Jump to content

Recommended Posts

BENNISON, JASON

 

Heathlands, Weston Green, THAMES DITTON, Surrey, KT7 0JZ

Birth details: 14 January 1967

JASON BENNISON, also known as Jason BAILEY, of Heathlands, Weston Green, Thames Ditton, Surrey KT7 0JZ, sometimes resident at Blk 39 Lot 8, La Aldea Del Mar, Cebu 6017, Philippines

In the County Court at Kingston-upon-Thames

No 26 of 2018

Date of Filing Petition: 29 March 2018

Bankruptcy order date: 2 October 2018

Time of Bankruptcy Order: 11:16

Whether Debtor's or Creditor's Petition—Creditor's

Name and address of petitioner: Nominet LimitedMinerva House, Oxford Science Park, OXFORD, OX4 4DQ

L Cook 11th Floor, Southern House, Wellesley Grove, Croydon, CR0 1XN, telephone: 0208 681 5166

Capacity of office holder(s): Trustee

2 October 2018

 

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3160581

 

 

Please keep this thread orderly and polite.

 

Thanks to user: ploddertom for this heads up


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OO events have caught up with him. I see that Nominet was a petitioner.


The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is he? Oh wait. Is he that fotm muppet?


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It certainly is about time that someone caught up with him.


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to

donatelink3.gif through PayPal (opens in a new window)

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy -

HERE

2: Take back control of your finances -

Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated -

Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3160581

 

 

Please keep this thread orderly and polite.

 

The background to Jason Bennison's bankruptcy is outlined in the following thread.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481616-Dealing-with-Bailiffs-JASON-BENNISON-and-NOMINET-LIMITED-(A-FIRM)-order-of-the-High-Court

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It certainly is about time that someone caught up with him.

 

A week before the petition had been filed, Jason Bennison 'claimed' that he had sold each of his website to a Philippine based 'venture capital company'.

 

Alarmingly, around the same time, he set up yet ANOTHER 'bailiff' website.

 

What is important about this particular one, is that it has been DELIBERATELY built on his instructions so that the site resembles down to the finest detail an official government website or government endorsed website. The Ministry of Justice is aware and so too is his trustee in bankruptcy and Trading Standards.

 

PS: By way of evidence, around the same time as he 'claimed' to have sold his other websites, he placed an advert on a website called Freelancer where he provided the most detailed instruction as to how he wanted this new website to look (including how he wanted to replace the CROWN logo and the words GOV.UK etc).

 

PS: His online request on Freelancer is a public document. Would the moderators mind if I posted a copy on the forum?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Best not BA. We don't need the possible hassle this might create.


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there is no way he could ever open a gov.uk short-they are strictly controlled

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Well there is no way he could ever open a gov.uk site-they are strictly controlled

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I am on my IPad which has a mind of its own.

He will be skinned by those handling his bankruptcy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doubt whether he'll care lookinforinfo, could be one of the reasons he has relocated to the Philippines.


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably worse then Ploddertom . The filipina women also know know how to skin a man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well there is no way he could ever open a gov.uk short-they are strictly controlled

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Well there is no way he could ever open a gov.uk site-they are strictly controlled

 

He contacted a draftsman on a techie forum, his instruction was to make it similar to the .gov site. Its an open site so you can read it.


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would mimic the layout, fonts etc,a bit like the fake sites used for phishing by fraudsters.


The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would mimic the layout, fonts etc,a bit like the fake sites used for phishing by fraudsters.

 

Yes indeed, exactly like that.

The advice it contains is almost entirely wrong, and would undoubtedly worsen a debtors situation considerably, in my opinion.


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The “fact”, and I use that term guardedly, is that you allege a breach of contract so significant that it justified your resigning - "constructive unfair dismissal". That is the fact that you are claiming. You are discussing evidence here - something that proves the fact. Evidence does not need to be included in the ET1, and few would include anything more than a cursory overview. The tribunal does not "hear" your ET1.  They hear your evidence supporting the allegation you made in your ET1. Do you understand the difference? So evidence may still be collected and may come to light. Technically, right up to the hearing, although, in practice, you need permission to include any evidence not disclosed in the exchange of bundles.    If you have already exchanged bundles, although seems unlikely, then you would need the permission of the tribunal to add further evidence. 
    • You were of course quite within your rights to ask questions with regard to the member of staff’s authority over you etc, and all you legally have to supply is your name and address. It sounds as though he thought you were being difficult? This doesn’t help your case of course, but that’s how it sounded Reading your post.    I suggest awaiting any correspondence from the train operator and go from there. You mentioned you were read your rights, or words to that effect? You were cautioned, but it sounds like you chose not to answer any questions. This is of course your right, but in refusing to answer questions, you can’t really submit any defence for your actions should the matter go to court. That’s the whole idea of the caution.   reading your post, it sounds like you want to hold your hands up anyway, so is and when a letter does arrive, I’d suggest a ‘damage limitation’ approach and send the default grovelling reply asking to meet their reasonable admin charges to keep the matter out of court.
    • I'm sure it will. Take your time to absorb it and don't put yourself under pressure. You'll get there, lots of people have.   HB
    • Definitely, the more info the better for me... Hopefully some of all this expert advice/ experience will rub off and start to stick!   
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...