Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JP Morgan/Rooftop Arrears fees- The saga continues.


jotty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK MCOL now submitted as advised, for small amount £50, and complaint to ICO.

 

Lets see if the law is on our side this time, just concerned slightly as to any response or defence they may put forward but lets see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post your particulars of claim up here in PDF format.

 

You have another half hour to do it before we set the forum to read-only

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2019 at 2:53 PM, BankFodder said:

Post your particulars of claim up here in PDF format.

 

You have another half hour to do it before we set the forum to read-only

Kept it simple pending a response as advised:-

 

Quote

 

The claimant sent a properly formulated subject access request made pursuant to the Data Protection Act 2018 to the defendant on 12/12/18 & 04/01/19

The defendant failed to comply with their statutory duty to disclose the claimant's personal data within the lawful deadline of 30 days.

The defendant's failure to comply with the statutory request is continuing.

The defendant is in breach of their statutory duty and furthermore has caused distress and inconvenience to the claimant.

The claimant claims damages of £50

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks fine, – you sent to SAR is so you should change it to the plural.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got home today and there was a letter from Rooftop, they acknowledged my court claim and whilst not saying they were wrong have admitted the claim and are now sending out the information as per the original SAR. I will check the MCOL site as well.

Oh and I have also got a Bruce bonus of the £50 and £25 in fees claimed in a nice cheque.

Once I get the cheque cleared and have the SAR I will of course be donating to this wonderful site (Bankfodder)

Next battle will be about the excessive charges on the account that will hopefully show up from the SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well got the response re SAR, they have sent me a cd with the info on but I can’t look at it as I only have iPads. The cd is also password protected and that’s being sent by separate letter. 

Its like dealing with a petulant child ! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that they have admitted the claim???

This means you will apply for judgement?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks in advance for the donation.  Very kind.

We would like very much to have a copy of the judgement and you should send copies to the ICO and FCA as part of a complaint.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have paid the amount claimed so I’m just waiting for a copy from court. 

Not had a response yet from ICO but will be telling them in due course.

Let’s see what they don’t want me to see in the SAR

If they paid the amount claimed in full I guess that means my claim had been satisfied doesn’t it ? 

Edited by jotty
Link to post
Share on other sites

password CD is normal unless you ask for it to be on paper. Most default to paper, but to save ink/paper/environment etc they go on cd

  • Thanks 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you may have to apply for the judgment - I'm not sure that it will be generated automatically

Link to post
Share on other sites

More than a few broken links I'm afraid. I'm sure the site team will have a hunt around – but maybe you could as well please. And then let us know if you find it. It certainly around here somewhere. I suggest that you begin by looking in the mortgages section of the library

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if you find a broken link, please could you post a link to it source so we can see the context of it and then we will have a better chance finding the target.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

More than a few broken links I'm afraid. I'm sure the site team will have a hunt around – but maybe you could as well please. And then let us know if you find it. It certainly around here somewhere. I suggest that you begin by looking in the mortgages section of the library

 

Yes spent last hour trying, annoying thing is i had a copy until recently - aarghh !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well where did you find these broken links. That will gives a place to start

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Well where did you find these broken links. That will gives a place to start

Unless you really want me to spend another hour trying, I have looked in the library and it gives the "sorry there is a problem" message and then I tried most of the threads relating to unfair fees and tend to get the same error message.

 

Sorry, there is a problem

The page you requested does not exist

Error code: 1S160/2

Edited by jotty
Link to post
Share on other sites

No I really don't want to put you to any more trouble – but if you could simply show me where one of these links is – then I may be able to track down the target and then repair the link.

So where are you finding the link? If it's an AutoLink then please would you type the trigger phrase or word in your next post and that will help me to find it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could it be this 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Could it be this 

 

Yes thats one I looked at but the link to the spreadsheet seems to have gone, also tried searching for the CIS spreadsheet but get same message that it doesnt exist.

Edited by jotty
Link to post
Share on other sites

the above is document link which was broken and I've now repaired.

You still aren't showing me where you are finding this broken link.

Please will you link me to the post which contains the link which is broken and then I have a chance of finding it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've flagged it up to the site team

Link to post
Share on other sites

in the PPI forum where they have always been

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...