Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Identity theft help


ayza1234
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have recently turned 18 and have tried opening a bank account however I was declined.

I was told in the branch to check my credit report at Experian and Equifax.

 

I have been able to check Equifax and have discovered there are 5 defaults from different companies.

All these defaults are from quite some time ago and show the wrong date of births.

 

I have disputed these defaults with the Equifax but they have come back and said the companies have said the information is accurate and they cannot change it.

 

The companies that the defaults are from

Lowell,

Tesco,

Virgin and

Shop direct.

 

Please,

can you advise me to what to do next and how to approach the companies involved?

 

Should I communicate by Letter or Email and also is there any templates I could use?

 

I have already reported this to the police and action fraud and have a crime reference number.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant take out credit as you were too young.

 

so someone [sorry but its usually a family member]

has taken out credit in your name with

 

Tesco [credit card?}

virgin [digital tv broadband card or mobile debt?]

shop direct [a catalogue company trading under various names ]

 

 

lowells are a debt buyer so you'll need to know who the original creditor was in this instance.

have you moved in recent years??

 

what dates were these accounts taken out on?

 

moved to the identity theft forum

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

on my credit report it says

 

Tesco mobile telecoms,

virgin mobile telecoms,

mail agent order agency from shop direct.

 

Lowell is from 19/12/2016 and the default date is 29/06/2017.

 

Second Lowell is from 14/01/2017 and default date is 18/04/2017.

 

Tesco mobile is from 09/01/2014 and default date is 17/08/2014.

 

Virgin Mobile is from 12/12/2013 and default days is 12/10/2016.

 

On the Lowell defaults it says communication supplier from Lowell so I think they may be mobile providers but I will have to find out from them.

 

As I have not moved house in recent years.

 

Thanks for your help

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've spaced the above to make things clearer..

 

so all bar one account [shop direct ]

 

the rest are all mobile phone contracts either sold to lowells [a debt buyer and a Debt collection agency by whomever the original provider was]

or

still with the original providers

 

 

sadly and again i'll say this..we typically findout that the person that did all this is a family member , maybe not directly related or living with you, but someone that knows enough of your personal details to be able to do it.

 

if you have only just turned 18 then most of them are unenforceable [you were 14 and 16yrs old and cant legally enter into any agreements/contracts] and whomever owns them wont go near a courtroom door, but that's not your issue, the fact that they are on your credit file and defaulted IS...its FRAUD for whomever did this to for it in every case.

 

the one clue that might help you is the shop direct account as that is a credit agreement an must be signed even if online by a tick box] and would have been done under an IP address etc etc , so send them [shop direct an sar]

 

that's should reveal things.

 

on the SAR tell them that this account is subject to a criminal investigation of fraud and give the crime ref number.

specifically ask for all the details of the sign up process

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This might get a load of hate here... but address Lowell with a letter explaining the situation - The CRN.

They will be forced to close down the account... And remove all info.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that you have no idea what the values are of these alleged debts. Certainly, the rule is that any minors' contracts for money lent or to be lent are void.

 

That should protect you from any potential legal actions but unfortunately it doesn't protect your credit file.

 

Obviously you should take the advice above – to send the SAR and also the letter to Lowell. I would suggest that you also send a letter to Equifax – and to the other credit references, having first checked them to see if they also are carrying these markers against your file.

 

I suggest that you draft letter and post it here first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I've just realised that these are probably not loan contracts. They are probably contracts for mobile phone services. I'm afraid that they could be enforceable against minors. Anyway, take the advice above and we will do our best to help you sort it out. Don't imagine that it's going to these, I'm afraid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How have you disputed the information with Equifax? If you did it by letter, please can you post the letter up here in PDF format

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes and thats fine...

Keep us posted on what they come back with

 

Bare in mind that Mobile Contracts come with credit checks... On the DOB it should show as underage... Orrrrrrrrr

 

They have mistaken you for someone with a similar name...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post the letter up here before you send it please. Don't send off any letter until we have checked it and given you the best advice.

 

Do you have a copy of what you set out in the online form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

26/01/2019

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATIONSSUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST

ACCOUNT REF NUMBER XXXXX3513

 

I have reported the crime to the police and the crime reference number is

I have been a victim of Identity Theft and have not took out any form of credit with your creditor, BT. I have found this out after checking my credit report with Equifax which has a default registered from you for £ 237. This account has the wrong date of birth also registered 11/09/1998. I have also received pre-legal assessment letter from you for this account. I would like this default to be removed from my credit profile.

Please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

Please note that I require disclosure of any personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

This Subject Access Request includes - but is not limited to any data you hold about me in respect of any matter and held in any form including; statements, notes, screen notes, recordings, internal correspondence and external correspondence. Please note that this Subject Access Request is not limited to the account/reference number mentioned above but that number has been provided purely as a starting reference for you.

For the avoidance of doubt, and as stated above, this Subject Access Request requires disclosure of ALL personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

there is no applicable fee for this data disclosure – unless you feel that my request is manifestly unfounded, excessive or repetitive – in which case you have a duty to let me know without any delay.

