Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is an article from a couple of years ago about how someone won against the council, but it does mention that there are two sets of signs.   https://www.dailypost.co.uk/business/business-news/driver-wins-appeal-over-mersey-13931137   HB
    • Let them go back to court and then force them to produce everything they wont.
    • Impotrant   https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/UKHMCTS/bulletins/24c3af1 How will the new process work? The process for applying for a warrant of control will remain the same; creditors will continue to use the existing application routes of either a paper application form via a local court or an electronic application on Money Claim Online (MCOL). Following a successful application, the warrant is issued to the relevant Warrant of Control Support Centre. The centre will then manage the warrant for approximately 12 days. During this time, trained staff will: Attempt to contact the debtor by telephone or SMS, using any contact details provided on the warrant application form. They will check that the debtor is aware of the judgment; speak to them and inform them that a warrant of control has been issued; and provide them with further information about next steps, available options and signpost them to debt advice services. Identify potentially vulnerable debtors and will offer additional support via specialist agencies. If a debtor is identified as potentially vulnerable, still will inform the creditor and ask how they wish to proceed.
    • Good Afternoon,   It would be greatly appreciated if you ladies and gentlemen can advise me what direction I should take, my problem is since we moved to our semi house my neighbour has made our lives hell constantly whinging and also accused us of damaging her property. Basically a blame game from her even though we have never done nothing whatsoever. She Even tried to put a anti social behaviour on me due to me refusing to pick up leaves from her garden saying the leaves belong to your trees. She asked me to replace the fences on the boundary which is my responsibility but here is my dilemma my side of the fence which has the feather boards there’s no rotting whatsoever due to me putting wood preservative and maintaining the fences, on her side where the framework batons hold the feathered boards have rotted away and the fences have collapsed due to her negligence of not maintaining her side, even though it’s my fence where do i stand in this predicament? she would not entertain on splitting the cost, i dare not ask. My main concern is that just recently she had her flat roof redone , my roof is pitched and there is a gap in between the both boundaries, but what her roofers have done  they have stuck the asphalt on my roof tiles without any consultation also encroaching on to my side of the boundary. How and what way should i go about getting the asphalt off my tiles, I approached her to tell her to remove the asphalt but was rude. Legally how do i go about it, also do i have a strong case? At the  moment i am a carear for my mother who is on palliative care so i had to give up work to look after her, so my finances are low. Please  i would look forward to your responses and suggestions thank you.   
    • You have no right to reject the car just because an EML warning light has become apparent, you don't even know what the fault is. You should be reasonable and accept the offer to repair. You should be working with the garage, not against them.   
  • Our picks

    • My personal experiences of Future Comms 
       
      Don't touch them owe me £500 since January 2019 make excuse after excuse. Seem they always have software problems sending money out. Keep saying they will call back or email nothing been chasing it now for 6 mths the phone staff always have the same banter we will chase it up and get back to you then nothing!
      • 0 replies
    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
PercyPercy

Erudio/Shoosmiths Claimform - 1995-98 SLC Loans - ignored or returned everything since 2013

Recommended Posts

Will do. I'm not going to have much chance to work on it before tomorrow however. :|

 

Also today received back the £1 postal order I sent to Erudio with my CCA request. Comp slip enclosed from Arrow Global (not Erudio, though I know they are one and the same). Handwritten note reads:

 

Please note Arrow no longer require £1 fees for requests under the Consumer Credit Act. Please find your Postal Order enclosed and returned to you. Many Thanks.

 

It's not signed. I wondered if this is somehow 'complying' with the request (albeit not in the way I requested!), seeing as tomorrow would be the CCA deadline?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Arrow always return the fee......I assume they think its makes your request void and removes their legal liability


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening,

 

Here's my second draft:

1. The claimant's claim is for monies due from the defendant under the regulated agreement(s) between the defendant and Student Loans Company Limited under master reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, and assigned to the claimant on 22/11/2013, notice of which has been provided to the defendant.

 

2. The defendant has failed to make payments in accordance with the terms of the agreement(s) and default notice(s) have been served pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974

 

3. The claimant claims the sum of £7116

 

4. The claimant has complied, as far as is necessary, with the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims

 

 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is noted and accepted the Defendant has in the past had financial dealings with the Student Loans Company. The Defendant does not recall the precise details of the alleged agreement or debt, and has sought verification from the Claimant who has to date has failed to comply. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly provided by the Claimant.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant is not aware of any alleged service of a Default Notice pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974, either by the claimant or The Student Loans Company

 

3. The annual income of the Defendant has never exceeded the published limits for deferral since graduating in 1998.

 

4. On receipt of the claim, a request for information pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act (section 77) was sent to the Claimant on the 29th November 2018. The statutory fee of £1 has since been returned as unnecessary to the request and the Claimant has failed to comply with the request. To this date the Claimant remains in default.

 

5. On receipt of the claim a CPR 31.14 request was sent to the Claimant’s solicitors were posted 29th November 2018. The Claimants solicitors have failed to comply with the request. To this date the Claimants solicitors remain in default.

