Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I came back home on Monday and found this Claim form in my letter box. In the light of what I have explained earlier in regards to this debt claim, can anyone tell if I have any chance fighting it in th Court. SW in the last conversation request the proof of me living somewhere else, which I can't provide. They have info from the landlord of property being rented to me, I was there on electoral register, had bank account opened on this address, Driving licence had this address etc., but I wasn't living there.      Name of the Claimant -  Southern Water services   Date of issue – 12/06/2019     Particulars of Claim   The Claimant is statutory...etc The Claimant claims the sum £969 for unpaid water and or sewerage charges payable under s. 142-144 of the act and the Claimant Charges Scheme. The unpaid sum of £969 is for period 01/04/2014 - 08/07/2015. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year  from 08/07/2015 to 11/06/2019 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of the judgment or earlier payment at daily rate of £0.21   What is the total value of the claim? £1423   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? yes Letter before Action   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes, COA address.   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?    No, water charges   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Allegedly after - April 2012   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? No   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? No, no anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Southern Water - original creditor   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No.   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No   Why did you cease payments? Never. I wasn't aware of bills.   What was the date of your last payment? Never   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, creditor did not take my notice of bills being wrongly issued in my name.   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No  
    • If the case was brought before a UK civil court would UK rules apply or foreign rules?   I wonder if the original contract would strate what jurisdiction it's terms would be decided by?   I note that UK contracts frequently have a clause that says in so many words that any disputes  will be interpreted under UK law.
    • http://www.hadefpartners.com/News/333/Limitation-periods-in-the-United-Arab-Emirates   One of the key limitation periods to be aware of is the limitation period for a claim for breach of contract. We have been approached by many clients (including in-house counsel at large multinational and local companies, and even international law firms) who believe that the limitation period for a breach of contract (including a commercial contract) in the UAE is 15 years. What they are often not aware of is that the limitation period for commercial contracts (as set out in Federal Law 18 of 1993 (the “Commercial Code”)) is usually 10 years. Therefore, multi-million dollar claims dating back over more than 10 years may now be time-barred.   https://www.jstor.org/stable/3381662?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
    • how long did you sign up for ? if they claimed DD after that period …….
    • If this thread was started about your friend, please don't ask Q's about your dad or anyone else.   Keep this thread on track and use a new thread to discuss issues about YD, thanks.   Keeps thread simple and focused.
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
Hadituptohere

Lowells claimform - O2 debt - Airtime and phone credit agreement***Claim Discontinued***

Recommended Posts

lowells have been sending paperwork regarding several alleged accounts, they have actually made claim in Northampton bulk center, the figures dont add up, checked my noodle account and cant find the account to the value they have claimed, even the two photocopies of evidence they have sent state more than they are claiming..

 

ive acknowledged through MCOL but struggling for what to request under CPR31.14? here are their POC'S....

 

any help really appreciated

 

hadituptohere

2 Dec 2018, 11_50_15 am lowlife poc .pdf


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do-**UPDATED-2018**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

please complete the above so we have all the correct info to suitably advise

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ?......... Lowell Portfolio I LTD

 

Date of issue – 13 Nov 2018

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for –

 

1 The Defendant entered into an agreement for a O2 refresh account (the Account) with Telefonica UK ltd.

This Agreement provided both a service for agreement for the provision of airtime , and a consumer creditlink3.gif Act 1974 regulated agreement for the provision of hardware.

 

2) in breach of the agreement , the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service agreement was Terminated, with sums outstanding in respect of the provision of both airtime and hardware.

 

3) the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 31/08/2017 and notice given to the defendant.

 

4) despite repeated requests for payment the sums of 314.34 remains due and outstanding

and the Claimant claims

a) the said sum of 314.34

b) interest pursuant to S69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue but limited to one year being £25.15

c) Costs

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?.......... yes but for £388.23

 

What is the total value of the claim?...339.49 +35 court fee +50.00 Legal Costs Total 424.49

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?.. POC’S state Mobile airtime and Phone hardware

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? .... No checking my noodle default date 14/05/17 for 305.00

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? yes noodle as above

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim... lowlifes

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Had numerous letters cant remember receiving assignment

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?... Cant remember

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? yes

 

Why did you cease payments?...fell on hard times

 

What was the date of your last payment?...according to noodle oct 2017

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?...no

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? ...spoke on the phone but told them no agreement no account with them

2 Dec 2018, 12_17_36 pm notice s i a.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
merge/format

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but you'll need to type out the particulars of claim as they appear exactly and i'll add them to the above.

then we can advise what to ask for in the CPR.

as this mentions a CCA agreement for the hardware you send a CCA request too

who did you talk to over the phone and why?


