Jump to content


harni

Cpm windscreen pcns - BW PAP LOC Now Claimform - (residential car park) The citrus Building, Maderia road, Bournemouth

Recommended Posts

Absolutely nothing.

The only thing I’ve had is the claim form with the above POC.

No description of the actual claim, doesn’t even say where this all happened!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, they haven't said how many tickets but they have added interest.

 

3.The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of 0.11 from 20/12/2018 to 27/08/2019 being an amount of £27.19. The claimant also claims £ contractual costs as set out in the terms and conditions. 

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see, I was under the impression that would have been under their legal costs. That makes sense. I still have no idea of which charges this related to unfortunately 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

£667.19 - 27.19 = £640

 

£640 / 160 = 4

 

I wonder if they haven't included legal costs.

 

Someone like dx will tell you how to acknowledge the claim online, I expect he'll mention CPR then.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Answer  the questions on here:

 

then acknowledge Online on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

everything is in post 99 already


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help so far guys,

 

Right, i have registered on the money claim website and acknowledged that i intend to defend in full. 

 

Tomorrow i will start typing up the CPR and get that posted off to BW Legal Monday morning.

 

It does say that the claimant is Countrywide parking however the address for sending documents and payments is BW legal.

 

Do i need to send a copy to Countrywide as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no follow the guide


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they have added unicorn food tax with added chutzpah to reach a figure of more than £600 so if you dotn defend they can send the bailiffs round to seize your vehicle.

 

You will bhe challenging this but only when you put in your defence. You can touch on it in your outline defence to be submitted soon but will really lay into it in the full defence that will be much later

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please do not post our templates in the open forum

we know what they look like

there is no need to adapt it send as is


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noted with copying the template over, apologies. The letter has now been sent off to them and i am writing the defence. Am i ok to post that up for criticism?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as everyone else does..

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. It is admitted that Defendant is the hirer of the vehicle(s)
in question.

2. It is denied that the Defendant has breached any of the terms
and conditions as set out by the claimant on their signage.

3. The Claimant has noted on the parking charge notices attached
to the vehicle that the reason for enforcement was due to double
parking. Not only is this missing as a prohibited action from the
terms and conditions set out by the Claimant, the Claimant has
issued letters to each resident of the site stating that double
parking is allowed in the under croft spaces.

4. It is denied that the Claimant entered into a contract with the
Defendant. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control
Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract
requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted
by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is
not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its
own account, as the carpark is owned by and the terms of entry set
by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has
authority to bring this claim. The proper Claimant is the
landowner.

5. The Claimant, by their own admission during an appeal against
one of the parking charges in question, are not contracted by the
landowner to cover the parking space in question.

6. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is
denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any
relief at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not all of it.

Some of it was a template which I believe to be relevant

(however if I’m incorrect then I’d really appreciate some advice on where I’ve gone wrong)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not due till 27th so no harm in preparing.

 

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the idea.

Whilst I’m confident that they won’t be stupid enough to actually take this to court, and even if they do, will lose, I still want to make sure I have all my ducks in a row

 

on a side note, when does the phone calls become harassment?

BW are calling me daily, sometimes several times a day.

 

I did answer to them once when they asked what my intentions were which was made perfectly clear to be told

“we will keep calling you regardless”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well make sure you log every call.

hope yo recorded that call?

don't be hoodwinked either.

into thinking they wont push it right thru till the day before the hearing to run up costs that they supposedly will claim in barrister fees.

to make you wet yourself and crumble.

 

 

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn’t recorded as to be honest, I was caught a little off guard however they are calling on a daily basis so I’ll make a point of recording the next one!

 

there won’t be any crumbling here.

I’ve just been reading through the history of this to jog my memory on some of the events and it’s reminded me just how pathetic they are as a business. I fully intend to waste as much of their time and hopefully money as possible. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let them spout and don't tell them that you have recorded the call until its nearly ended and you have said you are logging date and time of all calls as they are in breach of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997

 

 Prohibition of harassment.

(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—

(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

[F1(1A)A person must not pursue a course of conduct —

(a)which involves harassment of two or more persons, and

(b)which he knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons, and

(c)by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above)—

(i)not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or

(ii)to do something that he is not under any obligation to do.]

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect, will make sure to do this next time they call although surprisingly they haven’t today (yet)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when they call you could just put the phione down next to you and carry on with somehting else until they get fed up. Placing it near to the radio is always a good one.

 

However, if you wish to challenge them over their calls make sure you can record the conversation.

Anothet taccitc is to pretend you have a long list of questions to ask them and then ask them completely random things about their clients like what size shoes do they wear as you are not convinced that they have fulfilled the identification procedures as required for solicitors under the money laundering regs and will they be furnishing proof of that before they attend court as you would hate to think that they turn up and then find out that their clients aren't really the directors of a parking co but pranksters who have just copied their details and created a fake entity just to make fools of people and you would hate them to be wasting their time as a result of such a jape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received BW Legals response to my CPR Letter, about 40 pages of reprints of the various letters that have been sent to me over the past 10 months. Again their evidence here only supports my arguments that their terms and conditions do not deny residents the ability to double park in spaces where possible which is what the tickets were issued for. 

 

I am yet yet to submit my defence. Would now be the time to do so or do I wait until the last moment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they send you a copy of the management agreement with the landowner?

 

What date do you need to submit your defence by? Don't do it just yet if you've still got time. I think it may benefit from a little refinement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not due till 27th


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...