Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Received TfL letter for using sister's travel pass


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1832 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have attached the letter from TFL below. I have folded the letter so I do not disclose my personal info.

 

Well, they seem to think you are lying about your statement in your initial letter that you had had taken your sister's pass by mistake......

If you want to continue to claim that expect them to ask you to produce YOUR pass (which you don't have) or evidence that you bought one (which again, you don't have). If you try to claim you had your own pass but have lost it, and paid in cash (so don't have a receipt) : they'd be skeptical, and who could blame them.

 

You can try to be honest and contrite, but (having been caught, and fibbed in your first letter) they may well conclude your contrition is resulting from being caught, not over the offence itself.

What did you say at interview when stopped? don't forget they'll have access to those notes, too.

 

Usual advice is to be honest as far as you can (no need to admit to additional offences unless they specifically ask, though), and hope for an administrative settlement. You haven't really given them any reasons not to prosecute you, though ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I cant remember all of what was asked at the interview.

There was one question where they asked if you agree that you have used your sisters pass.

To that I replied yes.

At the end they said If I would like to say anything.

I said the same thing I said in my previous letter to them. That I had mistakenly taken the pass while rushing out of the house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically you knew you didnt have a valid pass and that your out of date one was anyway elsewhere. You told a story to the TfL inspector that didnt convince and now you want us to provide you with a better version of that story.

 

That hasnt happened.

 

I bet your sister is delighted that her pass is at risk because you couldnt be bothered to buy a ticket or renew your pass for whatever reason. They have different codes for male and female, staff, student, OAP etc so knew at first glance yours was a wrong un.

 

Best stick with what you have already said as trying again other than telling them you thought you would just risk it and it didnt pay off will make them even more determined to see this through to the bitter end

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right. I should have said from beginning that I used my sister's pass.

 

But I dont want you to give me a better version of that story. I am going to apologise to TFL for using my sisters pass in the next letter, which I should have done in the first letter.

 

Thanks for your thoughts about my case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear sir/madam

I am writing this letter in response to the letter from TFL on xx January 2019.

I would like to apologise again for my actions. I am deeply ashamed by what I have done and learnt my lesson to never repeat it again. On the 12th, I was running late for work, I had little sleep the previous night due to the presentation I had to give the next day. I took my sisters pass as I knew it was valid and would not have to queue up for the ticket. I am extremely sorry for not mentioning this in my previous letter and saying that I mistakenly took my sister's pass.

 

I have done wrong and I am extremely ashamed of my behaviour. I have learnt my lesson the hard way and would never repeat it again. I now understand that using someone else’s pass is a serious criminal offence and would never think of doing it again.

 

As mentioned before, I am willing to pay any fines or fares that are due to TFL as a result of my actions. Also, any extra administration charges that cost TFL because of my case. I wish to apologise to TFL employee concerned with my case and the TFL team for the extra administration work.

 

I have recently started working in the IT sector after completing my engineering degree for 3 years. A criminal record would hinder my chances of continuing working in my career and doing what I love. As explained before the nature of my work requires me to start shift at 4:00 a.m. For this, an Airport ID is required to access the building, a criminal record might lead to this being withdrawn and I might lose my job. Therefore, I am sincerely hoping TFL would allow me to solve the matter out of court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear sir/madam

I am writing this letter in response to the letter from TFL on xx January 2019.

I would like to apologise again for my actions. I am deeply ashamed by what I have done and learnt my lesson to never repeat it again. On the 12th, I was running late for work. I took my sisters pass as I knew it was valid and would not have to queue up for the ticket. I am extremely sorry for not mentioning this in my previous letter and saying that I mistakenly took my sister's pass.

 

I have done wrong and I am extremely ashamed of my behaviour. I have learnt my lesson the hard way and would never repeat it again. I now understand that using someone else’s pass is a serious criminal offence and would never think of doing it again.

 

Would you please allow me to pay any fines or fares that are due to TFL as a result of my actions. Also, any extra administration charges that cost TFL because of my case. I wish to apologise to TFL employee concerned with my case and the TFL team for the extra administration work.

 

I have recently started working in the IT sector after completing my engineering degree for 3 years. A criminal record would hinder my chances of continuing working in my career and doing what I love. As explained before the nature of my work requires me to start shift at 4:00 a.m. For this, an Airport ID is required to access the building, a criminal record might lead to this being withdrawn and I might lose my job. Therefore, I am sincerely hoping TFL would allow me to solve the matter out of court.[/i][/i]

Link to post
Share on other sites

answer me this question...

remember we are anon so no need to lie ...we are here to help...

