Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abbey Life - Past Business Review Annuity Questionnaire


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1494 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just joined the Community here for your thoughts and we thank you in anticipation of any help you may give. We had a questionnaire from Abbey Life regarding enhanced annuity.

 

They state on the bottom of the letter with the enclosed questionnaire -

 

'Abbey Life did not offer enhanced annuities, but one may have been available to you from another provider if you were eligible, and therefore you may be due compensation.'

 

So we wrote to them saying we consider we may have been entitled to an enhanced annuity via an Independent Financial Adviser. (They do say this questionnaire is in relation to the purchase of your Abbey Life - Joint Annuity.)

 

They have now phoned because of the letter and we have arranged to talk to them Friday afternoon.

 

1. My husband had a Waiver of Contributions implemented as a result of an accident before he reached retirement age. He does not get a huge amount because he only took out what we could afford at the time . We had hoped to increase it over time, because his employer did not offer one, even so we were pleased we did a Waiver of contributions option.

 

Note: He went onto have a TIA and now has a pacemaker. I also went onto have breast cancer in 2007.

 

2. Looking at the questionnaire in our mind it was not relevant - we thought he was committed to Abbey Life. In fact it starts off with 'Why did you contact Abbey Life ......'

 

So our question is -

 

(a) this person from Abbey Life is saying he could help us over the phone to complete the questionnaire. But we are wondering if we should be seeking independent advice now?

(b) being my husband was already on 'Waiver of Contributions' then is he in a different category?

 

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Abbey Life Final Attempt 1 of 4.jpg

 

OK - I hope this helps you to help me. This is the questionnaire sent to complete. Page no 5 I have not included it is a Privacy Policy Statement.

 

So to summarize. If already on Waiver of Contributions due to accident so is this Questionnaire relevant i.e. Reading through Section 1.

headed your reasons for contacting Abbey Life.

 

Which we didn't - so something like point G - to ask about your retirement options. Never entered our heads felt we only were with Abbey Life.

Abbey Life Final Attempt 2 of 4.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the scans, Gilly.

 

It sounds as if they're worried about possible mis-selling if your husband could have had a better annuity rate with someone else.

 

I haven't had a lot to do with mis-selling cases, but I can't see any harm in letting them help you with the form. I would though write what they suggest on the form that you have rather than letting them fill in their own version. That way you can review it afterwards and make sure you're happy with the answers. It does sound a generic form so maybe not all of the questions fit your circumstances.

 

In terms of taking independent advice, that's likely to cost you money unless Abbey are offering to pay for it. I don't know if the government's Money Advice Service do anything like that.

 

How long ago was the annuity taken with Abbey Life and do you have paperwork dating back to that time? If not, I would think Abbey ought to provide it.

 

I expect you'll have other views, but in your situation I would try having the phone call as long as you don't feel they're leading you. Is it with a member of staff of Abbey Life? I believe they're part of Lloyds Bank now.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for helping HB - yes - I was worried about them filling in the form their end

 

The annuity was purchased in March 2009. My husband had his accident in 1989 and since then was on a Waiver of Contributions - hence Abbey Life continued to contribute themselves.

 

We had forms we had to complete as to how we wanted to take the Annuity BUT never even knew we could go elsewhere for an 'enhanced annuity'.

 

In their letter with the questionnaire they state and i quote -

 

'Enhanced annuities work on the basis that, if a customer has a medical condition or lifestyle factor (such as smoking or overweight) they will probably live for a shorter time than someone in a better state of health. Firms expect to pay these customers retirement income for less time so typically provide them with a higher income. Abbey Life did not offer enhanced annuities, but one may have been available to you from another provider if you were eligible, and therefore you may be due compensation.'

 

So .... they themselves did the underline. Naturally if my husband would have been a candidate especially as he had already given medical information to qualify for Waiver of Contributions. (after the accident he also then had to have a pacemaker fitted as he had a TIA.)

 

So it is the Waiver of Contributions element that I wonder if this is a factor in this possible claim for compensation if it is appropriate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure the waiver part is a factor. Maybe what's more relevant is the amount of the fund that your husband had available to buy an annuity with in 2009. The fact that he had the foresight to use the waiver option to protect himself shouldn't count against him in my opinion.

 

Edit: so Abbey didn't offer you any advice in 2009?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try and find paperwork with the fund value. (Which I can't remember was much but will see what I can find) Abbey Life never advised that he could get a i.e. second opinion it was just options how we 'used' the funds for the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have found this - dated 16 January 2009 -

 

Current Retirement Fund Value = £27,087.95

 

It said this figure could provide and listed a,b,c,d and e choices. We opted for nearly 7k in cash as we were finding it difficult with husbands accident and a reduced pension. Some later paperwork said -

 

'The premium for this contract is £20856.49 which will provide the following: Initial Gross Annuity - £1,277.70 per annum.

 

Conclusion: Where we are at this point in time and receiving this letter with questionnaire could this 'small amount of fund value' been 'enhanced' we wonder?

