Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks everyone for all your help, but unfortunately my case was dismissed. This is the 2nd time I've had this happen now so I doubt ill be taking on any parking firms in future sadly. The judge said I lost it on the grounds that the sign said I had 28 days to declare who the owner of the vehicle was, and said I should have complied with this.  My costs are Judgment for the claimant £133.33 Issue fee Hearing fee Solicitors costs - total £265 grand total £398.33 Do those costs look about right?
    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax/Birmingham Midshires - repeated warrants/eviction/repo attempts **RESOLVED AGAIN**


WA1306
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

BMS just being nasty you should easy get this overturned

 

you say you've been paying £500PCM on top of CML for how many months now?

did you miss any

i'm wondering if they should now have offered to capitalise the arrears too? 

if you've paid +CML for more than 6mts in a row?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been paying 500 plus cml since January 2019.

There was late payment in July 2019, this was late for about 10 days.

 

In October I only paid cml and nothing towards arrears but next month I paid 2000 towards arrears. 

 

This month, I paid cml plus 200 towards arrears. 

 

In January 2019 when BM applied court for permission arrears were of 1£7k now 12 months later they're about 9000.

 

I have asked BM several times to capitalize arrears but they refused. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

should be an easy walk over for you then this time and IMHO they should have offered capitalisation.

 

however as I bet 90% of the arrears are unlawful penalty fees for every letter/phone call/montly arrears fee, that can all be reclaimed by you (get an sar running) that's why they would do it, should the truth be known .

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Affixed is the letter to send to the lender.  You need to complete the details where there are XXX's (obviously delete the xxx's).  Make sure you have the correct address to send it to and send by Special Delivery so they get it next day and have to sign for it - if you can't afford the special delivery cost then send it by 1st class recorded - you need to be able to prove they received it, so keep the postal receipt safe with a copy of the letter.

WA1306.doc

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn, 

 

Thank you for the letter. Much appreciated.

Do you think there is any point sending letter to lender?

 

When I contacted them last time in November they refused to help and said they gave already applied in court for eviction date.

 

In the past whenever I wrote to t jhy e. They ignored my letters. 

 

Please suggest I'd I should apply to the court to challenge this?

I don't want to leave it till very late.

 

Please suggest as you are expert in dealing with such case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean by contacted them..i bet by phone?/

yes ofcourse send that letter

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I will send the letter. 

 

I did call them on phone in November when I started receiving letters in the post addressed to all occupants that they are applying for eviction date. I called them and they said their solicitors have applied in court for eviction date. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely send the letter - when you go to court you will be able to show the judge a copy of the letter proving that you have tried to get them to negotiate with you - if they don't reply to your letter it will look very bad for them.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, lets get on with your application to the court for a hearing to get the eviction cancelled.  

 

You should print off this N244 form https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=18017

 

Instructions for completing it are as follows:

1.Name
2. Tick Defendant
3. Suspension of eviction
4. No
5. Tick at a hearing
6. 15 minutes
Agreed by all parties: No
7. Write - Not applicable
8. District
9. Both Parties
10. Tick box for attached witness statement
Cross out all options
except The Applicant Believes
11 Sign and cross out all options
except Applicant
Sign and cross out all options
except Applicant. Enter your address and contact details.

 

I will draft a statement for No 10 of the form  and post on here shortly so you can review - I'm assuming that the mortgage is in joint names?

 

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought - are you sure that the letter you have received is an eviction notice?   Given that BM were granted a further 12 months last January and this will have run out - is it not possible that the letter is advising you that they are re-applying for a further extension ?

 

Can you scan the letter up so we can see it please

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, understood - we need to get the N244 done asap   You will need to take the application to the court and hand it in - you will also need to pay a fee  (I'll need to check what that is as I think they may have changed recently ) - they should be able to give you a date for the hearing while you're there.

 

I'll get on with the statement - you need to print off and complete the N244 - are you able to print and make copies of documents ok?

 

How much do you want to commit to paying towards the arrears each month?  - it needs to be an amount you can easily maintain - if you keep missing payments they will keep issuing eviction warrants, so set something you know you won't miss

 

Affixed is a budget sheet you will need to submit with your application - it calculates automatically as you fill it in - make sure you account for everything and don't leave too much over or you'll be expected to pay more towards arrears.   Let me know when you've done it - any questions about filling it in just shout up

Budget Sheet - Blank.xlsx

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ell-enn.  Please send me the statement for N244 so I can complete the form and print copies. 

