Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The two companies are lowell and cabot.   I'll get the information and come back with it.   I did do quite a bit of 'Google' research before coming on here. There's a lot of confusing information out there they seem to tell you half the story.   Just so I'm clear. Bailiffs in my situation, if authorised by a court. Can enter the property through an unlocked door and seizure goods? Or can they not do that with a consumer credit ccj? Or point me in the right direction so I can read up on it.   Thank you for your help. It's good to finally speak to somebody who tells you how it is.
    • I've just acknowledged the claim and im reading up on how to do the cca and cpr requests now.   Thanks for all your help         Edit:   I was jus reading the cpr 13 template and it says i am requesting: " (template removed - dx)
    • Hi dx   Post 23 letter has been hidden as has a name in it. I did read the thread and in post 7 saw mention of 'must complain within 3 years of being aware it was mis-sold' if this is what you are referring to? Also my policy is live currently.   I think you know this, but it seems the RBS/Halifax agent doesnt know, that 'I became aware it was mis-sold just before I raised my claim (2019) having read a media article'  as I dont think the PPi team showed them the original claim form maybe, who knows.   Expanding, sorry I missed the word PPi after 'loan' in my post you quoted and highlighted. To be clear, the life protector was not for a loan, but a mortgage, and that mortgage did have a mis-sold PPi on it which they have admitted and refunded.   If it helps, I have several mortgage offers here from 1999 and they say 'Minimum life cover to be assigned to the bank'    The odd thing here is, I started the mortgage and PPi in 1999 but it was 2003 this life assurance started. I do categorically recall being told it was something I had to have though.   Many thanks   E 
    • MP's are good for other things but for some reason are not very good for Council Tax.
    • I've just acknowledged the claim and im reading up on how to do the cca and cpr requests now.   Thanks for all your help  
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Can an executor sue someone who stole from the deceased?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 815 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A relative's carer helped themselves to her bank account.

This was discovered by the executor who stopped looking back through the bank account when the amount topped £11k in the five months prior to her death and handed the matter to the police.

 

It is going to court and there's little doubt there will be a conviction.

It will however be for considerably less than the amount taken because the criminal case is sensibly concentrating on those withdrawals and purchases which can be proved without any doubt.

 

The direct victim was the now deceased relative and if she was still alive she could sue the thief.

 

Can executor or beneficiaries?

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's the plan.

Criminal conviction first.

I don't think there's any money there but there is a house.

 

I'm guessing whether the beneficiaries sue or not will depend on the sentence. Might not be very nice but I do understand them wanting their pound of flesh.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

You really wouldn't believe it.

The last thousand odd was withdrawn from cashpoints while she was in hospital in the last few days of her life, drugged up on morphine and with her son not leaving her side. The maximum withdrawal allowed per day for four days.

 

They're still claiming this was at her request and they handed it over to her. The only time her son left her during that time was to go to the hospital cashpoint and withdraw his own money because the carer was complaining she hadn't been paid.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I would wait for the conviction as mentioned.

 

Something to consider

 

If the Carer was employed by the Local Council/Trust/NHS they are responsible for the actions of there employees.

 

In my opinion this then gives you the avenue of holding the Employer responsible for there Employees action so you go after both the Individual and there Employer to recover the Funds.

 

Even though the Conviction if not set I would raise your concerns about this carer there Employer and also the Care Quality Commission: https://www.cqc.org.uk/contact-us/report-concern/report-concern-if-you-are-member-public

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites
If the Carer was employed by the Local Council/Trust/NHS they are responsible for the actions of there employees.

It was a private arrangement, started out as a cleaner and then did more and more. I believe she was introduced initially by a family member who worked with her in a private care home. The arrangement had been in place for years without apparent problem. We don't feel it's our place to say anything to anyone until after a court case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would normally be the executor who brings claims on behalf of the estate. Not the beneficiaries.

 

See http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part19#19.7 and http://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2016/01/14/a-potential-beneficiary-cannot-bring-an-action-on-behalf-of-an-estate/.

 

Legal fees and expenses can be paid out of the estate. It can be a good idea for the executor to ask for the beneficiaries to confirm they are happy for the executor to take that action where possible, so that there can be no question of the executor mismanaging the estate.

 

The timing is difficult. It would be easier to bring a civil claim after the criminal case - as facts proved in the criminal case could be used as evidence in the civil claim. However, waiting gives the Defendant more time to hide assets. If any assets belonging to the Defendant can be identified (e.g. a house, a bank account), it may be worth the executor proceeding with legal claims ASAP, to reduce the chances of the Defendant disposing of those assets without making payment. By the time you get to the end of the criminal case the money will probably be gone.

 

Options such as a freezing order over the Defendant's bank account can be considered. It would probably be a good idea for the executor to take an initial bit of legal advice to assess whether there are simple steps that can be taken now to secure the assets. Indeed, the executor's duties to the estate probably demand they at least consider properly whether the estate should be taking legal action now or not.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your answers. As it happens, the executor was one of the beneficiaries. I don't think there's a hope in hell of seeing any of the money, we knew that from the start and it isn't why the matter was handed to the police. It's more a case of the beneficiaries (maybe) wanting a civil judgement as well just to make a point really if the criminal case doesn't lead to a sentence which satisfies them. What she did deserves a custodial sentence. What may actually be admitted to/bargained down to is another matter and the beneficiaries understand/accept that. Any guilty verdict will at least mean she can't do this to anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the evidence against the Defendant is clear, obtaining a civil CCJ should not be particularly difficult.

 

There would be a cost to filing the court claim though, which you might not get back if the Defendant has no more money, unfortunately.

 

In the circumstances fingers crossed that the criminal process gives you some sort of resolution.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
There would be a cost to filing the court claim though,

Money isn't an issue - it's far more about, well revenge really which is why I said earlier it's not very nice but I understand it. I think the sons feel every emotion but anger. Guilt is certainly high on the list for 'allowing' it to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...