 

if you hadn't been caught how long would you have used the card for?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

I usually panic if I’m about to do something wrong.

I would try to avoid it at every cost.

 

I used it that day to avoid getting late.

I would not have used the card unless there was an emergency.

 

I understand that it is not acceptable though but I would have used it again.

Given my situation now and what I had to go through, I cannot even think of doing it again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right that's the implications you have to deal with then..and thus what they are thinking and NEEDS addressing..

 

if you hadn't been caught , the use would have continued ???

 

are you saying I would have used it again the next day..

or

do you mean if the necessity to use it again came about again in the future you would use it?

 

trying to understand if you mean for 'one-off' needs you'd have done the same again

or

you intended to use it till you cold afford to buy a ticket.

 

if you solely mean..damn I forget to get a monthly [whatever pass] I've not got time today so i'll chance it and use the pass

then I wouldnt need it for the rest of the week / month as i'd be buying a pass in my name...

 

I know this might all seem pedantic, but to an investigator that is phishing to understand your motives and thus made an error, addressing your attitude to its usage by you in the future could be the key here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last one correctly explains my situation.

 

I thought I would use my sisters pass that day, and buy a new pass as soon as the opportunity arrives.

 

I have already said and I truly mean it that I would not be using anyone’s pass in future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

great stuff.

 

let me muse on this and i'll put a few ideas up for a new letter for posting monday for you..

90% yours is good but needs a focus and the correct way to say things and the correct way to reply...format wise.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear mr xxxx [use his name from the letter they sent you on the xx jan]

 

thank you for your letter dated xx January 2019, the contents of which are dulely noted.

 

Having since sought out appropriate advise, i have come to the realisation that my own understanding upon the seriousness of using someone else's pass was somewhat flawed. Mine had expired, i viewed using my sisters' as to who would care, i'd be buying my new pass later that day, i had to get to work without the delay of buying mine enroute.

I now fully understand that using someone else’s pass is a serious criminal offence and would never think of doing it again.

 

I have recently started working my dream job in the IT sector after completing a 3yrs degree.

On the 12th, I was running late for work, I had little sleep the previous night with nerves and preparing my first presentation ever later that morning.

 

The nature of my work sees me start shift at 4:00 a.m. and an Airport ID is required to access any all areas, a criminal record will lead to this being withdrawn and would hinder my chances of continuing working in my career and doing what I love. Therefore, I am sincerely hoping you will allow me to resolve this matter out of court.

 

I apologise profusely for my actions in this case.

I pride myself on my integrity and honesty and I feel shameful for my moment of very poor judgement.

I wish to apologise to the member of staff concerned and to TFL, I am just so sorry for my actions and the inconvenience caused to all involved.

 

I am happy to make immediate payment of any unpaid fare and all the reasonable costs that my actions have caused and avoid a criminal record thereby allowing me to protect my good name.

 

I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I am very sorry that my stupid misunderstanding has lead to this situation now.

 

Again, I can assure you that I will always ensure to hold a valid pass of my own on any future journeys.

 

I would appreciate your consideration and I sincerely hope that you can show some leniency in this matter.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you stopped:

1a) on entering the “gate line” at the start of your journey?

b) leaving the gate line at the end of your Journey

c) at some interim point?

 

2a) was this by a uniformed individual, or

b) plainclothes RPI?

 

3) did they recite a “caution” +/- ask you to sign their notes

 

4) what time of day was this?

 

part of me is wondering if this was a “random stop”, part of an operation in a high risk area, or a targeted / intelligence led stop .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

4am seems strange to me

but how would they know they were to pick the card up that ONE morning ?? with no previous use?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Precisely so, dx, and part of why I was asking.

Random stop vs. Targeted op on an area noted for high abuse that happened to catch the OP vs. Intel-led / specifically targeted stop, all of which could influence the OP’s chance of an admin settlement (& their approach to maximise chance of an admin settlement!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

wonder what time they got caught?

cause only the sister would know..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For

Random stop vs. Targeted op on an area noted for high abuse that happened to catch the OP vs. Intel-led / specifically targeted stop, “Only the sister would know” is only applicable for the last, and only if it really was just the one time ... !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...