Hi All.
I was going to resurrect the old thread just for the latest judgement, this is an appeal which confirms the view that the coa emanates from the default notice date of course.
I know this is an old thread, but there has recently been a test case which proves the point that a COA is in fact the date of the 87DN.
Therefore it should be considered as such when calculating the COA and the subsequent barr date.
It ties up the large thread nicely
https://www.bailii.or
Here is a piece from one of the sols on the losing side. No links nor name. I dont think it is against any rules to post, information off the net, otherwise these pages would be blank.
"he Court of Appeal handed down it’s judgment in the case of Doyle v PRA Group UK Limited 2019 EWCA Civ 12 this week.
The case raised the question of whether limitation ran from the date the debtor breached their contract or from when the default notice expired.
It was widely thought that limitation ra