Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to update, i have received a letter this morning from Arrow Global-   We thank you for your letter and acknowledge your request for documentation pursuant of the consumer credit act 1974. We do not accept that we are the creditor as envisaged by the above statute. However, we are willing to assist in obtaining that which has been requested.We will now process your request for documentation from the creditor and will respond in due course. We confirm that all collection activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents.   So i assume Arrow have not bought the debt and are collecting for either another DCA or indeed the origianol creditor in this case would be Marks & Spencer. not sure to as if this is good news that they have not produced it or bad news they may be going back to M&S,Can anyone chuck some light on it for me   Many Thanks to all
    • Hello. I'm asking a question regarding paying a PPI company. I won't name names, unless anyone thinks it's relevant. My partner made a claim to a PPI company a few weeks before the deadline. He received a letter from Lloyds asking for authority for them to act, which he supplied. A couple of weeks later, rather unexpectedly, he had a letter from Lloyds with an offer, which he accepted. He's now received the payment. In all of this time, he had nothing from the PPI company apart from the odd text, asking him to keep them informed if he heard anything. He scanned the letter with the offer from Lloyds and emailed it to them as requested, expecting them to invoice him, he has no intention of not paying, even though they seem to have done next to nothing. This week, he receive 2 letters from them containing 3 forms in total, for him to complete, checking his details as Lloyds told them there was an error. I've advised him to ignore the form, since he's been paid & is just waiting for them to claim the money from him, and if they're so inefficient, that they ignore emails virtually offering them money, they might forget about it altogether! Is this the right course of action? He's concerned they'll take him to court for not paying, but I don't see how they can, when they've never even asked for any. Any advice greatly appreciated.  
    • I think you should have included the letter in your bundle to VCS and the Court. That way I would think VCS would not wish to go to Court as they would have to admit that they had been issuing PCNs for several years having no contract to do so. Completely blowing out of the water their statement that they  adhere to the Code of Conduct. As they haven't and also lied in their Witness statement, it should be pointed out that they should not be able to access the DVLA for motorists data when they have breached the Code for so long . It should also be pointed out their other misrepresentation. as I pointed out on post 123 and 126.
    • Thanks for all your help so far, it's appreciated. Received the notice of allocation to the small claims track from my local court with the following page being directions. First and foremost it reminds them to pay a fee. I'm PC savvy so I'll post up a copy of the letter with details removed a bit later.
    • grr.. THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS they cant enter any property or do ANYTHING.    
  • Our picks

dave466

JC/Moriarty claimform - Old talk talk home phone/broadband account.***Claim Dismissed***

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? Jc international acquisitions

Date of issue – 28th November 2018

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

1.The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement with talk talk limited dated 11/12/2012 Which was assigned to the claimant on 31/03/2015 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 31/03/2015 and which is now all due and payable.

 

2.The defendant agreed to pay monthly instalments under account number xxxxxx but has failed to do so.

 

3.And the claimant claims the sum of £135.30.

The claimant also claims interest thereon pursuant to s.69 county court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £10.82

 

What is the value of the claim? £221.12

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? The claim is from a house phone/broadband account.

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After 2007

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to debt purchaser issued by MORIARTY LAW.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I don't believe so

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't believe so

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not that I am aware.

 

Why did you cease payments? Not sure

 

What was the date of your last payment? Not sure

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I don't believe so no.

Edited by dx100uk
format

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=Jc+international+acquisitions&sa=Search+CAG

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for late reply.

And was done and cpr sent last week. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DEFENCE

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. The Claimant claims £221.12 is owed

I did not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant and the claimants solicitor by way of a CPR 31.14 request who are yet to fully comply.

 

2. The Claimants statement regarding the assignation of the debt is denied.

I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served on the defendant from the Claimant Jc International acquisitions.