Under the new GDPR regime, you must satisfy this data disclosure request as soon as possible and in any event within one month.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return however, you are not entitled to impose any formality upon me or to require that I complete any particular form or template before you comply with your statutory duty.

I also require you to confirm to me that you are processing my personal data, how you acquired it, for what purpose you are processing it and also to identify all the parties with whom you have shared it. You are required to provide this information regardless of whether you believe that the substantive disclosure satisfies the conditions which permit you to impose a charge.

I also required to know whether my data has been subject to any automatic processing which has resulted in decisions or suggested decisions being made in respect of me. Also, has my personal data been used in any way to categorise me or to place me on any lists. If so please explain.

Finally, I should remind you that you have a duty to make clear the meaning of any codes or shorthand which you use in relation to my personal data.

If I do not hear from you then I will assume that this Statutory Request is satisfactory and that the one-month timescale has started.

If you fail to comply with all of your obligations, I will make an immediate complaint to the Information Commissioner about your statutory breach – and without any further notice to you.

This may also lead to legal action in the county court and a judgement will then be forwarded to the FCA.

 

hi this is the draft letter i created. Please can you let me know of any changes required thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

always by royal mail

 

however

I would not mix a complaint with the sar.

 

just send the sar as is with the additional line from the bottom of post 4 as a leader.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's absolutely right. You cannot mix and match these letters. These people are incapable of understanding that there are two requests being made in a single letter.

 

Can you redraft both of them and post them up please. Your letter which alleges the identity theft needs a lot of work.

 

Also your threat to send a judgement to the FCA is meaningless

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is it you are asking to remove the default?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Virgin have replied to the Equifax dispute and agreed to remove the default. I just need to remove defaults from Lowell, Tesco mobile and shop direct.

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

26/01/2019

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

THIS ACCOUNT IS SUBJECT TO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF FRAUD CRIME REFERENCE NUMBER

 

GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATIONSSUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST

ACCOUNT REF NUMBER XXXXX3513

 

Please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

Please note that I require disclosure of any personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

This Subject Access Request includes - but is not limited to any data you hold about me in respect of any matter and held in any form including; statements, notes, screen notes, recordings, internal correspondence and external correspondence. Please note that this Subject Access Request is not limited to the account/reference number mentioned above but that number has been provided purely as a starting reference for you.

For the avoidance of doubt, and as stated above, this Subject Access Request requires disclosure of ALL personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

there is no applicable fee for this data disclosure – unless you feel that my request is manifestly unfounded, excessive or repetitive – in which case you have a duty to let me know without any delay.

Under the new GDPR regime, you must satisfy this data disclosure request as soon as possible and in any event within one month.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return however, you are not entitled to impose any formality upon me or to require that I complete any particular form or template before you comply with your statutory duty.

I also require you to confirm to me that you are processing my personal data, how you acquired it, for what purpose you are processing it and also to identify all the parties with whom you have shared it. You are required to provide this information regardless of whether you believe that the substantive disclosure satisfies the conditions which permit you to impose a charge.

I also required to know whether my data has been subject to any automatic processing which has resulted in decisions or suggested decisions being made in respect of me. Also, has my personal data been used in any way to categorise me or to place me on any lists. If so please explain.

Finally, I should remind you that you have a duty to make clear the meaning of any codes or shorthand which you use in relation to my personal data.

If I do not hear from you then I will assume that this Statutory Request is satisfactory and that the one-month timescale has started.

If you fail to comply with all of your obligations, I will make an immediate complaint to the Information Commissioner about your statutory breach – and without any further notice to you.

This may also lead to legal action in the county court.

Yours faithfully,

ive updated this SAR letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter you are doing at the moment is to Equifax – yes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR letter is fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, when this all seems to have been sorted, I suggest that you send an SAR to each one of the companies which have lodged a default against you to check what they have on you.

 

I'm afraid to say that although you may sorted out now – it doesn't take much in the future for their computers to pick it out again and to start the whole process once more.

 

After they have remove the default you then need to make sure that they hold no data on you at all if you have had no previous dealings with them and if they do then that will be grounds for a complaint to the ICO.

 

I'm afraid that this is not an easy process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have reported the crime to the police and the crime reference number is

I have been a victim of Identity Theft and have not taken out any form of credit with your creditor, BT. I have found this out after checking my credit report with Equifax which has a default registered from you for £ 237. This account has the wrong date of birth also registered 11/09/1998 which means the account was taken out when I was underage and a minor. I have also received pre-legal assessment letter from you for this account. I would like this default to be removed from my credit profile.

 

I have written this so far for the identity theft letter. What else could I write? Thanks

 

The SAR letter is for Lowell. I am going to create a SAR letter for each of the companies and send it off to them. I have disputed the defaults through Equifax online and have received a reply from Virgin Mobile so far saying they are removing the default. I am also going to write an identity theft letter to each of the companies asking to remove the defaults. Should I do this?

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...