Jump to content


Britania/BW claimform ANPR PCN - Chelmsford, Essex, Army and Navy Car park CM2 7PU


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning All,

 

I wonder if you could offer me some help please.

 

As vehicle's registered keeper, I've received a letter of claim from BW Legal and understand from reading previous posts that this does need to be responded to.

I've ignored all previous correspondence from Brittania, DRP and Zenith because my understanding was that the NTK needed to arrives by the 15th day following the alleged contravention (it actually arrived on the 24th day!)

 

i have kept copies of all previous correspondence sent.

 

Any advice on how to respond to them would be really appreciated.

 

1 Date of the infringement 5th April 2016

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 27th April 2016

 

3 Date received 29th April 2016

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] NO

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? YES registration details with small date/ time stamp at top of image

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal] No

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

 

7 Who is the parking company Brittania

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Chelmsford, Essex, Army and Navy Car park CM2 7PU

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA

 

Thanks, Jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

A simple but rude letter should be sent so somehting on the line of

" dear sirs, I am in receipt of your threatagram dated the xxth of dec and have laughed at its contents. As I was not the driver at the tiem and the original NTK arrived 10 days too late to create a keeper liability I ask that you tell your clients they can **** off and stop wasting my time. If they know who was driving at the time then you should be bothering them instead. Could you also remind them that thye are in breach of the KADOE contract with the DVLA and are thus breaching the GDPR and I am entitled to seek remedy for the misuse of my personal data. That will happen if they are dumb enough to employ the parking world's second worst solicitors to try their luck in court so tell them I dont expect to hear anything further".

 

Now that might not be the end of the matter so if you cna get soem pictures of the sigange at the place your car was parked including the actual entarnce to the land from the public highway whetehr there are signs or not that would be helpful. When a parking co gets one thing wrong they usually get others wrong as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this anpr or windscreen ticket?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick question, as I'm about to send the letter off to BW Legal, shall i sign it ( i've read on a few posts the suggestion that you just print your name) and would you also send a copy to Brittania Parking as well?

 

Thanks for the great advice you give here, it's really appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about the signature, wait for the experts to pop on.

 

Certainly send a copy to Britannia Parking - unscrupulous solicitors love to rip off not only the motorist but also their own clients by egging them on to court even when they'll lose.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no just type your name

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the reasons for not signing any documents going to these lowlife bandits is that they are not above scanning and manipulating it onto other documents. Yes they are that bad.:-x

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I sent letters off as per post 3 to both Brittania and Law firm (loose definition i know!) and received a response from BW legal citing Combined Parking Solutions V AJH Films and from Brittania saying they are not in breach of Kadoe as they have not implied keeper liability on the original PCN and are relying on the implied contract with the driver prior to PFA 2012, which means they have until the 35th day to provide notice of this.

 

I have now received a County Court Form to complete.

 

I am now a bit confused on how to respond.

 

A couple of questions, I have photograph taken from the site 4 months after alleged contravention (Aug 16) showing signage detailing that a parking charge of £70 may be charged, whereas the original PCN / NTK says an £85 charge is due, is this an example of them unilaterally moving the gate posts again?

 

Any further advise would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks Jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant BRITTANIA PARKING

claimants Solicitors: BW LEGAL

 

Date of issue – 13TH FEB 2019

 

Date to acknowledge) = 3RD MARCH

 

date to submit defence = 15TH MARCH

 

 

What is the claim for

 

1.THE CLAIMANTS CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £85.00 BEING MONIES DUE FROM THE CLAIMANT IN RESPECT OF A PCN ISSUED 05/04/2016 AT 2124 AT CHELMSFORD ARMY AND NAVY ANPR. THE PCN RELATES TO vehicle details included.

 

2.THE TERMS OF THE PCN ALLOWED THE DEFENDANT 28 DAYS FROM THE ISSUE DATE TO PAY THE PCN BUT THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO DO SO.

 

3.DESPITE DEMAND HAVING BEEN MADE THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO SETTLE THEIR LIABILITY.

 

THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUTORY INTEREST PURSUANT TO SECTION 69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM A DAILY RATE OF 0.02 FROM 5/4/16 TO 12/02/19 BEING A TOTAL AMOUNT OF £20.88.

THE CLAIMANT ALSO CLAIMS £60.00 CONTRACTUAL COSTS PURSUANT TO PCN TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

 

What is the value of the claim? £240.88

 

Has the claim been issued by the Private parking Company or was the PCN assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ? PRIVATE PARKING COMPANY

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NO

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

 

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]

.https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31-14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim)(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court case they refer to is a commercial vehicle so not applicable law and they know it.

 

the change of signs may be because they have been told what maximum to charge by the landowner or it may be a new company has taken over the site. Doesnt change anything for you UNLESS you can show LL had instructed them beforehand to alter things

As for the contractual costs that only applies to the DRIVER and not the keeper so it looks as though they are not claiming any keeper liability via the POFA ( and hence the AJH Films twaddle). this menas that part of the claim is easy to knock back and they do themselves no good by saying it is part of the terms that were only notified to you via the PCN so not a contractual condition as far as the originasl contract goes. as we know it is just a made up unicorn food tax it is easy to see why they arent that clear on the true terms as they really want you to pay up without the matter going to court because they cnat make any money if it gets that far, even if they win as they will just about cover their costs and will have wasted a lot of money and time getting that far.

 

so what you need to do for now is acknowledge the claim within a fortnight of its issue and then you ahve another fortnight to put an outline of your defence in. you should also sned a CPR 31.14 request for documents to BWL to ask for sight of the contract between the landowner and Britannia that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and to make civil claims in their own name. Also ask for a copy of the original Notice to Driver ( as they refer to it for their £60 add-on), the Notice to Keeper and for proof of the planning permission granted that allows the siting of their signs and equipment. Give them 14 days to comply.

 

they wont do this so after that time has expired you can use that in your defence and say you dont believe they have the authority as they failed to produce it. this is one of the reasons you need to ack the service of the claim and get the CPR letter out now so you have time to include the rubbishing of them in your defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 15 details what to do

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you know, there is no keeper liability and they dont claim to create one so that menas they should state why they are suing you as they dont say in what capacity.

Not at all surprising as BWL are the parking worlds second worst solicitors and tend to copy the shoddy output of the worst ones. now that will be enough to beat their claim if the judge is in a bad mood but best use other points as well but do use this adn try to get a CMO that forces them to say why they are going after you and also answer the questions about their rights to use the civil procedures in the first place ( hence the CPR 31.14 request) many cases crumble because they cnat show they ahve authority and would rather drop a claim than ahve it shown in court they are just crooks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...