Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A complaint 12 Months after the event.....................   Complaints about GP's are taken very seriously. Its not surprising he wouldn't want to see you alone, maybe with a chaperone, but not alone.   So you intend to complain again................................   You had best be careful or the Practice will strike you off and then you might be stuck. Just see another GP at the same Practice and move on.   H
    • Good Afternoon all.   Please forgive my naivety, this is my first post and I would really appreciate some advice.    I purchased a Ford Ranger 2015 plate from Ron Whites Trade Cars in Wakefield on 18th Feb this year. I paid £6,700 on debit card and was given £4000 trade in for my 2010 Nissan Navara, so £10,700 in total. Inclusive of 6 months 3rd party warranty.   I had recently been diagnosed with secondary cancer in my bones (including spine which affects my mobility) and needed a reliable vehicle to travel to and from hospital of which I made him aware of. Also that I have several dogs and horses and therefore needed a pick up.  My dear Dad helped me with the cost of the car.    At my request, he put a new MOT on it and I collected it a few days later.    On Thursday 9th May, having driven no more than 500 miles from collection,  I was driving at about 45 MPH, when I was approaching a 30 MPH zone and a busy crossroads, and went to apply the brakes. The brakes failed (as in nothing at all) and I had to slow the car through the gears and apply the handbrake narrowly missing several cars.  I can't tell you how frightening it was, and I have been scared driving since.    I called Ron Whites Trade cars ltd and spoke to the dealer.  He told me to call the warranty company. Which I did. They advised me to call a tow truck and tow to a VAT registered non-main dealer.    The warranty company - clearly not worth the paper it is written on - said I need to show full service history. I realised then (my bad) that it never came with FSH, despite the advert declaring that it did. I have screen shots of the advert that verify this.   The garage where it was towed to called me the next day and asked how long I had had it. I explained not long. Their head mechanic said an unaligned fitted part - fitted prior to purchase (vacuum pump to brake servo?) has caused the damage and it was likely to be a very large bill. He advised me to call the dealer and under the CRA 2015 ask him to repair it or reject it.    I called him back and without going into details - he refused to help. The mechanic from where it is currently sat also had several conversations with him. Apparently the dealer became quite threatening and abusive.  The mechanic advised him to come and collect the car and repair it as he should do under CRA 2015. The conversation ended with the dealer telling him to just fix it and bill me.    I emailed and sent a recorded letter on 10th May, advising them to collect the vehicle and repair it or pay the garage where it currently stands or I shall take legal action.    I heard nothing.   I am now going to authorise the garage to carry out the repairs and will be seeking costs through the small claims court.  I have researched the company and they have a large selection of vehicles, last assets were recorded at just under £600k.  Most of the stock is stored at the Director's home address. Which is where I purchased the car from. Although the receipt states Ron White Trade Cars Ltd.    I desperately need the vehicle and although I have an old Peugeout 106 as a loan car - I can't possible carry out my hobbies and usual daily life in it.   My poor Dad is lending me the money to repair it.    My questions are:  A) Can I start the small claims process now? The reason is that I have a DS1500 form - which basically means I may have less than six months to live - but hopefully more! Could the case be expedited in order I can settle things sooner for obvious reasons?  B) Do I sent another email/text advising that tomorrow I will start the claim? B) I have no idea what the total bill will be until the car is fixed - so do I claim an 'undisclosed amount?' C) What wording do I put on the form - what detail should I absolutely not miss out?  D) The registered address on Company House is that of an office elsewhere. I assume the accountants address. I collected the car from his home address (approximately 30 other cars were there) so can I send the court papers to this address? E) Who do I put on the papers? Ie Ron White trade cars ltd. Or the director I dealt with (of which there are 3)  F) I have been advised to get an independent report - but this is going to delay the process even further. The mechanic has advised he will take photos and written evidence. Would this suffice before a judge?    I'm very grateful to anyone who has read this, and apologise for such a long post.  Many thanks         
    • 2 years ago I made a complaint against a GP at my surgery....the reply I received was the GP could not recall the events (in the complaint) because the GP see so many patients a day and the complaint I sent was 12 months after the event.   Now to what happened recently....   1. I had a appoointment at 10am with the same GP I had made a complaint againt over 1 year ago...I booked myself at reception and waited, waited when it was 10.20 I asked at receptionion when would I been seent, as my appointment was at 10am. A receptionist told me 'There has been an emergency of some kind with a patient...so that has caused a delay and your appointment will now be moved to another GP' - I asked why the appointment was moved and was told 'sorry I cannot tell you' and you will be seen soon.   2. 10.30am and still not been seen so I asked another receptionist, she checked the computer system and told me the GP (name) has refused to see me because I made a complaint against him over 12 months ago and now my appointment was being moved to a different GP and I had to wait. I told the receptionist this was wrong and the GP had to be impartial as a GP and he was making this personal by not seeing me.   3. Eventually I was called and saw a different GP and explained to him what happened and the GP I had originally had an appointment with had refused to see me because of a complaint I raised against him over 12 months ago. The GP I was with was shocked and surprised and told me that GP should not have refused to see me   NOW I need your help to write a complaint, please can you help me
    • ok...thank you. I have read the post (thank you for guiding me to that) and will write in similar thread.   My worry is that I lied to the inspector about not having used the card before. I also recall now that he did not ask me to sign the notes he took so I am worried I have no idea what he wrote down.    Without my signature on his notes, would this be admissible evidence in court?
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 3 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
WontGetFooledAgain