 

6. It is not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

b) show how the Defendant’s alleged debt has reached the amount claimed for; and

c) show the nature of breach and service of a Default Notice and subsequent Notice of Sums in Arrears in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974; and

d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant proves the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8. On the alternative, as the Claimant claims to be an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief

Edited by PercyPercy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you think? I want to mention deferment, but don't want to get snarled up referring to T&C's I've never seen - that feels like admitting liability... or at least makes it seem less likely I would be 'unaware' of the assignment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Change your 1 to the following.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is denied.The annual income of the Defendant has never exceeded the published limits for deferral since graduating in 1998.

The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly provided by the Claimant pursuant to the LoP Act 1925.

 

And remove your 3 and renumber...rest is fine.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy.

 

Here, for the sake of thoroughness, is the final draft then:

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

Paragraph 1 is denied.It is accepted the Defendant has in the past had financial dealings with the StudentLoans Company my annual income has never exceeded the published limits by SLC for payment since graduating in 1998. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly provided by the Claimant pursuant to the LoP Act 1925.

 

Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant is not aware of any alleged service of a Default Notice pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974, either by the claimant or The Student Loans Company

 

On receipt of the claim, a request for information pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act (section 77) was sent to the Claimant on the 29th November 2018. The statutory fee of £1 has since been returned as unnecessary to the request and the Claimant has failed to comply with the request. To this date the Claimant remains in default.

 

On receipt of the claim a CPR 31.14 request was sent to the Claimant’s solicitors were posted 29th November 2018. The Claimants solicitors have failed to comply with the request. To this date the Claimants solicitors remain in default.

 

5. It is not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

b) show how the Defendant’s alleged debt has reached the amount claimed for; and

c) show the nature of breach and service of a Default Notice and subsequent Notice of Sums in Arrears in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974; and

d)show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant proves the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. On the alternative, as the Claimant claims to be an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

8. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is the bit about deferral correct?

I thought you had to defer regardless , that's how they know your income is not above the required level to require repayment at the % rate you signed up to?

 

might be a play on words, but I would hate to see Erudio exploit this in court?


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

post 6/7 andy = no ignored and returned everything re: post 1


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Better hold that defence then...requires further tweaks.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

plausible deniability...???

 

the defendant is unaware of any notice of assignment sent by the Original creditor - the student loans company [sLC] assigning all rights to the claimant under the Law of Property's Act [ref etc].

 

The annual income of the Defendant has never exceeded the published limits by SLC for payment since graduating in 1998.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence tweaked in post # 32....given there is no reference to deferral in the claimants particulars then nor should there be in the defence...just that the limits have never been exceeded.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think you've copied the wrong bit in andy…??

it mentions deferral?


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy and DX, thanks so much for giving this your attention. Going to file this defence (#32) shortly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MCOL website playing up. Telephoned MCOL helpline and they recommended filing by email. Worth a call if anyone else having trouble. Will double check tomorrow to make sure everything filed.

 

Thank you very much for all your help. Will let you know outcomes. Off to enjoy Christmas now, have a great one!

 

Donation forthcoming xx (next on to do list!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again,

 

Happy New Year and Happy Birthday!

 

Wanted to give a quick update.

 

There have been no significant developments with my claim since filing my defence, however I have received a couple of letters from Shoosmith.

 

The first arrived on the 21st December (deadline for defence), which offers an extension for filing my defence and states CPR 31.14 doesn't apply to small claims (but they'll comply anyway...)

 

The second acknowledges receipt of my defence (feel free to delete if you don't think these are relevant/of much interest to others!)

 

Best,

Percy

SM201218.pdf

SM020119.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its not been allocated to track yet so CPR DOES apply!!

 

they have 28 days to do 'something'

else it gets autostayed

costing them more to lift the stay


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, I thought that might be the case, so reassuring to see you post as much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

A letter arrived from Shoosmiths over the weekend, suggesting settlement. (Copy attached). Is it safe/best to ignore?

I haven't received anything recently from the court. SLC have complied with my SAR. I've heard nothing with regard to my CPR or CCA requests (beyond my last post)

 

Many Thanks

Percy

SM070219redacted.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

begging letter safe to ignore

 

urm.. this is going way to smoothly .what I thought would happen. but really didn't think it would to date be so predictable


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good thing, yes? The way I've just read it I'm not so sure! :|:|

 

Ps. Thanks again for getting back to me. You are making all the difference with this, and I'm extremely grateful for all your help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a search of me on cag responding to recent threads.

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=slc+erudio+dx100uk+2019&sa=Search+CAG

 

my thoughts are that its another exercise is getting guaranteed [or what they think are] as no-one responded to the pap letter.

you like 3 here got the pap but ignored= they go for a CCJ thinking it will pass thru without question nor a human seeing it or checking it.

 

as far as i'm aware nowhere is there a case of erudio wining a CCJ whereby its defended.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...