 

Since January last year I was paying 500 every month but moving forward I offer to pay 200 every month towards arrears. 

 

Do you think if I offer 100 it will make my case any weaker?

 

Do.i need to submit the N244 to the same court I received the eviction notice from?

 

Also, should I wait for response from BM to the letter I am sending tomorrow or can I submit N244 tomorrow afternoon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WA1306 said:

Do you think if I offer 100 it will make my case any weaker?

 

What you can offer depends on what your budget reflects. If you haven't produced a full budget, you can do so here:

 

https://tools.nationaldebtline.org/yourbudget/

 

As long as your expenditure is reasonable and all you can offer is £100 per month, offer that.

 

What does the possession order state, does it state the arrears are to be paid forthwith or is there an instalment plan?

 

If the order states forthwith, the N244 is an application to vary the terms of the order. You should offer to pay the ongoing monthly amount plus the £100 each month (or other affordable amount) towards arrears.  If you aren't eligible for fee remission, there is a £50 application fee to submit the N244. If the application is successful, you will then have a suspended possession order on the agreed terms. It essential that you meet those terms or apply to vary again if they become unaffordable.

Edited by Will Goodfellow
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would submit the N244 as soon as possible - you should take it to the court named on the eviction notice.

Do the budget sheet and see what you have spare to pay towards the arrears each month then let me know so I can put it in the statement

8 minutes ago, Will Goodfellow said:

 

 

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the initial repossession order was granted back in 2009, the term was to pay ongoing monthly payment plus 100 towards arrears every month. 

 

Since 2009 at some point arrears were capitalized and there were no arrears,  I was just paying normal monthly payment. 

 

When in arrears again,  BM applied to court to enforce the suspended representation order.

 

Does this mean the original term to pay 100 towards the arrears becomes applicable?

 

I can easily pay £200 towards the arrears going forward. Don't want to commit to 500 in case I struggle. Ofcourse if I can I will pay more every month to get out of arrears as soon as possible. 

 

I really need to defend this successfully as it will be very difficult situation to be homeless with 4 kids age from 3 to 7.

 

My worry is that I didn't miss any mortgage payment in last 13 months, still BM taking me to the court despite regular monthly payments as well as something every month towards arrears. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can pay £200 per month towards the arrears it will take around 4 years to pay off the £9k arrears and in line with the Norgan case law that should be acceptable to the court.  I'll affix the statement soon - have you done the N244 form and budget sheet ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Affixed is the statement for court. You need to fill in the info where there are XXX's at the top (remove the XXX;s) the info you need will be on the court forms you have received. Read through it carefully to make sure everything is OK. When you print it out, your printer needs to be set for A4 paper (not Letter size)

Now assemble as follows:

 

N244 form, completed and signed

Statement – signed

Copy of letter sent to BM today
Budget Sheet

 

Make sure it is stapled securely together. You will need to take a photocopy of it all for yourself so you have a set to refer to in the hearing. When you hand it in to the court there will be a fee to pay - make sure you take the eviction warrant with you so you get the reduced fee.

Ask the court staff if there will be any free legal advisors on duty on the day of your hearing – they can go into the hearing with you and support your case.

WA1306 Statement for N244.doc

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Ell-enn. I really appreciate your help. 

 

I didn't get chance to complete the budget sheet and N244 yet due to wife being away I was babysitting children. 

 

Will complete everything tonight  will take afternoon off from work tomorrow to go to the court in the afternoon. 

 

Hopefully they can give me the hearing date before the eviction date. 

 

If judge accepts any request will that give lender another suspended repossession order? As the permission to execute current order expired in January. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the judge accepts your offer and cancels the eviction it's probable that he will reinstate the suspended order as there will have to be some terms in place in case you default on the payments again.  Don't forget to make a copy of everything you take to the court so you have it to refer to in the hearing.  Also check if there are any duty legal advisers at court on the day of your hearing.

Any questions just shout up :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't take the form to a solicitor - you complete and sign the form as per the instructions I gave you in a previous post (144)

 

Your wife cannot sign the form as she is not a party to the mortgage - you have to sign and attend the hearing.  Why would you want your wife to sign ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's good

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard of some courts having an appointment system for submission of forms.  Good that they can see you on Thursday and you should get the date for the hearing then.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...