 

3. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 88 CCA1974

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4. On receipt of this claim I requested, by way of a CPR 31.14 request, copies of the documents referred to within the Claimant's particulars in order to establish what the claim is for. To date the Claimant solicitors, Moriarty Law have failed to fully comply with this request.

 

5. As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

6. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the consumer crediticon Act 1974.

 

7. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Should there also be anything in there with regards to PAP?

Regards.

Edited by dx100uk
merge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes if it wasn't sent elsewhere as you've moved?

 

read the link in post 2

that above is not our usual defence for a TT BB debt.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We havnt moved dx been in same house for 15 years.

Sorry I was using am old defence I had and just altered it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that is still not our std defence referring to no pap nor the Ofcom guidelines.

 

dx

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

adapt AS NECESSARY

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE ONLY

 

The Defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1.The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claimicon pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

.

2. Paragraph 1 is accepted. I have, in the past, entered into a contract with EE Limited , however I do not recall the exact details. I have requested the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14. The claimant has refused to provide me with a copy of the agreement, stating they are not obligated to do so by virtue of the consumer credit Act 1974. To date, no statement of the alleged account has been received.

.

3. Paragraph 2 is noted, again I do not recall any breach and I have never received the stated Default Notice. The Claimant has stated, by letter, that he is not obligated to provide a copy of the Default Notice, again by virtue of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

4. Paragraph 3 is denied.I do not recall having received a Notice of Assignment, as stated by the Claimant. They have sent an alleged copy dated 18 November 2016 from my cpr31.14 request. This is the first time i have seen this letter.

.

5. Paragraph 4 is denied in regards that the claimant is misleading the court in its pleadings and has never made contact or made requests prior to issuing this claim. Its sole purpose in purchasing this debt was to litigate and secure a county court Judgment and therefore Pre Action Protocol was never attempted and should be considered in deciding the outcome of their claim

.

Therefore the Claimant is to provide strict proof to:

.

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/ Contract; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

.

6. The Claimant has stated that he has made several requests for repayment, yet I do not acknowledge any debt to the Claimant.

.

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is required that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

.

8. As the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim, due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

.

9. Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

.

10. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief

.

nicked from andyorch


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for the time and information.

I have adapted it accordingly to my case and hopefully this is better.

Thank You once again.

 

1.The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement with talk talk limited dated 11/12/2012 Which was assigned to the claimant on 31/03/2015 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 31/03/2015 and which is now all due and payable.

 

2.The defendant agreed to pay monthly instalments under account number xxxxxx but has failed to do so.

 

3.And the claimant claims the sum of £135.30.

The claimant also claims interest thereon pursuant to s.69 county courticon act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £10.82

DEFENCE

 

The Defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1.The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (pre action protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claimicon pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is accepted. I have, in the past, entered into a contract with Talk Talk Limited , however I do not recall the exact details. I have requested the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14.

The claimant is yet to provide me with a copy of the agreement and to date no statement of the alleged account has been received.

I do not recall any breach and I have never received any Default Notice.

I do not recall having received a Notice of Assignment, as stated by the Claimant.

 

Therefore the Claimant is to provide strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/ Contract; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

3. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is required that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

4. As the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim, due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

5. Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You must put the claimant to strict proof to disclose....point (B) must be added

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to section 87(1) CCA1974

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't believe so

 

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement with talk talk limited dated 11/12/2012 Which was assigned to the claimant on 31/03/2015 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 31/03/2015 and which is now all due and payable.

 

2.The defendant agreed to pay monthly instalments under account number xxxxxx but has failed to do so.

 

3.And the claimant claims the sum of £135.30.

The claimant also claims interest thereon pursuant to s.69 county courticon act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £10.82

 

DEFENCE

 

 

The Defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1.The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (pre action protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claimicon pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is accepted. I have, in the past, entered into a contract with Talk Talk Limited , however I do not recall the exact details. I have requested the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14.

The claimant is yet to provide me with a copy of the agreement and to date no statement of the alleged account has been received.