 

Thanking you in anticipation of your thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

As I read it, Abbey didn't offer Impaired Life annuities at the time but possibly they think they should have suggested you look around in 2009. I would say at this time they should be doing the thinking, just get the information you need to fill in the form and send it back when you're ready. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you - so I thought tomorrow the questions will be -

 

1. The name of the person we are speaking to and the company he represents.

2. Any advice he gives on completing the form - but - we do it and submit.

3. Ask exactly where do we make it quite plain on the form that we were not offered any advice that we 'look around' for enhanced annuity from another provider.

 

Final Note: Ref: Section 2 of the form -

 

B - It states you might be eligible for an enhanced annuity if you had certain health conditions or lifestyle factors ( e.g. smoking or being overweight)

 

Our question here is - this questionnaire makes that statement BUT they admit they did not offer it? So knowing my husbands health was not good at the time how do we answer that section when it starts with Section 2 - What was discussed on the call(s)

 

© What about my health in 2007 - I had breast cancer and treatment continued for nearly 2 years. Does that play a factor in this?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

In addition to asking the person's details I would also ask what their job is. It could be something like compliance. Who is the letter from?

 

I would be inclined to lead the conversation if you can, mark the questions you don't know the answers to and try to just talk about those.

 

Your point B. I think their concern is that your husband possibly had health issues that would have qualified him for an 'impaired life' annuity but not with them. If that is the case, he could have taken his fund and bought an annuity somewhere.

 

If it was your husband's pension then this is about his health.

 

I hope that helps,

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you - very useful. I have forwarded the article to myself so I can print it out. Will try and read through and understand tomorrow morning it might go in our head a little better.

 

(Only thought about my health when I looked at the question - your spouses health.)

 

OH! I would guess half this battle is their own statement saying they didn't offer enhanced annuity - so if they advised us to go elsewhere they need to prove it surely?

 

(That is why I didn't like the questionnaire e.g. on Section 1 - 9 (G) To ask for help about retirement options (e.g. a discussion about how a feature would meet individual circumstances)

 

So I feel they could imply that going elsewhere may have been mentioned -hence - it gets them out of any compensation claims. Might be wrong but all your help gives us food for thought on how to tackle this.

Edited by Primrose13
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning - well he was trying to be helpful with the form. He was from Abbey Life and we have his name.

 

On Section 1 - he said at (j) we can 'Yes' on lines below put Abbey Life Retirement options. (Will discuss details of forms below)

 

On Section 2 - We were saying we could did not have any calls. He said I can't tell you what was said - but on record - there are calls recorded as having taken place. So he said say if it is how we feel then say 'No' to the questions.

 

Ref: Section 2 - I said on here it mentions Spouse - so would I have been telling them that I had an aggressive form of breast cancer in 2007 with treatment continuing for nearly 2 years, etc. (If they had asked.) He said it is a joint Life Annuity.

 

This morning it is making me concerned that we do not answer correctly because i.e. I did say as far as we can remember no phone calls between us. He said I don't know what the calls were but there is on record you have phone conversations.

 

I think if there were I would have been asking about how the options would affect us. For example either (a) to - (e)

 

All I know is we are sure telling us we could go elsewhere never came into it. Especially given with my cancer then at that time I never knew if I would survive - so surely that would have stuck in our head we could get an enhanced annuity if we shopped around.

 

So Section 2 -

 

(a) We can tick - Yes

(b) Guess tick yes - because we made a choice

© Yes

(d) NO

(e) NO

(f) NO

(g) NO

(h) Yes - then we write something like e.g.

 

'Given the information we were given we did our best to choose an option open to us and we felt committed to Abbey Life.

 

It is only having this questionnaire in front of us and seeing Section 2 that we realize that my wife's health also needed to be taken into consideration'.

 

Phew! This worried me last night and I said to my husband surely they can't take away what they have been paying us now. He said we haven't done anything wrong and would have carried on as we are if they hadn't sent out this Questionnaire.

 

Thank you for being such a support.

Edited by Primrose13
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for letting us know. So you didn't feel under pressure over the phone yesterday? And are you sending the written form back to them now?

 

I would take time and make sure you're happy with the answers. I'm surprised they won't tell you about the phone calls at the time and also surprised that there was no written confirmation afterwards.

 

I don't think they can take back what they've paid you, don't worry about that.

 

Keep going. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you - whilst I was in the shower - where I do a lot of thinking!! I thought if in any of those phone calls they asked about my husband's continued health issues and my health (I would have said 2007 breast cancer).

 

So if they said we do not offer enhanced annuities but you may qualify so we suggest you look around then - we would have - because it is human nature to want more.

 

Yes - he didn't make us feel pressured and said anymore questions give a call. I could on Monday ask him to find out what those calls were before sending in the form maybe?

 

I will over the weekend see if I can find anymore correspondence from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have found some correspondence from the solicitor and letter from Abbey Life confirming Waiver of Contributions.

 

I am just wondering if there is anything to gain from finding out what the calls were about?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...