Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Just after some advice regarding parking on my local road.

 

A business operates on my road, it is generally a quiet road with about 15 terraced houses on each side. During opening hours of the business the customers literally use both sides of the road to park leaving very little space for residents who live on the road to park their cars. It has causes so much traffic on the road and stress to the residents. I have spoken with the council and they have said there is nothing they can do.

 

Does anyone have any experience in dealing with this kind of issue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The council means "nothing they can do under current parking regulations" presumably. Potentially they could, for example introduce a residents only parking scheme on one side of the road. But that might not have the support of all local residents. Residents parking zones can be a pain in the backside if you have visitors or tradesmen in.

 

If you think a residents only parking restriction might help and other residents agree it's probably a political matter that you need to discuss initially with your Ward Councillor. The more people from your street that raise it the more likely the Councillor is to do something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It costs a council tens of thousands to introduce a resident permit scheme so be careful what you wish for as you will have to be the ones to pay for this in the long run.

 

What you need to do is look at other aspects of planning law to see if that can place restrictions upon nay commercial vehicles visiting but will have little effect upon joe public using the street to park.

 

You havent said how it cuases problems for the residents, surely they are away at work duirng the day or is there an overrepresentation of retired people there? Not moving your cars to prevent their customers parking in the first place would have an effect, co-operating with them to resolve this once you have looked but not acted on other solutions would also be productive. if they dont want to be helpful then they are the ones who will suffer when restrictions are brought in.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A residents' parking scheme is the only realistic solution as far as I can see. There's no other way you can have priority on the spaces, and you can't stop people parking there if they are allowed to. Of course you won't have to pay for it yourselves - the costs would come out of the common public purse, but you will have to pay for your annual permits if a scheme is introduced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You will find if you go down the route of Residents Parking Permits depending on where you live you may well have to pay the council every year for the permit, and this can be expensive.

Councils will always use the excuse "there is nothing they can do"

The road outside of your property as long as there are No Parking restrictions of any nature can be used by anybody for parking

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Councils will always use the excuse "there is nothing they can do"

The road outside of your property as long as there are No Parking restrictions of any nature can be used by anybody for parking

FS

 

Aren't you conradicting yourself? As you correctly say, anybody can park there - so how is the council's "there's nothing we can do" an excuse? It's true! If you're entitled to park there, you're entitled to park there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re-Phrase, as long as there are No Parking restrictions of any nature,any body can park including the customers of the business in your street, residents do not have any priority.Should you and the other residents decide to approach the Council to put in place a residents parking scheme, depending on the council in question it can be very expensive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • I was talked into signing up with Future Comms (future-comms.co.uk) who cold-called me to change my mobile contract to them, via 02, rather than EE. I have a small business (only me!) and it's a business contract. True, the 4G network is better for my area. This company seemed to be a marketing set-up for various telecoms companies, so I assumed anything I signed would be with 02 and didn't think it might be a problem.
       
      They sent an email whilst I was on the phone to set up the direct debit mandate with my bank which I signed electronically. That was the first, of many, problems I found. Apparently THAT was my contract, binding me to 3 years and no 'cooling off' period, because I was a 'business' (meaning any consumer rights did not apply). When I subsequently asked in writing for a copy of my contract, that is what they sent - when I argued it was a DD mandate they insisted it was my contract!
       
      2 days later they asked for my phone details to get it unlocked which I sent. 10 days later, EE closed my account, so I changed the SIM card to 02 that had come a few days before. No network! They had done nothing about unlocking it. Fortunately I was lucky with EE who managed to give me the right codes, rather than the usual 10 days to go through Samsung.
       
      By this time I was suspicious of their set-up and wanted to cancel. As I said earlier, I found myself trapped into a 3 year contract with no 14 day cooling off period (they don't offer that). Promises to deal with my complaints never happened, promised return calls neither....and on and on.
       
      Ofcom's rules apply to consumers and small businesses (under 10 employees), yet this shower don't acknowledge that. They just repeat and repeat that I am a business so it doesn't apply. To cancel the contract I have to pay the full 3 year's fees!!
       
      I would like to know if others have had similar experiences? Or does anyone know how I can maybe declare the 'contract' unenforceable? I have never before been locked into something without a clear written contract, with t&c's! And, yes, I have asked, and yes, I have been ignored.
      • 84 replies
    • Future comms!. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415706-future-comms/
      • 10 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
×
×
  • Create New...