Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We have spoken to DVLA and been told to write a letter with the details. Even though there is no address available it will be on record that she is no longer the keeper and that will be backdated to the time of sale.   I'm sorry I haven't addressed your questions. It's a Mini 07 registration 70,000 miles, service history, well maintained, bodywork perfect, 2 former owners MOT  December and recently serviced. Price £1900. As far as we are aware there were no other issues apart from the small oil leak - they are claiming there is oil all over their drive but there has never been any oil on our drive. (My daughter did suggest that they might not have screwed the oil cap on properly). In fact a local garage looked at it the day before the sale and their description of the leak was 'slightly damp'. It was advertised on Gumtree and Facebook Marketplace. The advertised price was £2250. There was no smell of burning oil when they test drove, nor had there been any such smell or fumes.
    • To answer the question, no, unless they do it illegally. 
    • the differences between brexiter bull-fantasy and Remain Reality begins to bite   add in: Just a year ago she was saying in the express that Brexit would stop the EU 'stealing' our stocks 'on OUR terms', without mentioning:   * the vast majority of our catches are sold to the EU (which she should know as a fish auctioneer profiting from others work) * the effects tariffs would have * The vast majority of the fish we eat is imported * The United Nations stocks agreement * The migratory nature of the fish (sic) * Irish and Scot fishing/territorial waters if they become independent   and of course she's out of one of her income streams LOL .. but I assume her fish auction company can still auction UK catches to the EU without change ... for now   You can understand how terms like 'mummery' came into use can't you?
    • Thank you for your responses. In terms of the vehicle, it is a 2010 volkswagen crafter which I purchased for £2500. It has 160,000 miles on the clock. But for its last MOT had 260,000 miles on the clock.  The reason I didnt check these bits and Bob's is due to the fact I have only bought new previous to this and being young I guess I was naive and trusting to a certain extent or should we say inexperienced in used vehicles.   He has several Van's listed and several more at his address also. I have his address yes, I'm unsure on ownership of said property.   I have pictures of all conversations between ourselves, I also now have written confirmation from a garage in regards to the forged service history I am awaiting a call off 2 others as I type this. I am now losing an extreme amount of money per day due to not being able to work or get the money back and this is seriously affecting my health already.   Apologies if i have missed anything out there I've tried to answer as best I can.
    • Have you been in contact with the Council's Housing and Homeless Team? Also have you had a proper benefit assessment.
  • Our picks

Hair Bear

Car prang

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 337 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My wife confessed to me today that she had been in prang last Thursday, and now our insurance company have emailed saying: “We’ve been told that your vehicle was involved in an incident on 13 December 2018. At the moment we have the following information about the incident: Location Description: xxxxx. Your Vehicle: xxxx. We have tried to call you to clarify these allegations but we have been unable to reach you. We need you to call us on xxxxx. It is important that we speak to you urgently. If we don’t hear from you within the next 5 days and the information provided to us by the third party suggests the involvement of your vehicle, we will accept responsibility for the incident and settle any third party claim.”

 

She says they both stopped and checked their cars. His door was caved in but she had no damaged, and since he admitted it was his fault, she went on her way. Whilst she is sticking to her story, I have the tiniest nagging doubt, because we have been arguing a lot over our lack of money and I wonder if she’s defending from the huge cash impact of going from 20 years no claims bonus to zero. I therefore wonder if it was more 50-50, or indeed her fault completely, and she just drove off hoping he wouldn’t have time to take our registration number.

 

Questions:

If we contact the insurance company to say ‘yes, she was involved, but it was the other guy’s fault’, what happens next – do they just decide it’s his word against hers and leave it at that, or is there a massive instigation?

 

Suppose there is cctv that goes in his favour, does that mean she will be fined by the courts if her story is wildly different?

 

If the case goes in his favour, which is cheapest/best method of paying for his damage: taking out a loan or doing it through the insurance and losing your no claims (if indeed you are allowed to choose?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gather the police were not involved so there is no question of any criminal proceedings and no question of any fine.

 

You certainly should contact your insurer immediately and give them a full report.

 

I suppose that the admission made by the other driver that it was his fault was simply made verbally and I suppose that there are no witnesses. You had better settle in for problems.

 

If you really did drive off without exchanging details then frankly it doesn't look very good for her – regardless of who was really at fault.

 

The best thing in these situations is to play exactly by the book – although it's a bit late to say it now.

 

Anyway you better do what you can to retrieve the situation by being completely straight dealing and filing the report.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Motoring Insurance Forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure it is your insurance company contacting you and not a claims company wanting to make a quick buck? To make sure phone your insurance company using the number on the original literature you got when you took out the insurance and not the number on the recent letter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you sure it is your insurance company contacting you and not a claims company wanting to make a quick buck? To make sure phone your insurance company using the number on the original literature you got when you took out the insurance and not the number on the recent letter.

 

It is definitely our insurance company.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also, did she not stop and exchange details? failure to do so is a criminal offence and may be enough of an excuse for your insurer to decide not to pay out leaving you to foot the bill.

 

You may find that getting insurance when renewal time comes along will be very difficult even if they play along with this claim. You need to clarify this and then speak to your insurer and if her version of events is true then there will be nothing to worry about on that front as his admission may be enough to mean that no further action was needed at the time.

 

Now it is clear that he has contacted his insurer but that is not the same as denying sole liability, his insurer will want to avoid paying up whatever the circumstances so will need statements and a damage report from your side

Edited by honeybee13
Paras

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding this same incident, today we received a letter from the police saying the wife is alleged to have committed the following: Driving without due care and attention, Failing to stop, and failing to report a collision.

Questions:

1) I've read somewhere that they should have sent this with 14 days of the prang, is this true?

2) If this goes to court can you ask them to change the given date if it coincides with a holiday you have already paid for?

3) What sort of points/action will be given/taken if she is found guilty of driving without due care and attention? (or indeed the other two)

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) if you were stopped by the police at the time then the 14 day rule would apply.

2)you can request this or plead guilty by post beforehanda nd it is likely that will be accepted by the court. You will ahve to ask them when you get to that stage.

3)3-9 points per offence, possibly a ban if they feel it is serious enough. Fine of up to £2500 per offence. chances are they will be lumped together as it was one event so probably a fine of around £1000 and certainly points.

Dod you get on to your insurer to try and head this off with a statement about stopping and checking vehicles?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless i have missed something, i will add this: you will not go from 20 years NCB [full NCB] to zero NCB, it's a sliding scale. Depending on the policy if found at fault you will go down to 3 years, it isnt that bad either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 14 day rule would apply to a postal Notice of Intended Prosecution, if stopped by the police, then I believe they have 6 months to initiate proceedings in the Magistrates Court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 14 day limit does not apply to offences involving an accident.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops my bad, thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...