Cpm/BW windscreen pcns - BW PAP LOC Now Claimform - (residential car park) The citrus Building, Maderia road, Bournemouth ***Claim Dismissed with Costs** now another PAPLOC for another same place ticket

[dx100uk]

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket

 

for the one you have the LOC for please

 

and scan up the NTK and your appeal.

 

they cant overrule supremacy of contract you have either.

 

theres a snotty letter in a thread here today you can send BW

just look in the threads below yours

[dx100uk]

I've merged the threads

better to keep them all under one.

 

you don't need to appeal anything.

 

just send the BW legal letter by ROYAL MAIL.

 

let the rest run.

 

a lease company should not be blindly paying a speculative invoice

it not in the contract you signed up too.

 

dx

 

 

dx

[dx100uk]

send who?

[dx100uk]

if you copy and paste from the forum the black links add ICON to each of them

 

as for all the tickets.

are they for the same car in the same car park as the one with the PAP letter of claim?

if so why involve the lease company when the PAP etc all came straight to you?

[dx100uk]

that's as clear as mud...

 

so you have 2 cars...[obv I know as your threads are about this 'double parking' residential spaces]

 

2 of the tickets - 1 being subject to a letter of claim - relate to a vehicle you are the registered keeper too

and the other 2 tickets relate to your other car - with is a lease car?

 

just confirm the above for the minute please...

[dx100uk]

well 4/5 are a load of twaddle they cant enforce!!

[dx100uk]

simon renshaw smith.

 

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=simon+renshaw+smith&sa=Search+CAG

[dx100uk]

Never use Email!!

[dx100uk]

or not at all

there nothing that says they must.

[dx100uk]

yes they are they have a CCL

its address checking 

[dx100uk]

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

[dx100uk]

no follow the guide

[dx100uk]

please do not post our templates in the open forum

we know what they look like

there is no need to adapt it send as is

[dx100uk]

as everyone else does..

 

[dx100uk]

not due till 27th so no harm in preparing.

 

 

[dx100uk]

well make sure you log every call.

hope yo recorded that call?

don't be hoodwinked either.

into thinking they wont push it right thru till the day before the hearing to run up costs that they supposedly will claim in barrister fees.

to make you wet yourself and crumble.

 

 

 

[dx100uk]

not due till 27th

[dx100uk]

But they will have to produce it regardless to you requesting or not if the claim progresses to the disclosure stage

 

so dont sweat about that

[dx100uk]

mcol ended at allocation to CC.

begging letter.

 

ring the day after the fee is due

[dx100uk]

no read the letter that came from the court acking the receipt of your defence

 

dx

[dx100uk]

do the n180

makes no odds 

 

await the n157

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

might do go check Mcol

if not ring northants bulk and ask.

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

whats their court hearing fee paying date?

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

wheres the letter that tells you WS must be in by 3rd?

usually its 14 days before the court hearing?

[dx100uk]

On 29/08/2019 at 22:59, harni said:

1.The claimants claim is for the sum of £667.19 being monies due from the Defendant to the Claimant in respect of Parking charge notices (PCN) for parking contraventions which occurred between and on private land managed and operated by the claimant, where the defendant was responsible for a vehicle registration mark, seen breaching the terms and conditions in operation at the car park/private land.

 

2.The defendant was allowed 28 days from the PCN issue date to pay each PCN but failed to do so.

Despite demand having been made, the defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability. 

 

3.The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of 0.11 from 20/12/2018 to 27/08/2019 being an amount of £27.19. The claimant also claims £ contractual costs as set out in the terms and conditions. 

 

1. the claimant has failed to show a cause for action as they have not shown they have a right to enter into contracts with the public nor to make claims in their own name. The defendant does not believe they have locus standi in this matter.

 

2  In any case there was no breach of the contract offered by the defendant.

 

3 the claimant offered individual terms that override the signage at the site so the terms in that contract were adhered to and thus no cause for action by way of a breach of contract

done above SR.

 

dx