I do not recall any breach and I have never received any Default Notice.

I do not recall having received a Notice of Assignment, as stated by the Claimant.

 

Therefore the Claimant is to provide strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/ Contract; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to section 87(1) CCA1974

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

3. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is required that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

4. As the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim, due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

5. Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just realised this is a telecom claim therefore CCA is not applicable.....amend the following and remove the parts in red

 

2. Paragraph 1 is accepted. I have, in the past, entered into a contract with Talk Talk Limited , however I do not recall the exact details. I have requested the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14.

The claimant is yet to provide me with a copy of the agreement and to date no statement of the alleged account has been received.

I do not recall any breach and I have never received any Default Notice.

I do not recall having received a Notice of Assignment, as stated by the Claimant.

 

Therefore the Claimant is to provide strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/ Contract; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to section 87(1) CCA1974


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How's this now.

 

1.The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement with talk talk limited dated 11/12/2012 Which was assigned to the claimant on 31/03/2015 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 31/03/2015 and which is now all due and payable.

 

2.The defendant agreed to pay monthly instalments under account number xxxxxx but has failed to do so.

 

3.And the claimant claims the sum of £135.30.

The claimant also claims interest thereon pursuant to s.69 county courticon act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £10.82

DEFENCE

 

 

The Defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1.The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (pre action protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claimicon pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is accepted. I have, in the past, entered into a contract with Talk Talk Limited , however I do not recall the exact details. I have requested the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14.

The claimant is yet to provide me with a copy of the agreement and to date no statement of the alleged account has been received.

 

I do not recall having received a Notice of Assignment, as stated by the Claimant.

 

Therefore the Claimant is to provide strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/ Contract; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of breach.

© show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for.

 

3. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is required that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

4. As the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim, due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

5. Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (pre action protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

Did you not receive a LBA with PAP ?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does lba mean letter before action?

If so I am not 100% sure Andy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So remove that paragraph and adjust others (numbers)

Then good to send Andy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb:

 

I have also added to the above © show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for.

 

 


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted. Save insofar as it is accepted that a contractual relationship once existed withTalk Talk Limited , however I do not recall the exact details. I have requested the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14.

The claimant is yet to provide me with a copy of the agreement and to date no statement of the alleged account has been received.

 

I do not recall having received a Notice of Assignment, as stated by the Claimant.

 

Therefore the Claimant is to provide strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/ Contract; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of breach.

© show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for.

 

2. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is required that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

3. As the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim, due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

4. Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

 

5. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would prefer " Save insofar as it is accepted that a contractual relationship once existed " rather than " I have, in the past, entered into a contract " ?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edited, is tgat now good to go mate or should I also delete out, paragraph 1 is accepted?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you could remove that also then your good to go


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy.

My final draft. All good to go?

 

The Defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and

generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case

below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular

allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Save insofar as it is accepted that a contractual relationship

once existed withTalk Talk Limited , however I do not recall the

exact details. I have requested the claimant verify the exact

details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14. The claimant is yet

to provide me with a copy of the agreement and to date no

statement of the alleged account has been received.

 

I do not recall having received a Notice of Assignment, as stated

by the Claimant.

Therefore the Claimant is to provide strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/ Contract;

and

(b) show and evidence the nature of breach.

© show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for.

 

2. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is required that the

Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

3. As the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the

Claimant has the right to lay a claim, due to contraventions of

Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

4. Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include

an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of

the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any

Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of

the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to

take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to

provide and pay for their service.

 

5. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied

that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are your thoughts on what they have disclosed ?

 

With regards to the N180....use the following to complete on screen run 3 copies.(Court/Claimants Sol/File

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?406099-LEGAL-N180-Directions-Questionnaire-(Small-Claims-Track)-**Correct-at-Sept-2016**

 

Yes to mediation

Yes to Small Claims Track

State your local county court

1 Witness ...you

 

The rest is self explanatory.

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...