Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am a private seller and recently sold a pair of trainers on eBay.  Everything seemed fine until just after the eBay 30 day mbg had expired.  The buyer contacted me with photos showing me that both shoes had ripped.  He wanted his money back, and after refusing to refund him, he then left me retaliatory and defamatory feedback on my profile to the effect that I had sold him fake trainers (this was removed by eBay).  He then initiated a chargeback via Paypal.  Invariably, the outcome was in his favour, and I have now been charged for the cost of the trainers.  I would have also been stung for the chargeback fee, but eBay refunded this.  Incidentally, I do have the email receipt of the trainers from when I bought them from a well-established and bona fide online retailer.  The susbequent conversation with eBay followed its predictable course, i.e. the chargeback is out of their hands etc. I have been in contact with citizens advice, and my bank.  Citizens advice told me that as a private seller I'm responsible for the "Title and description" of the goods, but not the performance, or the fitness for purpose.  To me it is clear; if you receive something that's not as described, you don't then use the goods, and more than 30 days later claim 'not as described'.  In my mind, this makes the claim fraudulent.  He's used the 'they're fake' card to give credence to a 'not as described' claim here, obviously, without any evidence.  My understanding is that the chargeback is unlawful, because the trainers were shipped as described.  However, I read something on an eBay forum regarding sellers having no statutory rights, i.e. no right to appeal against a chargeback decision, or to complain to the financial ombudsman.  Does this mean that if my bank disputes the charge on my behalf, it will be to no avail, even if it's recognisably a fraudulent chargeback?  I have reported it via the Actionfraud website. Any advice, anyone?  Would be most grateful!
    • Thank you, I have drafted my letters and started to complete the reply form, printed from this site and not using the one they provided.    2 questions, on the forum link it says to tick box D & I, the reason for box D will be given on my thread, what would my answer be to "I dispute the debt"?  Do I send anything for the Vodafone debt they have included?  I've only done 118 loan s. 77 & capital one credit cards so. 78    Thank you  
    • It'll be something to the effect of:  "I am in receipt of your letter before claim.  I was awaiting a passenger as a licensed cab driver on the Locton estate who subsequently cancelled the pickup after me waiting a while and will fight this in the small claims court if necessary. Plus I have friends who are experts in contractual law and make it their business to defeat these spurious PPC claims.  So issue the claim form or go forth and multiply, up to you"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1936 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm unsure where to post this,

 

I added FLP to my home insurance

 

I needed to call on this policy therefor, sought legal advice through my home insurance policy.

 

The policy referred me to a company (outsourced but covered under the policy)

Initial merit test concluded I had over 50% for a successful ET claim, a solicitor was appointed,

whilst the solicitor was compiling an ET1claim form,

I was advised to contact ACAS to obtain ET certificates,

unfortunately,

ACAS helpline failed to advise me correctly,

this resulted in me completing an ET1 claim form in error.

 

Realising my mistake,

I rectified my error with ACAS &the ET service on the same day.

 

Several days later, my appointed solicitor issued the ET1 claim they were in the process of compiling.

 

2 weeks after rectifying my error,

I received a “withdrawn” certificate from the ET service claiming I had withdrawn my claim;

I forwarded this onto my appointed solicitor for clarification.

 

Turned out,

the initial form I completed was an ET1 claim,

I was unaware at the time,

following me informing the ET service I made an error,

the ET service read this that I’d withdrawn my claim.

 

Under rule 51 & rule 52 ET,

you cannot submit an ET1,

withdraw,

and then resubmit another ET1

 

The company my solicitor represents decided to cancel my FLP cover,

citing I mislead them by not disclosing I made an ET1 claim,

at the timeI filed the form out (ET1) I was under tremendous pressure,

and under GP treatment due to the issues that instigated my ET claim.

 

I explained numerous times to my legal appointees my error was based on the advice I followed from ACAS helpline,

 

My legal appointees refused to budge,

despite all the evidence (emails, telephone calls to ACAS / ET and my deteriorating health) my FLP was cancelled.

 

I sought alternative legal advice, currently; I’m £7000 out of pocket.

 

I went through my legal representatives complaints procedure,

my formal complaint wasn’t upheld, again,

citing I mislead them bynot disclosing the initial error I made, thus, chances of successful outcomehad dropped below 50%.

 

Based on the actions of my legal representatives, I registered a complaint with the legal ombudsman (including official documentationof the appeal hearing)

The legal ombudsman service does not uphold my complaint, agreeing with the legal company,

i.e. I should’ve informed my legal representatives of my initial error, allowing them an opportunity to rectify it, in hindsight, I believed I’d rectified it.

 

As my initial error was rectified the same day, I didn’tthink it was as important in comparison to all the other issues I was experiencing.

 

As a footnote, I had to appeal against the decision made inrelation to the “withdrawal” certificate, that hearing went without issue, the respondents and the ET judge accepted, I made a genuine error, my appeal was upheld,allowing my ET claim to proceed.

 

I genuinely made an error, accepted by the judicial system, albeit at appeal.

 

Whilst I accept the decision of the legal ombudsman’s service,

given my initial legal representatives were fully aware of my medical condition and anxious state at the time I made the error,

I believe, morally, mycomplaint to the legal ombudsman should’ve been upheld.

 

The question is,

as the legal ombudsman has failed to uphold my complaint,

is it worth me issuing a complaint to the insurance ombudsman?

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I'm unsure where to take if, if anywhere, the fact I've had an insurance policy now cancelled, may create difficulties when obtaining future insurance, albeit, at no stage did I intentionally mean to mislead, which is what the company claim I did.

 

Go to the FOS to complain that you were unfairly treated by the legal expenses Insurers. Explain everything that happened as above.

 

The cancellation is not something that will cause you a problem and you need not mention this each time you take out Insurance. These FLP policies are mostly fixed priced add ons to Home Insurances. The reason for cancellation is not saying you did anything dishonest, but your actions in not telling them about the error straightaway, did not allow them to be confident to act for you. I think they were probably wrong in cancelling, based on what you have said.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you uncle,

 

Just one question, in the event my complaint to the FOS is upheld (and that's a big if) any idea what sanction the FOS can impose / award?

 

Am I likely to get back (currently) £7000 I've already paid out?

 

That would have to be worked out and I am not sure what the basis would be. They might not tell the Insurers to pay you the full £7k, but an amount that is calculated after looking at what they think is reasonable to cover, based on the policy terms.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...