported as overpaid.    So yes you should expect a letter advising of a debt.   Suggest that your partner follows the appeal process and submits the mandatory reconsideration.  Put the arguments to a DWP Decision Maker. It might not change the decision already made, but worth giving it a go. Perhaps the CAB advisor who gave their opinion can assist.   Uniform is not an expenses that can be deducted in relation to earnings considered for benefit purposes. Your partner is employed and the employers should provide any uniform. Sounds a bit odd to deduct an amount for uniform and this should be queried with the employers. Not quite sure on the legality of the deduction.
    • Does your claimant commitment state to update journal or job application section of your account to provide the evidence?   If not, then written or even verbal would suffice. If the commitment isn't tight enough to state where to put your evidence then there is nothing they can do.
    • The onus is on the claimant to claim correctly. 15p or £2 over the limit is still over the limit.   You mention an alowable expense, where does it state uniform is allowable, it's normally travel, care fee's or pension contributions. Normally uniform is provided by the employer, so the DWP tend to ignore this.   Yes she will get a letter regarding paying it back, but she is lucky she isn't facing a fraud case.
    • Pardon late reply, had a busy last few days. I will make enquiries to the Council or Valuations Agency tomorrow when they are open.   I am a little apprehensive about getting the dentist involved although I wasn't warned about the new parking system at the time.   I have photos but will need to reduce the mb size of them as 4.5 mb is maximum upload on here. They will also need editing to blot out reg numbers etc.   I was given 28 days from CE to cough up after the POPLA decision and that will expire in a few days time. I intend to take this all the way and to save further action [e.g. debt collectors with the £100 rocketing to the thick end of a Grand]   write to CE and tell them take me straight to Court as all letters will be ignored.    There are 2 photos from my evidence previous post [Docs 1 pdf 2.81 mb] First is the view I had approaching car park to the right, this differs enormously from google street view.   Even with just 1 car in the carpark can you see any signs ? There is a small road sign in that photo too that was left behind following the roadworks and temporary traffic lights that hid the sign at the front.   Second photo is a view from where I parked no wonder I did not see it, in fact the angle is worse viewing from drivers seat as the pole is in line with the tree
  • Our picks

Sweet Justice

Retailer offered tape to repair cracks in boots

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 247 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'd be grateful if anybody could give advise me on my rights for the following issue.

 

I bought a pair of waterproof boots from a well-know firm that sells outdoor & rock climbing gear.

The boots have developed cracks on the panel that runs around the shoe and is attached to the sole.

 

The sole itself is fine.

The boots however are no longer fit for purpose.

 

I showed them to the shop assistant who told me that it's general wear and tear and there's nothing they can do about it.

I asked if they could repair them and was told I could (buy) and try a tent repair tape, but that they weren't sure if it would work.

 

I am in doubt as to whether that is really the case and was wondering if anyone knows what my rights are in this situation.

Thank you.

Any advice will be much appreciated.

 

Sweet Justice

Edited by dx100uk
format

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago did you buy them? When did they break. How much are they worth?


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if it is the same well know store I am thiking of they have a 1 year guarantee on their boots but the welt coming away isnt wear and tear anyways. i wouldnt put up with the respnse from the store, get on to head office and ask them to take over the complaint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How long ago did you buy them? When did they break. How much are they worth?
you need to answer this question before we can go any further

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies everyone. I'm guessing that I bought them over two years ago. I'm sorry, my health condition affects my memory. I can never give precise answers, especially when it comes to dates and timelines. Two years may seem like a long time, but since they are snow boots, it's only for a short time in the year that I actually wear them. For the mileage I've covered, they should have lasted longer. I'm a slow walker as I have fibromyalgiya. So again, it's not like I've been very active/hiking in them. Is it ok to post picture here to explain exactly what the damage is and why I feel it shouldn't be classed as wear and tear but a fault with the material used? Thank you.

 

Edit: They were £60. They have been redesigned and priced at £80 now. Oh and another thing. When I first bought them I left a review on the website. It would have been a good way to determine the date of purchase. However there's no reviews on the website anymore. I am wondering if others experienced the same problem.

Edited by Sweet Justice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Am I to assume that my complaint isn't valid due to reasons given? Would appreciate any feed back. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry. It seems your post got lost here. feel free to post up pics, so we can see if its is an inherent fault or if its wear and tear.

 

Also, how long after you bought them did they fail?


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as it is over 2 years it has to be a latent fault, ie a manufacturing problem so the retailer is within their rights to tell you it isnt to do with them.

I agree that wear and tear is unlikely but materails do degrade with age so you should find out who the maker's rep in the UK is and get on to them to ahve them properly assessed. An exchange for a nice new pair would be a reasonable outcome but be prepared to accept a voucher towards the cost of another pair of boots.

You could ask whether they ahve been tested by a company like SATRA to detemine what should be the lifespan of a pair of the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thank you for your reply. I am sorry I can’t remember when the cracks first appeared. I believe that due to the location of the damage and short time I’ve worn them (in the winter for short trips to the shops etc), the damage should not have occurred at all. Here are the pics showing the damaged and I am convinced it is due the the material not being flexible enough to bend with the natural movements of the foot.

 

edit: sorry image too large to upload. I don’t know how to resize it. Will try later God willing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

problem is the burden of proof is for you to show unless there is a known problem already with them, hence asking them about whether they can show you thieir testing results. Salt can degrade leather and most materials if left to dry into the fabric so again you will ahve to show that you took reasonable care of them.

If I bought a car and it had a 7 year warranty that would be void if I diont keep the oil topped up, radiator fluid levels correct and various other small things that need to be done. likewise the service record will have to be fully up to date so knowing about recalls on that model, known faults etc make it easier to argue that any problem is under the warranty. you will have to do your homework if you wnat to get anywhere with this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...