Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1923 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

we think that a policy is wrong because it confuses one entitlement with another,

in this case annual leave entitlement and TOIL (time off in lue),

 

the policy say that if you work more than 7.5 hours on a bank holiday (in our case we work 9.5 hours) you can only claim 7.5 hours to prevent you getting more leave than departments who work 7.5 hours on bank holidays, but TOIL is not annual leave!

 

Thank for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 year later...

Hi all,

payroll has not paid my wages into my new bank account,

i filled out all relevant forms and was told i would be paid on the march payroll,

 

 

they have not done it and i can't contact them as it is a bank holiday

and i have had to cancel most of my plans

 

 

i'm so angry that they have no system in place for this sort of situation.

 

can i claim compensation from them for this?

 

 

I am confident that they will refuse this so who or what body could i contact about this?

Any ideas or help would be great.

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has it been paid to your old bank account? Do u have access to it if it has?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

when i changed accounts it was with a switch guarantee so any payment is sent to my new account, my new bank has just tried to contact them but its bank holiday and can't get an answer.

My gut feeling is that payroll has messed up my account number, if i could i would bloody claim compensation as i have cancelled plans.

Thanks for your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As frustrating as it is, there would be no grounds for compensating you if it is a payroll error.

Has your old account now been closed after the switch?

They dont always close them, worth a check at an atm

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

My employer who is a large hospital have just amended the smoking policy to not only cover all areas within the grounds of the hospital but also the streets surrounding the hospital.

 

To my knowledge these streets are run by the local council and not run by the hospital therefore it is perfectly legal to smoke in public open spaces.

 

People are asking if this policy can be enforced by a disciplinary as the hospital have no administrative control of the surrounding areas and feel that their civil rights are being violated.

 

Any advice would be great thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

would staff smoking all around a hospital in public view bring the hospital into disrepute?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The policy says that staff can't smoke in uniform which is fair enough we accept that,

the issue is that staff are being challenged while on their way into work in the street, not in uniform and before the start of their shift.

 

They can't tell who are members of the public and who are staff unless they recognise you.

They are concerned about the hospital reputation but they could supply a shelter as they do at other hospitals but choose not to.

 

This seems to be an attack on our right to smoke in a public place, if they are so concerned about the image of the hospital what next?

over weight members of staff not allowed to eat cakes outside the hospital?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say challenged on their way in, challenged by whom an exactly when, at the time or after they arrive? If the former I would be speaking to mu union about a possible common assault complaint ( assault doesnt have to be physical, it can be threats or other verbal forms). It would be unlikely to get as far as the police being involved but may get into the realms of workplace bullying and certainly the hospital demigods who dream up these things wont like any adverse publicity

Link to post
Share on other sites

You phrase it as question about your rights to smoke in a public place,

but one of the hospital's concern is likely to be that when staff smoke outside and then come into work they reek of cigarette smoke.

 

Non-smokers (ie most of us) can smell it on staff yards away, although many smokers appear not to notice it themselves.

 

Since stopping smoking is one of your employer's main public health policies it's entirely reasonable to have an employment rule that stops staff coming to work and smelling of cigarette smoke as that undermines the hospital's public health priorities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You phrase it as question about your rights to smoke in a public place, but one of the hospital's concern is likely to be that when staff smoke outside and then come into work they reek of cigarette smoke. Non-smokers (ie most of us) can smell it on staff yards away, although many smokers appear not to notice it themselves. Since stopping smoking is one of your employer's main public health policies it's entirely reasonable to have an employment rule that stops staff coming to work and smelling of cigarette smoke as that undermines the hospital's public health priorities.

 

I appreciate what you are trying to say, but that is surely a question of personal hygiene rather than the right to carry out a lawful activity whilst not on the employer's premises? Almost like a colleague with BO being advised to use deodorant? If your suggestion were correct (and it may well be the case in part) then the employer could prohibit employees from smoking a mile away from work, or even at home, due to the smell of smoke on breath or clothing?

 

The smell of smoke has not been given by the employer as a reason for the policy. It has simply been stated that smoking is prohibited on hospital property and in the surrounding streets - almost certainly in the interests of public health on hospital grounds, and in the interests of not bringing the NHS into disrepute for the surrounding area, so the question asked by the OP would be still have to be whether the employer could dictate what an employee does even when off the premises.

 

My suggestion is the same as already given - providing that the employee is covered and cannot be easily identified as a hospital employee then there is nothing that the employer can d to impose this outside of hospital grounds - otherwise as stated, where could the boundaries lie?

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi All,

I work for the nhs and for the last 2 years have not been part of the on call and out of ours working due to a recommendation from occupational health because of back problems.

 

A new manager has started who has said that i should be taking part in these out of hours shifts regardless of my back problems, someone has suggested that because it has been 2 years of no extra shifts it may be implied contract.

 

On the other hand management do not have to follow recommendations made by occupational health i am afraid that if i am put on extra shifts i may have to take more time off sick leading to dismissal what can i do?

 

Thank you for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'd be asking for an occupational health referal to assess if your health has changed.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i am a member of unison but have not contacted them as yet.

 

Contact the union. The manager does have a point possibly - if you can work normal hours, what is it about a bad back that means you don't work other hours and everyone else does? And I'm not being judgmental about that, just saying it's a valid point. So you need to look at why your bad back makes your position different than everyone else's position. Equality sometimes means that you need to be able to demonstrate your adjustments on an ongoing basis - just as you'd expect the employer to look at doing a bit more if you needed it. It cuts both ways. Be reasonable, talk to the union, and get your condition confirmed (if that is necessary).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...