Not sure that I completely understand your reply, that said, thank you for taking the time to reply.
I did follow your link to the GDPR thread and Subject Access Requests. I can't remember if that was the term that the ICO used.
I am not sure that it would have been a SAR, my bank didn't insist that I apply in writing and ultimately it wasn't my bank that was being obtuse.
Then again, it may well be the case that the guy at the ICO did indeed use the term Subject Access Request. As I said, I got a call from a 0300 number and decided to answer it, half in the expectation of it being a spam call.
So is SAR a direct consequence of GDPR? If yes, it is ironic that I am using to circumnavigate Lloyd banks flawed interpretation of the Data Protection Act.
CAB should never have said what they did.
If someone earns over the threshold, even if only 15p, yes in theory the whole amount will be reported as overpaid.
So yes you should expect a letter advising of a debt.
Suggest that your partner follows the appeal process and submits the mandatory reconsideration. Put the arguments to a DWP Decision Maker. It might not change the decision already made, but worth giving it a go. Perhaps the CAB advisor who gave their opinion can assist.
Uniform is not an expenses that can be deducted in relation to earnings considered for benefit purposes. Your partner is employed and the employers should provide any uniform. Sounds a bit odd to deduct an amount for uniform and this should be queried with the employers. Not quite sure on the legality of the deduction.
Does your claimant commitment state to update journal or job application section of your account to provide the evidence?
If not, then written or even verbal would suffice. If the commitment isn't tight enough to state where to put your evidence then there is nothing they can do.
The onus is on the claimant to claim correctly. 15p or £2 over the limit is still over the limit.
You mention an alowable expense, where does it state uniform is allowable, it's normally travel, care fee's or pension contributions. Normally uniform is provided by the employer, so the DWP tend to ignore this.
Yes she will get a letter regarding paying it back, but she is lucky she isn't facing a fraud case.
Pardon late reply, had a busy last few days.
I will make enquiries to the Council or Valuations Agency tomorrow when they are open.
I am a little apprehensive about getting the dentist involved although I wasn't warned about the new parking system at the time.
I have photos but will need to reduce the mb size of them as 4.5 mb is maximum upload on here.
They will also need editing to blot out reg numbers etc.
I was given 28 days from CE to cough up after the POPLA decision and that will expire in a few days time.
I intend to take this all the way and to save further action [e.g. debt collectors with the £100 rocketing to the thick end of a Grand] write to CE and tell them take me straight to Court as all letters will be ignored.
There are 2 photos from my evidence previous post [Docs 1 pdf 2.81 mb]
First is the view I had approaching car park to the right, this differs enormously from google street view.
Even with just 1 car in the carpark can you see any signs ?
There is a small road sign in that photo too that was left behind following the roadworks and temporary traffic lights that hid the sign at the front.
Second photo is a view from where I parked no wonder I did not see it, in fact the angle is worse viewing from drivers seat as the pole is in line with the tree
Don't touch them owe me £500 since January 2019 make excuse after excuse. Seem they always have software problems sending money out. Keep saying they will call back or email nothing been chasing it now for 6 mths the phone staff always have the same banter we will chase it up and get back to you then nothing!