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of claim: 10 The Defendant entered into an agreement for a O2 refresh account (the Account) with Telefonica UK ltd. This Agreement provided both a service for agreement for the provision of airtime , and a Consumer Credit Act 1974 regulated agreement for the provision of hardware.

2) in breach of the agreement , the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service agreement was Terminated, with sums outstanding in respect of the provision of both airtime and hardware.

3) the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 31/08/2017 and notice given to the defendant.

4) despite repeated requests for payment the sums of 314.34 remains due and outstanding and the Claimant claims a) the said sum of 314.34 b) interest pursuant to S69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue but limited to one year being £25.15 c) Costs

 

 

I spoke to lowells the last time they issued in court and withdrew regarding a provident loan, they mentioned one account then all these other alleged accounts thats were i said there are no other accounts without proof of credit agreements, havent spoken to them since

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of claim: 10 The Defendant entered into an agreement for a O2 refresh account (the Account) with Telefonica UK ltd. This Agreement provided both a service for agreement for the provision of airtime , and a Consumer Credit Act 1974 regulated agreement for the provision of hardware.

2) in breach of the agreement , the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service agreement was Terminated, with sums outstanding in respect of the provision of both airtime and hardware.

3) the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 31/08/2017 and notice given to the defendant.

4) despite repeated requests for payment the sums of 314.34 remains due and outstanding and the Claimant claims a) the said sum of 314.34 b) interest pursuant to S69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue but limited to one year being £25.15 c) Costs

 

 

I spoke to lowells the last time they issued in court and withdrew regarding a provident loan, they mentioned one account then all these other alleged accounts thats were i said there are no other accounts without proof of credit agreements, havent spoken to them since

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you

 

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [you can ask for everything in the list]

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou dx

 

 

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sent the CPR31:14 to the Solicitors and the CCA request to the claimant being Lowell Portfolio I Ltd, submitted an embarrassed defense by MCOL for which I have received acknowledgment of from the County Court Business Center

.

11 days later I received a letter from Lowell Solicitors dated the day after the acknowledgment from the courts that I have failed to respond to the court claim (conveniently) threatening what they will do if I dont respond by the 16th December...

 

They must really have it in for me as they now claim to have purchased a further 2 O2 accounts :!:

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you use an emb defence?

not what you've read here of recent..

 

those went out the window years ago.

holding/no paperwork defence is the norm now.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when i say embarrassed defense i pointed out that no agreement, default notice, assignment or breakdown of how the alleged debt has become the figure claimed has been produced prior or at the point of claim...

 

hadituptohere

 

*NOT been produced prior

 

hadituptohere

Edited by dx100uk
merge

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

post it up here please

 

so we know what you stated.

just in case it goes to the disclosure stage and we have to refer to it in your WS

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 The Defendant entered into an agreement for a O2 refresh account (the Account) with Telefonica UK ltd.

This Agreement provided both a service for agreement for the provision of airtime , and a consumer credit Act 1974 regulated agreement for the provision of hardware.

 

2) in breach of the agreement , the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service agreement was Terminated, with sums outstanding in respect of the provision of both airtime and hardware.

 

3) the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 31/08/2017 and notice given to the defendant.

 

4) despite repeated requests for payment the sums of 314.34 remains due and outstanding

and the Claimant claims

a) the said sum of 314.34

b) interest pursuant to S69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue but limited to one year being £25.15

c) Costs

……………….

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and

generic in nature.

 

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on

CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a

specific response has not been made.

 

1 I cannot recall the specifics nor am I aware of any default

notice or legal assignment the claimant refers to within its

particulars of claim and I have no knowledge

of who the claimant is nor have I been provided with any Notice of

Assignment pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

2. It is denied that any amounts are due under any contractual

agreement.

