Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
    • ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD.  the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show your genuine remorse face to face to the magistrate, BRIEFLY mention how a criminal record would hinder your future then hope they take pity on you and dont also record this on your file.  PS its only declarable/shows there for one year anyway. regardless to what an employer might ask in job questionnaires past 1yrs you forget about it. they cannot see it even on enhanced DBS etc etc. you should not latterly ever appeal a criminal record for this type (1yrs)  of 'offence' its not worth it and if you lose said appeal it will cost your dear in terms of additional wages grabbing and court fees. and extends the time it shows if you lose too. dx  
    • hit letter of claim follow post 2 despite repeated requests, the claimant has failed to produce any enforceable paperwork.
    • FTMDave - your cold light of day suspicions are correct, alas. Just had this back... Thank you for your email. I was very sorry to learn that you recently received a parking charge notice after shopping at our Kearsley Manchester Rd Express store. I appreciate this is always frustrating, especially as you'd just nipped in for the one item. I've had a look, and I can confirm that in this case the car park at this store is entirely owned by a third party - it is not owned or operated by Tesco in any way. The parking charge issued is on behalf of that third party, although I appreciate it does state Tesco on the letter. Regrettably as the car park is owned and operated by a separate company we don't have any form of influence or control over the parking charges issued. In this case, I can only recommend that you follow the appeals process outlined on the letter directly to take the matter up with UKPPO directly. I'm sorry that I cannot offer further help in this case.  Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you require anything further.  Kind regards Ewan Kelly Customer Service Specialist On behalf of the Chief Executive’s Office
    • The IMF estimates Russia's economy will grow faster than the likes of the US, UK and Germany this year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell claimform - old 3 mobile debt ***Claim Discontinued***


voqu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

received on Saturday a claimform from Lowell stating that despite previous attempts to contact me they have now issued a court claim.

The 3 contract was from 2015 from what i can work out.

can anyone help please. T

 

he issue date is the 5th december.

 

Cheers

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum in view of the court claim.

 

Please read the following link and then copy and paste the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice on how to proceed.

 

The process of responding to the claim is fully explained in the following link.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do-**UPDATED-2018**(2-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio I ltd

 

Date of issue – 05/12/2018

 

Date to acknowledge - 23/12/2018

 

date to submit defence - 07/01/2019

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for –

1) The defendant entered into an agreement with Three Mobile

 

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated

 

3 The right to collect the outstanding balance was assigned to the Claiment by Hutchinson 3G on 21/12/2017 and notice given to the defendant.

 

4)Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £1021.08 remains due and outstanding.

 

And the Claimant claims

a) The said sum of £1021.08

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue accruing at a daily rate of £0.224, but limited to one year, being£77.88

c) costs

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes i think so

 

What is the total value of the claim? £1248.96

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? mobile phone

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? yes

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. assigned to lowell

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? can't remember

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? no

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? no

 

Why did you cease payments? I honestly can't remember

 

What was the date of your last payment? 2015

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? not sure

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no

Edited by dx100uk
format

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys i have sent a cpr request and filled out the form on MCOL what do i need to do for my defence now please. Any help will be grateful

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not due until 4th Jan 2019...but take a look at similar threads and in the Legal Success Forum on Mobile claims discontinued.

 

This will give you an idea of the layout and content.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hope i can use this for my defence

 

Particulars of Claim:

 

1) The Defandant entered into an agreement with 3g Hutchinson under account reference 0000000000 ('the agreement').

2) The Defandant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was cancelled.

3) The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on **/**/**** and notice given to the defendant.

4) Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of ****.** remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims

a) The said sum of ****.**

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of 0.044 but limited to one year being 9.52

c) Costs

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted.I have in the past entered into a contract with 3g Hutchinson however I do not recall the exact details or recall any outstanding balance and have requested that the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request. The claimant has yet to comply.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is also noted but again I do not recall any breach and therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/Contract; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of breach and quantify any debt outstanding.

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

3. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.An Unfair Term and Condition pursuant to Consumer Rights Act 2015.(If you entered into the contract after 1 October 2015.If you entered into the contract before 01 October 2015 then it will be governed by the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCRs).

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Added a new point (b) and also added to point 5......delete which is not applicable.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this ok now to send

 

Particulars of Claim:

 

1) The Defendant entered into an agreement with 3g Hutchinson under account reference 0000000000 ('the agreement').

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was cancelled.

3) The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on **/**/**** and notice given to the defendant.

4) Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of ****.** remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims

a) The said sum of ****.**

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of 0.044 but limited to one year being 9.52

c) Costs

 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted.I have in the past entered into a contract with 3g Hutchinson however I do not recall the exact details or recall any outstanding balance and have requested that the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request. The claimant has yet to comply.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is also noted but again I do not recall any breach and therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/Contract; and

(b) show and disclose evidence of the nature of breach and quantify any debt outstanding.

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

3. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.An Unfair Term and Condition governed by the Unfair terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCRs).

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Latest update finally just received a n159 form asking if I want it to be dealt with papers only, dont agree with it or last option is send completed form to other party. Whats the best option?

 

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell claimform - old 3 mobile debt

you object as you wish a hearing to personally cross examine any evidence the claimant may provide.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok thanks dx. I have sent it back yesterday with a copy going to Powell's. Hopefully court case will be soon and I can get this off my back.

 

Damn just gone looking for the file with my paper work in and I have lost it. I've got my letters sent out on file but I don't have the documents sent by Lowell to me. Can I send a letter for them again from Lowell. They was a notice of selling of the debt to Lowell with a balance stating that it was not a termination but the whole amount of a 24 month contract.

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So 7- 11 are what you must do no later than 28 days (Monday 16th Dec 2019) before the hearing date (12/1/2020).I would also ring the court on the 16th Jan 20201 to check if the claimant has paid the hearing fee.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok understood andyorch, I'll work on my ws in the meantime and hopefully have something that will help.

Edited by voqu

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Right just rang court today to check on this case and the claimant has filed a notice of discontinuation in October but hasn't informed me about it. I'll chalk this up as a win then.

prelim sent 8/07/06 for 2300.00

lba sent 24/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expected........well done thread title updated.

 

We could also do with a little help......

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Lowell claimform - old 3 mobile debt ***Claim Discontinued***

and another Lowell mobile debt disc'd

:cheer2:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...