SOFOLOGY giving me the run-around. Any advice please?***Settled***

Recommended Posts

I received leather sofa from Sofology, financed with an Int. free loan from Barclays (Partner Finance)

Hours after delivery, it became obvious that the sofa had manufacturing faults (different cushion front panel heights, and inadequate partly filled cushions to the seating area.

 

  • Raised a complaint (!) and provided photo/video evidence....asked for correction or collection!
  • Initially fobbed off, told there was nothing wrong.
  • Persisted, and 3 weeks later, I appear to be dealing with a senior colleague, instead of the 11 or so 'Tom, Dick and Harriets' that I had encountered in a sequence of email/call centre 'one-off' contacts.

 

I have informed Sofology that I wish to return the sofa, due to it's failings, and also that it fails to match the quality of the original in-store sofa observed at time of ordering. Q- Might this form a 'breach of contract'?

 

I'm not a legal person and don't want the 'Perry Mason' in me to get completely carried away!

 

FWIW I have complained to Barclays, and they have started a Sect 75 complaint....but I've no idea where that might go.

 

However....after essentially ignoring me for over a fortnight....Sofology have perked up a bit when Barclays presented the complaint.

 

Position I'm now in is:

 

Either.....allow Homserve rep. (supposedly independent....really?) to visit, assess and provide an 'honest' report.

Sofolgy's subsequent action, in terms of the 'refund' (to Barclays) and to end the finance agreement will depend on this 'report'

 

OR....as the defects/faults are considered 'un'confirmed, (in spite of Video evidence) they will take back the Sofa, and charge me a 30% (£300+) cancellation fee. Is it correct to consider this as a cancellation.....the item is defective??!

 

Haven't encountered this idea of being charged in order to return a defective item......is that legal?

 

Would appreciate any help from members

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

under the Consumer rights act if a defect appears within the first 30 days then you are entitled to a refund or a repair at your option.

 

Write them a recorded delivery letter and tell them that you are invoking your short-term right to return and that you wants your money back and you want me to collect the sofa immediately.

Send the letter by recorded delivery and by email


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great....thanks for the reply!

 

in an e-mail to 'em yesterday, I included:

"Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 goods you supply must be fit for purpose. As there was a problem with the goods when I bought them, I request that you refund Barclays, and end the agreement between us."

(Hard to know how to phrase the 'refund' bit....is it to me, or to Barclays??)

 

This was totally ignored in earlier replies today.

 

Replies from them seem to indicate that there is now an indecent haste to choose...and choose now!!

The short/sweet 'take it or leave it' email received last was essentially:

(obviously keeping reply impersonal for this forum)

"The options are:

- Cancellation and refund with a 30% charge

- Inspection of furniture

 

Kind Regards,

Xxxxx Xxxxxx

Finance............. Specialist"

 

This can't be right....and I will be following your suggested line of tack. Thankyou!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not entitled to quibble or to levy inspection charges or to apply any administration charges. There has to be a no quibble refund and they have to bear all the costs.

 

You should be warned that this company, Sofology don't seem to be very cooperative when dealing with their customers consumer rights.

 

Stand your ground. I don't know what the value of this sofa is but I'm quite sure that it is well below the small claims limit which means that you can sue them without any worries of having to pay costs in the most unlikely event that you could lose the case.

 

If you are prepared to take a county court action against them, then send them a 14 day letter before claim and tell them that if they don't collect the sofa and refund your money by the end of that 14 days that you will issue a claim in the County Court and without further notice.

