Jump to content


MET PCN - NO NTK Received - BP Stansted SF Connect, CM24 1PY


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 861 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening,

 

I have received a letter from MET Parking Services starting that a fine is now overdue, the problem is, no initial letter was sent.

They are demanding payment within 14 days, what is the best way forward. I go to Stansted a lot and I'm not 100% sure the charge is genuine as it was from a few months ago.

 

Date of incident is the first week of November and this is the first letter I have received regarding this (today).

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan up the document where they use the word FINE please??

 

please complete this:

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(3-Viewing)-nbsp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement

04/11/2018

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

Not received

 

3 Date received

PARKING CHARGE NOTICE REMINDER Received today

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?]

Not received

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

Not received

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal]

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

N/N

 

7 Who is the parking company?

MET PARKING SERVICES

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

BP Stansted SF Connect, CM24 1PY

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

IMG_20190116_225545.jpg

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

My bad, it doesn't mention 'fine'

Link to post
Share on other sites

why didn't you get the NTK?

haven't moved recently have you?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you updated DVLA licence and V5C??

probably went to the old address

 

I believe some of these PPC letters state do not redirect on them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, all of those were done just before our move too. We were at the old address for 5 weeks after the incident, surely it would've come during that period.

 

EDIT: I am speaking on behalf of my father btw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have just looked at the site in question from Google Street View and while I can read the sign at the entrance, it just states BP customers only, Max stay 30 minutes. While the images of the site in question are from 2017, that is the only sign I can see. Up to date photographs should be taken as if the sign at the entrance is the only one, they cannot invent a charge with those details printed for the simple reason. Double yellow lines on private land are basically graffiti and have no legal standing.

 

The first port of call should be the manager of the petrol station.

 

I am going to alert BP via Twitter to see what they have to say on this (if at all)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

they never send them out in time so no surprise this is the first he has heard of this.

My advice will be to write to the DVLA and ask who has appleid for the keeper details and when. Then once you ahve this info you can complain to the ICO about the DVLA handing it out without a reason to do so if there is any mistakes in MET's procedure.

use this info to tell them to foxtrot oscar later. In the meanwhile ignore them completely

The site is a known problem

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

also get your dad to post instead of you so we can get the precise answers to any future questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

This thread seems to have petered out without a definitive answer. The same has just happened to me and I'm not sure what to do. We haven't moved, we've been at the same house for 10 years but we had no notification until this overdue notice.

 

I guess the law has moved on since this thread was started and there are lots of posts about the BP garage at Stansted, so I suspect contacting the manager won't help (judging by the posts they really couldn't care less). Any advice appreciated.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, 

 

I forgot to update the thread. We complained saying we didn't receive it to BP on twitter. After a few emails we got a letter saying they're going reduce the pcn to the initial amount. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you paid?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

email removed we don't allow that tony

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...