Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA claimform - old EGG now BC card debt ***Claim Discontinued***


Steve.H
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1758 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group

 

Date of issue 19/12/2018

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claimant claims the sum of £4793.79 for an outstanding debt owed.

 

2.On 20.01.2005 the defendant entered into a an agreement with Barclays Bank PLC for a credit card under reference …..

 

3.On the 06/05/2011 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £5041.31.

 

4.On 17/08/2015 the debt of £5041.31 was assigned to PRA Group(UK) Ltd. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 law of property act 1925.

Payments of £232.96 were received up to 20/03/20108 and adjustments have been applied in the sum of £14.56.

 

5.AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1. The sum of £4793.79

 

An Egg CC debt £4793.79 + court costs

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?Yes

 

What is the total value of the claim? £5058.79

 

what is the claim for: egg credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? 2005 should I request the CCA I believe they won't have a problem proofing I owe this debt?

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?No it came off about a year ago

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.Debt purchaser PRA

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes sure I did !

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not sure

 

Why did you cease payments? Had a brain injury

 

What was the date of your last payment?19/12/2018

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planlink3.gif? Yes

 

How shall I defend / respond to this

they seem to be using bully tactics and fishing for me to pay up the full amount which I don't have.

 

in March last year they sent me a full and final settlement letter asking for £1680.37

I counter offered £1200

they refused it and said they would only take £1945 which is bizarre.

 

PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT,

I questioned this on another forum and was told the wording is not right and the balance should be zero.

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA Requestlink3.gif to the claimant for a copy of your agreement

(except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts)

 

Will Do !

 

Particulars of Claim

An Egg CC debt £4793.79 + court costs I went into arrears in 2010 after a head injury and have been making monthly payments. Egg was bought by Barclaycard since then and then they assigned/sold the debt to the PRA group 17/08/2015.

 

I have been paying without missing a payment but have not done their constant requests for income and expenditure.

I got a letter November 13th say my account had been transferred to the investigations and litigation department which I ignored.

 

Thanks for your help I don't have long to respond to this claim :(

IMG_20190104_194517.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Request the CCA and CPR from the solicitors.

 

its unlikely theyll get a compliant egg agreement from that far back. Most simply dont exist. Plus the debts are chock full of charges.

 

First, go to mcol and acknowledge the claim, make sure contest jurisdiction is unchecked and click through to the end and exit mcol. This submits your acknowledgement and gives you more time for a defence.

 

The likely reason theyve gone to a claim is because youve blindly paid without question for all this time, and they have you marked as gullible. Put them to proof that they can indeed chase you for this.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

why have you come here SOOO!! late

I hope you have already acknowleged the claim [AOS] on MCOL website

else you might now be TOO LATE, and might already have LOST THE CASE.

you've lost 17 of your 33 days total to file a defence...

 

 

go it done NOW!!

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get that ack done now. Then check to see if its been accepted.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I make it sunday but get it done NOW

get the CCA/CPR away to PRA group tomorrow by recorded.

they'll have a job in getting the signed agreement [unless it was online?]

and the EGG T&C they never get right either.

 

esp as they say its a Barclaycard in their poc!!

they mention nothing about EGG on the court N1 do they?

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and dont tell them it was egg. If they try to come up with a barclaycard agreement, theyve already done the work for you and the claims sunk.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the CPR in the same envelope

pra have inhouse solicitors so no sep address is listed on the N1 form?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 3

 

pra are debt buyers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

I have sent the CCA and CPR via first class signed for which they should receive Monday, I have also acknowledged the claim(AOS) but this has not been approved yet I hope MCOL do this on Monday!

 

But what would my defense be to this claim if they produce the CCA that is?

 

That I was making regular payments under an old agreement and they should not have cancelled it ! Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont jump ahead of yourself just yet. They wont be able to produce the CCA. Why? Because they think its a barclaycard. It isnt. SO theyve already screwed themselves over with it. Of course you dont tell them that. Its also highly unlikely they will even fulfil the CCA request, so the claim will just get stayed.

 

Be aware they may send you letters of their own back saying they have requested judgement, even though the courts timeframe is still in effect. They do this so you dont fill in you side of the claim, and then they WILL go for judgement by default, leaving you with no avenue of counter.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

need to get reading up steve

as far as I can see you've not read one other claimform thread in this forum.

 

although your defence is not due till day 33 [21st by 4pm]

no harm is finding out the stages of a claim and what to expect/do in the 'downtimes' between stages

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

 

Due to a family issue I have not give a defense to this court action and its due tomorrow I requested CCA and PRA have sent a letter 16.01.18 saying they have requested the required information from Barclaycaed.

 

But what would be my defense be in this case, do I dispute the whole claim on the grounds that no CCA has been produced ?

 

Thank You in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

PRA also included a letter from Barclaycard posted to me in Sep 2015 which basically said that my account was closed with BC and transferred to PRA group with an outstanding balance.

 

So they have not produced the original CCA but I am unsure how to defend this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Adapt a similar defence to suit your particulars...plenty of none response to CCA requests in the following....

 

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-Legal-Successes

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...