 

Only make this threat if you're prepared to carry it through. However County Court procedure at this level is extremely easy and pretty well risk-free. We will help you all the way.

 

We get too many stories about SOFOLOGY. It's good when people stand up to them.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally, where are you getting this "fit for purpose" stuff? The short-term right to reject becomes available simply if there is a defect. There is no mention in the statute as to how serious the defect must be.

 

Stop using this fit for purpose language. You simply give them a hook to try and deny you your rights.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent.....I wondered about that....gives more opprtunities for tyre-kicking!!

 

Incidentally.....is the refund to me....or Barclays?

 

....and do I address letter to CEO.....I can Google him!!??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....Oh...and forgot to say:

 

Received sofa on 6th Nov.....1st complained 16th November.....it's now 7th December.

(been fobbed off essentially for 3 weeks....have kept records/paper-trail though)

 

I did request return and money back as early as 21st Nov

.....now beginning to worry that I've been timed out?

 

Might this present a problem??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a vague possibility it could present a problem. Straightly speaking you should have asserted your right. However, there is not much at stake and if I were you I would simply go for it. Tell them that you reported the defect within the first 30 days you now giving them 14 days and then you issue.

 

Stop mucking around. Stop being led around by the nose. Take control or else just let it go.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The "inspector" will say that the sofa is ok because he's paid by sofology.

I had a dreams inspector around who said that a 40% sagging on a 6 month old mattress is normal.

He showed up with a 4 inch ruler to check the sagging and he said there wasn't any.

Then I gave him a 6 foot spirit level and he had to agree that the sagging was there but "only" 40% of the total mattress thickness is apparently normal.

Funnily enough he didn't say that to me, he wrote that in his report.

Threat of court got me the money back faster than the speed of light, so stand your ground.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you complained within 14 days ..no quibble allowed.

you don't want it

full refund please

 

BPF are equally liable under sec 75.

have you paid anything to them yet?

do you want to keep it or just forget it all happened?

 

if you don't want the thing... pers i'd be telling BCF they are to demand sofology come collect the item and for BCF to cancel the agreement and refund any money you have paid to them back to you. else as BF stated you will issue a court claim against both BCF and sofology within 14 days without further notice.

 

that should get a result pretty quick

 

SF and BCF can argue the 30% charge out between themselves.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks also to king12345 ...and dx100uk for joining in!!

 

I want to get this right....does this work as a body of text as the letter??

 

"With reference to my complaint raised on 16th November, I am invoking my short-term right to return the sofa referenced above.

Your records will show that I have repeatedly requested return of sofa from as early as 18th November, and this has fallen on deaf ears.

I request return of all monies immediately, and also request your immediate collection of said sofa.

Failure to comply within 14 days will result in the issue of a court claim against both Barclays Partner Finance and Sofology"

 

Please be brutal!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter is fine – as long as you mean to go ahead with it.

 

Send the letter by first class recorded post. In the meantime open up an account on moneyclaim online and start reading on this forum about the steps to begin the County Court action.

 

 

Your particulars of claim would be:

 

Claimant purchased a sofa from the defendant cost £XXX, invoice reference XXX

within XX days of delivery of the sofa the claimant became aware of defects and immediately informed the defendant and demanded a refund under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and also that the defendant arrange to collect the sofa.

The defendant has refused to give the refund or to collect the sofa.

The claimant claims £XXX plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Letters done....both Barclays and Sofology.....off to get them away by registered post...Phew!!!

 

Thanks again BankFodder ......will look into links you gave above:-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would change the first part to "You have ignored my request of refund when I invoked the short term right to return the sofa under the Consumer Regulation Act 2015."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would change the first part to "You have ignored my request of refund when I invoked the short term right to return the sofa under the Consumer Regulation Act 2015."

 

How about....

 

"With reference to my complaint raised on 16th November, I am for the final time, requesting a refund, which you have previously ignored, and am invoking my short-term right to return the sofa referenced above, under the Consumer Regulation Act 2015."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good.

When you wrote "I am NOW invoking..." they could have "misinterpreted that and say that you were NOW asking a refund which would be out of time.

Every word counts with these people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the clock stopped for them when you first contacted them so they cant say you are timed out because of their inertia. However, I agree that making it clear in your letter you are enforcing your rights rather than invoking them late

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the clock stopped for them when you first contacted them so they cant say you are timed out because of their inertia. However, I agree that making it clear in your letter you are enforcing your rights rather than invoking them late

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aaaaggghh....worrying that I've screwed this up already!!?