 

On receipt of this claim

 

I requested information pertaining to this claim from the

Claimants Solicitors by way of a CPR 31:14 request sent via 1st

class recorded post on 05/11/2018.

 

Further to the above I sent Lowell Portfolio I LTD a section

78 request via 1st class recorded post on 05/11/2018.

 

To date, neither Lowell Solicitors nor Lowell Portfolio have

supplied the requested information.

 

Therefore with the court’s permission the Claimant is put to

strict proof to

 

a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an

agreement;

b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount

claimed for;

c) show how the agreement was legally terminated to allow the

claimant relief.

d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under

statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

3. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that

the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

4. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt,

it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to

contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and

Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.6.

 

By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied

that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so perfect...not an emb defence at all but a variant of our holding/no paperwork ones

 

good job


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im embarrassed at their POC's :roll:..

 

Thank you difficulties of dealing with anxiety and depression and fighting Kensington

 

hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today received Directions Questionnaire in the post, Lowells looking for settlement/Mediation...

 

From what i can remember Ive to fill out my own N180, how long do I have to do this? with christmas and New year?

 

Love the 'we recommend that you obtain independant legal advice in order to fully understand your rights'

 

As for mediation no documentation, no case... cant see that being a long conversation...

 

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no conv at all..if they don't provide the documents to allow you to be reasonably informed upon the debt.

 

if its YOUR BLANK N180 from the court

or when you get it

 

3 copies

as per instructions in almost any claimform thread here already.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou dx...

 

a little rusty since Cabot days.. appreciate the help

 

Merry Christmas everybody.

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Received my N180 from the courts last week, it has to be returned by the 30th Jan... I've held off completing it, had no response from my CCA request or my CPR 31:14 which was signed for by both solicitors and Claimant 10th Dec..

 

I take it NO to mediation as ive not had the information regarding the claim made?

 

hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

always yes

must be seen to allow them time.

even right upto the actual mediation phonecall. itself. then you say no if you've got nowt back to make an informed decision.

yes to mediation

1 wit you

the rest is obv

 

3 copies

1 to the court

1 to the sols [minus email/sig/phone]

1 for your file.

 

should have been reading up in the waiting period.

on nearly every claimform thread here already.

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx, appreciate the info..

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone...

After a long wait for mediation that couldn't move forwards as there wasn't sufficient information regarding the claim ive received the following from the courts today...

 

upon considering the court file

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1) By xx time xx April 2019 the Claimant shall send the court and to the Defendant further Particulars of Claim which fully comply with CPR16.4 and CPRPD16 and set out in the detail the claim against the Defendant to include when the agreement was entered into, the original parties to the agreement and any subsequent variation/assignment, when notice of any variation/assignment was given, the nature/key terms of the agreement, when any default/termination notice was served and showing how the debt has accrued resulting in the sum now claimed.

Ant documents required by CPR PD16 should be attached.

2) By xxpm xxMay 2019 the defendant, if so advised, has the permission to send to the court and to the Claimant a further/amended defense to the claim.

3)Because this order has been made by the court without considering representations from the parties , any party may apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed. A party wishing to make such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within 7 days of service of this order.

 

 

Sit Back and await what Lowells can or cant produce 😁..

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well Lowlifes had until the 24th April to submit Particulars of Claim that fully comply with CPR16.4 and CPRPD16 and nothing, ive just rang the local County Court inquiring if they have received anything, ive been told nothing received but lowlives have been on the phone saying there collecting the information and it will be forwarded.. I have until the 15th May to submit a further/amended defense, I asked if i would be given an extension to that date and was told by the clerk 'at the Judges discretion' ??

 

How can this be allowed??

 

Hadituptohere


I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they fail to serve anything by the 15th May then there is nothing further for you to serve.....nothing has changed and they have failed to comply with the initial directions and their claim should be struck out.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

The day has passed that I wouldn't have needed to send an amended defence.. just contacted the court and they have received a letter from lowlifes saying they never received the court order, the court have sent them a copy of the court order on the 7th May.. been told to contact lowlives And ask when they will have the correct particulars of claim ????? What the heck?? 

 

Hadituptohere 

Edited by Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 8)

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...