Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Name of the Claimant ? William chapman   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the  claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 14 May 2019 Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total) -  1st June I think ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claim is for £4000 relating to unpaid charges for energy supplied by the claimant to the defendant, and set out in an invoice date 26 June  2017 full particulars of which have been delivered to the defendant. And the claimant claims any further arrears that may have accrued and become payable since the commencement of these proceedings. And the claimant claims interest on the sum due pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 from the due date to the date of issue at 8.00% per annum being £630 and further interest on a daily basis until the date of judgement or sooner payment at a daily rate of £0.91p. The claimant claims (1) the sum of £4000, (2) interest of £630.00, (3) continuing daily interest at £0.91p.   What is the total value of the claim? £5100   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? I received a letter before action   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? yes, but they were aware of this and have had my address from the day I moved   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Yes Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Probably phone    Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? Only on one of them   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. im not sure   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I’m aware of   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No   Why did you cease payments? We got into financial trouble, for behind, made an agreement to pay, which we did, then they increased the payments a lot and I couldn’t afford the new payments, and then we moved and our supplier changed   What was the date of your last payment? I don’t know   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan sort of yes, as part of our monthly payments, but they broke down shortly before we moved. I can’t honestly remember a great deal about it all as it’s a few years ago and I was regularly in and out of hospital at the time
    • Question guys -   If the alleged loan was applied for online and a "digital signature" was used to complete the application, what then constitutes an original CCA as it won't be like a paper based one that has a 'wet' signature.    As Lowell appear to have a copy of the online application what would they be expected to bring to court and would the document they have be enough for them to win? Or am I missing something in my knowledge on this?   Thanks.
    • couldn't see anything for southwell street that relates to TPS on the planning portal. Have asked them to call me back. Thanks for the info by the way.
    • @fkofilee thanks that’s definitely what I intend to do 😁. I Would just like to know if there is any course of action to stop them from spamming me with letters/emails in the future?   @dx100uk I know you are just trying to help however I think you have misunderstood. I have only dealt with them via post. They replied to me via email which I assume they have from when I signed up for the gym originally, which is why I stated I had yet to receive any further postal communication. I hope that clears up any confusion.
    • Hello i was hoping someone might be able to give me some advice please. It’s a bit complicated, but I’ve ended up with a claim form and I’m terrified.  I moved house two years ago. At my old address I was with npower. I lived there for 3 years. We had some financial issues and we were in arrears with npower, but we also were making some payments to them, as agreed with them. When we moved, I had health issues (problematic pregnancy)  and was in hospital a bit and I don’t straight away try to resolve the npower issues. I heard no more from them u til just over a year ago when I got a letter from William chapman solicitors, it was demanding over £4000 from us for npower. They said they’d sent me an incoming and outgoing letter which I hadn’t received, so they emailed me a copy, I sent it back to them and heard no more from them and didn’t chase them. I then received a letter before action a few weeks ago and I now have a claim form from them, dated 14th May. I don’t dispute that I owe npower some money, but I have no idea how the bill can possibly be as high as they’re saying. Even if I hadn’t paid at all for three years that would still be a high bill, but we did pay, even though I know there were arrears. I don’t know how to proceed at all. I can’t afford to pay them over £5000 which they now have the bill at, and I also can’t afford to get a ccj. I’d like to come up with a payment plan but they didn’t respond last time I sent them one. I’d really appreciate any advice please!  
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 3 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
Lit-Roamer

46: Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearyway)

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I will be grateful if you can please help me if there is something I can do with this notice please.

 

On 23/12 I went to Kensington high street, whilst looking for parking space I saw a sign (attached) and empty space saying No stopping at any time except 7 am - 4 pm, P for 30 minutes. I safely parked my car which was left there for about 15 minutes. I then returned and made way home.

 

I am now in receipt of this notice (attached). I went back there and saw two conflicting signs and wonder if I could successfully challenge it or it was just my sheer stupidity :/

 

Thank you for your help in advance.

20190112_104943904_iOS.jpg

20190110_171929229_iOS.jpg

20190110_171900344_iOS.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you photograph where the signs were positioned in relation to the road markings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The closest where I park had the sign which states (No stopping at any time except 7 am - 4 pm, P for 30 minutes) that is the reason I parked, usually for loading bays also have it written LOADING BAY on road and that place didn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the council pic it looks like you parked between lamp post 035 (which has the P for 30 mins) and the telephone box here:

 

https://goo.gl/maps/9t8jc8PgCmJ2

 

The loading bay sign is further down outside the Hare & Tortoise. This sign is parallel to the carriageway (it should be at right angles to it, so facing on-coming traffic) and so it's perfectly understandable why you didn't see it/ look any further.

 

There should be a clear demarcation where there are two different restrictions between the two.

 

I would make reps before the 21 day deadline and also phone TFL and ask them to send a copy of the video

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...