 

As I mentioned on Saturday.....I've sent off 2 letters....one to both BPF and Sofology.

These are the first 'hard-copy'/written elements to my claim so far.......prior to that, everything was by e-mail and phone. Have I satisfied 'pre-action protocol'?

 

I know it's a PITA....but was hoping someone might skim the text....and if I've ballsed up...I can start again!

Have I made things complicated by roping together both Sofology and BPF in the same notice of intent?(issue?)

 

The italicised/underlined section is the bit that went to Sofology....BPF got the lot.....it seemed a good idea at the time

 

Text to BPF went :

 

"...........You will be aware of the complaint I raised with BPF on the 22nd Nov against Sofology

 

Sofology appear to have learned of that complaint on Wednesday 5th December, with bullying now taking the place of slow inadequate response, which had been my experience to that point.

 

Find below the letter/email I am sending to Sofology :

 

With reference to my complaint raised on 16th November, I am for the final time, requesting a refund, which you have previously ignored, and am invoking my short-term right to return the sofa referenced above, under the Consumer Regulation Act 2015.

Your records will show that I have repeatedly requested return of sofa from as early as 18th November, and this has fallen on deaf ears.

I request return of all monies immediately, and also request your immediate collection of said sofa.

Failure to comply within 14 days will result in the issue of a County Court claim against both Barclays Partner Finance and Sofology without further notice.

 

I request now that you should demand that Sofology collect the item, and that Barclays Partner Finance cancel the agreement referenced above, and refund payment(s) already made.

 

Failure to comply within 14 days will result in the issue of a County Court claim against both Barclays Partner Finance and Sofology without further notice.........."

 

Just don't want to be pi**ing into the wind right from the start....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine.

Don't Think that you need a lot of big words and legal jargon, that's not how it works.

I've always advised that the clearer the better so they can't say that it was not understandable.

You spelt it out to them in plain English, that's good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericsbrother and King12345

 

Email from BPF arrived this morning....not sure how to handle it tbh!

As I mentioned in post #1.....BPF had commenced an 'investigation' to my complaint under sect.75

 

They're looking for more info....here's the gist :

 

In order to investigate your concerns further, we require some additional information.

 

Can you provide me with a timeline of events, including:

• When did you first noticed the problems?

• When did you first notify Sofology?

• Has any remedial work been completed?

• When did they come out to your property?

• What did they do on the visit(s)

• List of outstanding issues as it stands today

• Photographs of the problems as it stands today

• Copy of your sales invoice

 

I'm uncertain whether they've seen my letter before action....which would've arrived today at the latest....and don't want to compromise my position.

 

Question Should I deal directly with BPF and supply info now....or remind them that a letter before action has been sent, and I'm sticking to that route??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Respond to their questions and let them know about the deadline set by your lba.

However, I am not sure if there's a max time for finance companies to deal with section 75.

As far as I know there's no mention in the legislation, so your 14 days should be fine.

Experts in section 75 will surely confirm or correct me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE.....and some clarification needed please!!

 

Contacted by Sofology on Tues. afternoon.

They've received LBA.....and offered to take back sofa, with loss of my £71.90 deposit.

Told them that wasn't acceptable and I was going for 100% refund....as stated in letter.

Was then told I'd be contacted in 48 hours....which has now gone. I assume that they're waiting for my next move?

 

I now have moneyclaim form on screen....and there are a few 'fields' I need to be sure of:

 

Date money became owed to you is this the date I 1st requested refund??

Date you are issuing the claim...???...date of LBA???....todays date???

Claim amount:.....pretty sure that's the full Sales Order amount

Daily rate of interest up to the date of judgment:.....now I'm really stuck...:)

 

 

Also...since there are 2 defendants...Sofology and BPF....does the following statement work??

 

Claimant purchased a sofa from the defendant 1 at cost £XXX, invoice reference XXX, this being financed by Defendant 2.

 

On 1st day of delivery of the sofa the claimant became aware of defects and after 10 days, informed the defendant 1, and demanded a refund under the Consumer Rights Act of 2015 and also that the defendant 1 arrange to collect the sofa.

The defendant 1 has refused to give the refund or to collect the sofa. ( Where does defendant 2 come in??...feels a bit shaky.)

The claimant claims £XXX plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984

 

I'm wondering if it might be best just to stick to the one defendant (Sofology)...as BPF are currently (supposedly) doing a sect 75 investigation on my behalf?....Oh what a tangled web!!!!

Just want to get this spot on before I push the button!

Edited by WontGetFooledAgain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...